Perception towards Cultured Meat: A Survey of Potential Consumers in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Cultured meat, Consumer perception, India, Consumer research, SurveyAbstract
Meat is an important component of the food basket of India and it plays a critical role in meeting protein demand and ensuring the nutritional security of the ever-growing population. Concerns related to environmental impact, shrinking resources, and animal welfare issues continue to haunt the meat industry. Cultured meat on the other hand promises to produce meat without the need to rear the livestock by utilizing fewer resources with minimum impact on the environment. Here, an effort has been made to capture the perception of Indian consumers towards cultured meat by conducting a survey. Results of the survey revealed that about 60.52% of the respondents are willing to buy the cultured meat if made available. It was found that 45.9% of the respondents who are willing to buy cultured meat are ready to pay a premium price range between 10-30%. Among the respondents, 54.0, 59.1 and 66.5% opinedthat cultured meat is a potential alternative to traditional meat in view of challenges like sustainability, nutritional security, and animal welfare, respectively.
Downloads
References
Bekker GA, Tobi H, Fischer AR (2017) Meet meat: An explor ative study on meat and cultured meat as seen by Chinese, Ethiopians and Dutch. Appetite114:82-92.
Bhat ZF, &Fayaz H (2011). Prospectus of cultured meat—advanc ing meat alternatives. J Food SciTechnol 48(2):125-140. Bryant CJ, Szejda K, Deshpande V, Parekh N, Tse B (2019) A
survey of consumer perceptions of plant-based and clean meat in the USA, India, and China. Front sustain food syst 3:11.
Demirtas B (2018) The effect of price increases on fresh meat consumption in Turkey. ActaUnivAgric Silvic Mendel Brun 66(05):1249–1259.
Fiala N (2008) Meeting the demand: An estimation of poten tial future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production. Ecol Econ67:412-419.
FMI (2020) The power of meat 2020. Report prepared by Food Marketing Institute and the Foundation for Meat & Poultry Research and Education: 1–56. https://www.fmi.org/forms/ store/ProductFormPublic/power-of-meat-2020. (Accessed 16 March 2021).
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. FAO, Rome
Giampiero G, Pietro G, Andrea V, and Adrian GW (2019) Livestock and climate change: Impact of livestock on cli mate and mitigation strategies. Anim Front 9(1):69–76.
Government of India (2014). Sample Registration System Baseline Survey 2014. Available at: http://www.censusindia. gov.in/vital_statistics/BASELINE%20TABLES07062016. pdf (Accessed on 10th October 2020)
Hocquette A, Lambert C, Sinquin C, Peterolff L, Wagner Z, Bonny SPF, Hocquette JF (2015) Educated consumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry. J IntegrAgric14(2):273-284.
Laestadius LI, Caldwell MA (2015) Is the future of meat palat able? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments. Public Health Nutr18(13):2457-2467.
Lesschen JP, van der Berg M, Westhoek HJ, Witzke HP, Oenema O (2011) Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Anim Feed SciTechnol166-167:16-28.
Majra JP, Gur A (2009) Climate change and health: Why should India be concerned? Indian J Occup Environ Med 13(1):11–16. Mancini MC, Antonioli F (2019) Exploring consumers’ attitude towards cultured meat in Italy. Meat Sci150:101‐110.
O’Keefe L, McLachlan C, Gough C, Mander S, Bows-Larkin A (2016) Consumer responses to a future UK food system. Br Food J118(2):412-428.
Rolland NCM, Markus CR, Post MJ (2020) The effect of infor mation content on acceptance of cultured meat in a tasting context. PLoS ONE 15(4):e0231176.
Scollan ND, Greenwood PL, Newbold CJ, Yanez Ruiz DR, Shingfield KJ, Wallace RJ, Hocquette JF (2011) Future research priorities for animal production in a changing world. Anim Prod Sci51(1):1-5.
Sharma S, Thind SS, & Kaur A (2015) In vitro meat production system: why and how? J food scitechnol 52(12):7599-7607. Siegrist M, Sütterlin B (2017) Importance of perceived natural ness for acceptance of food additives and cultured meat. Appetite113:320-326.
Siegrist M, Sütterlin B, Hartmann C (2018) Perceived natural ness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat. Meat Sci 139:213-219.
Slade P (2018) If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer pref erences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite125:428-437.
Subramaniam MD, Vellingiri B, Sang IL, and Kim IH (2014) An outline of meat consumption in the Indian population - A pilot review. Korean J Food SciAnimResour34(4):507-515.
Timothy FL, Bevin C, Thomas EW, and Elaine LL (2012) A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Rep127(1):4–22.
Tucker CA (2014) The significance of sensory appeal for reduced meat consumption. Appetite81:168-179.
Tuomisto HL, de Mattos MJT (2011) Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environ SciTechnol45(14):6117-6123.
Verbeke W, Marcu A, Rutsaert P, Gaspar R, Seibt B, Fletcher D, Barnett J (2015)a ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers’ reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Sci102:49-58.
Verbeke W, Sans P, Van Loo EJ (2015)b Challenges and pros pects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat. J IntegrAgric14(2):285-294.
Vleeschauwer AD, Poucke SV, Braeckmans D, Doorsselaere JV, Reeth KV (2009) Efficient transmission of swine-adapted but not wholly avian influenza viruses among pigs and from pigs to ferrets. J Infect Dis 200:1884–1892.
Wilks M, Phillips CJ (2017) Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PloS one 12(2):e0171904.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
