Analyzing Perception and Hesitation in the Context of Home Science Career Aspirations

Authors

  • Komal Kriti Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Extension Education and Communication Management, Ethelind College of Community Science, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Aarti Singh Assistant Professor, Department of Extension Education and Communication Management, Ethelind College of Community Science, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Akansha Yadav Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Ethelind College of Community Science, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Anshu Professor and Dean, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Ethelind College of Community Science, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211007, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61106

Keywords:

Home science, Career, Hesitation, Perceptions, Peer influence, Stereotypes

Abstract

Home science, despite its rich potential for addressing contemporary societal needs, faces hesitation among prospective students as a viable career option. The study conducted in 2024 on 50 students from several Home Science Educational Institutions. This study adopted a descriptive approach, using structured close-ended questionnaires through quantitative analysis involving interviews and surveys to collect information. This study explored the relationship between students’ perceptions of home science as a career option and the factors contributing to their hesitancy in pursuing it. A chi-square analysis was conducted. The findings indicated that stereotypes, peer influence, and confusion about career pathways significantly impact students’ perceptions, contributing to hesitation in choosing home science. Conversely, gender bias, limited career knowledge, uncertainty about job opportunities, and lack of family support did not show significant relationships with students’ perceptions, indicating that these factors were less influential in their decision to consider home science as a viable career option. These findings highlighted the importance of addressing stereotypes and peer pressure while providing clearer career pathways to improve the perception of home science. The study suggested that targeted interventions in these areas could encourage more students to view home science as a rewarding and viable career choice. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arunachalam, R., Shri, K. P. S., & Sasmitha, R. (2020). An analysis of the aspirations of undergraduate agricultural students. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 56(4), 14-18. https://epubs.icar. org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/108297

Baker, J., & Jones, D. (2017). Navigating academic choices: The role of peer influence in career selection. Journal of Social Psychology, 22(5), 410-425.

Bhatia, R., & Reddy, S. (2017). Career Counselling in Higher Education: Addressing the Gaps in Home Science Awareness. International Journal of Career Guidance, 29(4), 134-145.

Das, A. (2021). Rural versus urban perspectives on home science education and gender roles. Journal of Rural Education Research, 17(1), 85-97.

Das, S. (2021). Professional identity and recognition in home science careers. Journal of Professional Development, 47(4), 301-316.

Gupta, S., & Verma, M. (2019). Influence of Peer pressure on career choices among adolescents: A study on home science students. International Journal of Youth Studies, 12(4), 56-68.

Joshi, P. (2020). Career pathways in home science: a study of students’ perceptions and career confusion. Journal of Career Development, 35(2), 145-157.

Kaur, M., & Patel, N. (2020). Home Science: A field misunderstood? An analysis of gender-based stereotypes and career outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 189-204.

Kumar, R., & Jain, A. (2018). Parental Influence on Career Choices: Why home science is still not a preferred option. Indian Journal of Career Guidance, 15(2), 130-145.

Meinam, M., Ojha, S. N., Singh, Y. J., Lahiri, B., & Meinam, T. (2023). Educational Aspirations among the Students of Manipur University, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59416

Nair, P., & Bose, S. (2020). Economic perspectives on career choices: the case of home science in India. Journal of Economic Education and Career Studies, 33(2), 89-102.

Patel, N., & Kumar, A. (2016). Cultural perceptions and career choices: understanding the home science paradigm in India. Journal of Social Science and Education, 35(2), 221-230.

Priyanka, P., Tigga, A. S., & Kumari, M. (2019). Empowerment level of employed women in decision making. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 55(1), 97-100. https://epubs.icar.org.in/ index.php/IJEE/article/view/109252

Rao, K., & Sinha, V. (2020). Bridging the gap between home science education and industry needs: a curriculum perspective. Asian Journal of Education and Research, 53(3), 221-237.

Sharma, R., Singh, A., & Kumar, P. (2021). Gender stereotypes and career choices: the case of home science in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 18(3), 112- 125.

Sharma, S. (2017). Societal influence on career choices: the case of home science in India. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(2), 125- 138.

Singh, K., Patel, R., & Sharma, N. (2018). The role of guidance and mentorship in choosing non-traditional career paths. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 42(4), 254-270.

Singh, R., & Bhatt, M. (2018). Peer pressure and career decision making: The influence of social groups on student aspirations. Journal of Career Development, 27(2), 150-165.

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Analyzing Perception and Hesitation in the Context of Home Science Career Aspirations (K. Kriti, A. Singh, A. Yadav, & Anshu , Trans.). (2025). Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(1), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61106