Structure and efficiency of onion market in Karnataka

Authors

  • Vedamurthy, K B Department of Dairy Business Management, Dairy Science College, KVAFSU, Bidar, (Hebbal Campus), Bengaluru - 560024, Karnataka, India Author
  • Prashanth S J Dept. of Food Processing and Nutrition, Karnataka State Akkamahadevi Women's University, Vijayapura - 586108, Karnataka, India Author
  • Shashidhar T R AICRP on Potato, MARS, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad - 580005, Karnataka, India Author

Keywords:

Market conduct, market efficiency, market structure, onion market, Gini, Lorenz curve

Abstract

Farmers in Karnataka face high levels of distress due to low price realization and lower productivity. The marketing system plays a crucial role  in addressing this issue, especially for onion, which covers 67% of the area under vegetables in the state. The Lorenz curve and Gini  coefficient were used to assess competitiveness, while the Toda-Yamamoto (T-Y) method examined price integration and efficiency. The  findings showed that Bengaluru, which accounted for over 65% of onion arrivals, had a high concentration of traders, with just 3% of traders  handling 50% of onions in 2017-18. This indicates an extremely high level of concentration, with farmers becoming price takers. Integration  and efficiency analyses showed that most markets had two-way Granger causality and were interdependent with Bengaluru. However, the  high concentration of traders meant that price discovery was inefficient, leaving farmers as mute spectators. To address this issue, market  intervention through information, innovations, and institutions is necessary. The government must provide institutional support and access to  information, better marketing infrastructure, and innovative marketing techniques. This will help improve price discovery, reduce market  concentration, and provide better market access to farmers. Farmers should also be encouraged to diversify their crops, utilize modern  technology, and receive better credit facilities. These measures will help reduce the farmers' dependence on a single crop, mitigate price  fluctuations, and increase productivity. In conclusion, a competitive and efficient marketing system is critical to alleviating the distress faced by  farmers in Karnataka. 

References

Ali. 2011. T-Y Granger Causality between Stock Prices and Macroeconomic Variables: Evidence from Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). European Journal of Business and Management, 3(8): 2222-2839.

Birthal, Pratap S., Joshi, P.K., and Laxmi Joshi. 2011. Diversification and Its Impact on Small holders: Evidence from a study on vegetable production, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 19:219-236.

Enders, W. 2004. Advanced Econometric Time Series (Second Edition), New York: Willey.

Gini, and Corrado. 1921. Measurement of Inequality of Incomes. The Economic Journal. Blackwell Publishing. 31 (121): 124– 126

Gujarati, D.N. 2006. Essential of Econometrics (third edition), McGraw Hill.

Government of Karnataka. 2013. State Agriculture Profile, Karnataka State Department of Agriculture, Bangalore, Karnataka. He, Z.,and Maekawa, K. 1999. On spurious Granger causality. Economic letters, 73 (3): 307–313 Lorenz, M.O. 1905. Publications of the American Statistical Association 9 (70) : 209-219

Toda, H.Y., and Yamamoto, T.1995. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics. 66. 225–250.

Subramanyam, K. V., and Sudha, M. 2004. Diversification of small farms through horticultural crops. https://krishi-vishleshana-phalaka.com

Published

2021-01-30

How to Cite

K B, V., S J, P., & T R, S. (2021). Structure and efficiency of onion market in Karnataka . Journal of Postharvest Technology, 9(1), 86–94. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jpht/article/view/15168