Intersectionality as an emerging discipline in the 21st Century Women Studies
Keywords:
Intersectionality, African-American women studies, multi-dimensional oppression, Black FeminismAbstract
The Civil Rights Movement and Feminist Movement in the 1960’s America fought for their basic rights and eventually were successful in achieving them. These two movements promised a new beginning for African-American men and White American women, but ironically these movements were relegating an equally important issue and that was of Black American women. Both the Civil Right and Feminist activists did not fulfill their promise to help Black women of America to come out of their century’s old bondage of multi-dimensional oppression. It was high time for black women activists, writers and intellectuals to raise their voice against the injustice they faced in their own homes where they confronted domestic violence in the hands of male family members and in the homes of their white masters and landladies where these black women worked as maids or nannies. Black feminists argued that feminism which was in vogue at the middle of the 20th century has always been Euro-centric in its approach; they didn’t see a promising future for themselves even when Civil rights movement was successful. For them, it was male dominated movement, sexiest and misogynist in its approach. Also, feminism was not giving enough space to black women as it always carried white supremacy at its core. Black women were left out in protest and rallies which were organized by white middle class American women because of the racist attitude. Black women of America started their own campaign against the oppression they faced in the society to make their voices heard and their identities recognized. In this paper, I have tried to present the core issues of Intersectionality (study of multiple oppressions), its inclusive nature, its difference from traditional feminism and the major arguments of Intersectional theorists who have tried to use Intersectionality as a new research paradigm in women studies.
References
Anzaldúa, G.E. (1987). Borderlands, La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Collective, C. R. (1983). The Combahee river collective statement. Home girls: A Black feminist anthology, 264-74.
Collins, P. H. (2002). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241.
Crenshaw, K.W. (1989). De-marginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago legal forum, 1, 139-167.
Hooks, B. (1981). A’int I a woman. Massachusetts, USA: South End Press Boston.
Hull, G. T., Hull, A. G., Bell-Scott, P., & Smith, B. (1982). All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black Women’s studies. New York, USA: Feminist Press.
King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(1), 42-72.
Lorde, A. (1982). Learning from the 60s. Sister outsider, 140, 110-13.
Moraga, C., Anzaldúa, G. (1983). This Bridge Called my Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. New York, USA: Kitchen Table, Women of Color
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.