Comparing the Yield and Knowledge Level of Cluster Frontline Demonstration (CFLD) Beneficiaries and Non-Beneficiaries

Authors

  • Rishabh Yadav PhD Scholar, Department of Agricultural Extension Education, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut-250110, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • L B Singh Professor and Head, Department of Agricultural Extension Education, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut-250110, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Harsha PhD Scholar, Department of Agricultural Extension Education, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut-250110, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shubham Singh Assistant Professor, School of Agricultural Sciences, IIMT University, Meerut-250001, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Mohit Kumar Pandey Project Associate-II, Centre for Aromatic Plants, Selaqui, Dehradun-248011, Uttarakhand, India
  • Manoj Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension, DDU University, Gorakhpur-273009, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Ayush Kumar Project Associate, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda-210001, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • C N Amogh PhD Scholar, Department of Agricultural Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Chandra Shekhar Prajapati Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension, DDU University, Gorakhpur-273009, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62220

Keywords:

Demonstration, Knowledge, Mustard, Oilseed, Evaluation.

Abstract

The research was conducted during 2024-25, aimed to assess the benefits of the Cluster Frontline Demonstration (CFLD) programme on mustard cultivation knowledge and yield among farmers in Uttar Pradesh (UP). By employing the quasi-experimental design, comparing non-beneficiaries (B0), previous beneficiaries 2021–2024 (B1) and current beneficiaries 2024-25 (B2) with 120 participants each and a total sample size of 360, across three Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) of UP. The data was collected through a personal interview. Knowledge scores (% correct) and yield (q ha-1) were measured and compared by using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results showed a significant difference in yield, i.e. 14.00 q ha-1 (B0) and 18.61 q ha-1 (B2), and median knowledge increased significantly in variety (27.27% to 63.64%) and harvesting and threshing (50.00% to 100.00%) across three groups. All practices show a significant difference (p < 0.00625), with effect sizes up to 0.293. Results show that the CFLD programme significantly increases knowledge and yields, due to targeted training and resource support. Non-significant initial differences in some practices suggested overcoming barriers with sustained participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. (2025). All India mustard production 2024–25: Detailed report. The Solvent Extractors’ Association of India. https://www.igrain.in/posts/all-india-mustard-production-2024-25-detailed-report

Bennett, C. (1975). Up the hierarchy. The Journal of Extension, 13(2), 7–12. https://open.clemson.edu/joe/vol13/iss2/2

Bhowmik, P., & Biswas, P. (2024). Impact assessment and popularisation of improved production technology of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Hepper and greengram (Vigna radiata L.) Wilczek through cluster frontline demonstrations (CFLDs) in old alluvial soil of Malda, India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 55(12), 1784–1801. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2024.2329270

Chahal, V. P., Nain, M. S., Singh, R., & Chandel, S. S. (2014). A study on cognitive and psychomotor factors of hill farmers on adoption of agri-horti farming system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(12), 1550–1554.

Giordano, M., de Fraiture, C., Weight, E., & Van der Bliek, J. (2012). Water for wealth and food security: Supporting farmer-driven investments in agricultural water management. IWMI.

Gupta, B. K., Singh, V., Singh, B. K., Singh, N., & Mishra, B. P. (2020). Impact analysis of front-line demonstrations on yield and economics of mustard crop in Banda district of Bundelkhand, Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.153

Jha, A. K., Mehta, B. K., Kumari, M., & Chatterjee, K. (2025). Impact of frontline demonstrations on mustard in Sahibganj district of Jharkhand. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(3), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2021.57307

Kalia, A., Shukla, G., Mishra, D., Mishra, B. P., & Patel, R. R. (2021). Comparative trend analysis of mustard in Bundelkhand region, Uttar Pradesh and India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(1), 15–19.

Kalita, S. K., Chhonkar, D. S., & Kanwat, M. (2020). Assessment of cluster front line demonstrations on rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) in Tirap district of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 55(3), 17–22.

Kumar, A., Kalia, A., Gupta, B. K., Mishra, D., Shukla, G., Mishra, B. P., & Ojha, P. K. (2022). An economic analysis of mustard production in Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh, India. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa & Latin America, 53, 5039–5048.

Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Kumari, P., & Kumar, S. (2023). Impact assessment of CFLD pulses on pigeonpea productivity and profitability in farmers’ fields. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(2), 36–40.

Kumar, V., Chauhan, J. K., Upadhyay, A. D., Pal, P., Lahiri, B., Ghosh, A., Singh, Y. J., & Chandegara, A. K. (2024). Assessment of training effectiveness for fish farmers of Tripura. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 24(2), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.54986/irjee/2024/apr_jun/10-18

Lahiri, B., Anurag, T. S., Marak, B. R., Sangma, A. K., & Sangma, S. M. (2020). Development of mobile-based fishery advisory prototype: An experience with fisher tribes of Garo Hills in North-Eastern Himalayan region of India. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 67(3), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2020.67.3.88288-02

Lahiri, B., Kurmi, R. K., Singh, S. K., Ghosh, A., Pal, P., Pavan Kumar, S. T., Nirmalkar, C., & Debnath, A. (2025). Determinants of digitised farm information outreach in aquaculture: A case of mobile phone application for smallholder fish farmers in North East India. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(4), 15342–15380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02471-1

Lankinen, A., Witzell, J., Aleklett, K., Furenhed, S., Karlsson Green, K., Latz, M., & Grenville-Briggs, L. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for increasing the use of low-risk plant protection products in sustainable production: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 44(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00957-5

Murre, J. M. J., & Dros, J. (2015). Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0120644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120644

Nain, M. S., Bahal, R., Dubey, S. K., & Kumbhare, N. V. (2014). Adoption gap as the determinant of instability in Indian legume production: Perspective and implications. Journal of Food Legumes, 27(2), 146–150.

Nain, M. S., Kumbhare, N. V., Sharma, J. P., Chahal, V. P., & Bahal, R. (2015). Status, adoption gap and way forward of pulse production in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(8), 1017–1025.

Pavana Kumar, S. T., & Lahiri, B. (2023). Conditional selection of multifactor evidence for the levels of anaemia among women of reproductive age group. Evaluation and Program Planning, 100, 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102344

Raj, S. (2013). E-agriculture prototype for knowledge facilitation among tribal farmers of North-East India: Innovations, impact and lessons. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 19(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2012.718247

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Sachan, D. S., Naimuddin, S. K., Patra, D., Subha, L., Senthilkumar, T., Chittibomma, K., & Prasad, S. V. (2024). Advancements in enhancing oil quality in rapeseed and mustard: A comprehensive review. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(5), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i52369

Sahoo, A. K., Sahu, S., Meher, S. K., Begum, R., Panda, T. C., & Barik, N. C. (2021). The role of Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVK) in strengthening national agricultural research extension system in India. Insights into Economics and Management, 8(9), 43–45. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ieam/v8/2453E

Samajder, T., Das, T. K., & Lahiri, B. (2016). Knowledge, attitude and practices of different tribes of Garo Hills districts of Meghalaya towards scientific horticulture. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 4(2), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2016.00014.3

Sangwan, M., Singh, J., Pawar, N., Siwach, M., Solanki, Y. P., & Karan, R. (2021). Evaluation of frontline demonstration on mustard crop in Rohtak district of Haryana. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(2), 6–10.

Sarkar, S., Padaria, R. N., Burman, R. R., Gurung, N., & Barma, P. (2025). Evaluating the performance of cluster frontline demonstration (CFLD) on mustard in North Bengal. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61108

Sharma, N., Roy, H., & Maji, S. (2022). An appraisal of cluster frontline demonstrations on mustard crop in Sawai Madhopur district of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(4), 124–129.

Singh, L. K., Zimik, L., & Devi, S. R. (2022). Impact of cluster frontline demonstrations on field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in valley areas of Manipur. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(2), 195–197.

Published

2026-03-23

How to Cite

Comparing the Yield and Knowledge Level of Cluster Frontline Demonstration (CFLD) Beneficiaries and Non-Beneficiaries (R. Yadav, L. B. Singh, Harsha, S. Singh, M. K. Pandey, M. Kumar, A. Kumar, C. N. Amogh, & C. S. Prajapati, Trans.). (2026). Indian Journal of Extension Education, 62(2), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62220