ChatGPT as an AI-enabled Academic Assistant: Attitude and Usage among Fisheries Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.60311Keywords:
ChatGPT, AI-enabled assistant, Attitude, Technology acceptance model, Fisheries studentsAbstract
Educational landscape stands to undergo a profound transformation with the advent of ChatGPT, an AI-driven academic assistant which empowers students to access information, create content, and enhanced learning experiences. Compared to Google BARD and Bing Chat, ChatGPT emerges as superior choice for text-based content and language-related tasks, offering the potential to streamline academic endeavors and deliver personalized learning experiences. ChatGPT stands out for its versatility in academic settings. The study focused on how fisheries students perceive and utilize ChatGPT within their specialized field, employing a validated Technology Acceptance Model framework. Among 84 participants, mostly post-graduate students averaging 24.5 years of age, findings revealed that 75 per cent had prior knowledge of ChatGPT, and 70 per cent reported using it. Notably, 38 per cent expressed highly favorable attitudes toward its usage. An independent t-test revealed gender differences in ChatGPT usage among fisheries students. Principal Component Analysis highlighted factors influencing ChatGPT adoption, such as innovativeness, perceived risk, anxiety, and academic integrity concerns among non-users, while users were driven by cognitive behavior factors, perceived usefulness, attitude, peer influence, innovativeness, and ease of use. The findings deepen our understanding of AI assistants’ acceptance and usage in academia, setting the stage for further research in this evolving field.
Downloads
References
Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., & Sallam, M. (2023). Factors influencing attitudes of university students towards chatgpt and its usage: a multi national study validating the TAME-ChatGPT survey instrument.
Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429.
ChatGPT. (2023). Retrieved September 27, 2023, from https:// chat.openai.comBard-Chat Based AI Tool from Google, Powered by PaLM 2. (n.d.). Retrieved October, 2023, from https:// bard.google.com
Chayal, K., Vatta, L., & Ranawat, R. (2023). Influence of stream of study on the information-seeking behaviour of students. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(3), 21-25.
Conroy, G. (2023). How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing. Nature, 622(7982), 234–236. https:// doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03144-w
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, pp 319-340.
Devansh (2022, December 31). 5 Free ChatGPT competitors you should know about for 2023. Mediumhttps://medium.com/ geekculture/5-free-chatgpt-competitors-you-should-know-about for-2023-ff5fc48d0430
Elkins, K., & Chun, J. (2020). Can GPT-3 pass a writer’s Turing test? Journal of Cultural Analytics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22148/ 001c.17212
Khanganbi, T. B., & Priya, M. (2024). Social media addiction among the rural youth: An AI interpretation. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 60(2), 52-55. https://doi.org/10.48165/ IJEE.2024.60210
Liu, R., Jia, C., Wei, J., Xu, G., & Vosoughi, S. (2022). Quantifying and alleviating political bias in language models. Artificial Intelligence, 304, 103654.
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29.
Marikyan, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2023) Technology Acceptance Model: A review. In: Papagiannidis, S. (Ed), Theory Hub Book. Available at http://open.ncl.ac.uk / ISBN: 9781739604400
Meinam, M., Ojha, S. N., Singh, Y. J., Lahri, B., & Meinam, T. (2023). Educational Aspirations among the Students of Manipur University, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 77-81.
NEP_Final_English.pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved October 17, 2023, from https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/ NEP_Final_English.pdf
Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Assessing health students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e48254. https://doi.org/ 10.2196/48254
Stallbaumer, C. (2023, October 17). Introducing Bing Chat Enterprise, Copilot for Microsoft 365pricing, and Microsoft Sales Copilot. Microsoft 365 Blog. (n.d.).https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ microsoft-365/blog/2023/07/18/introducing-bing-chat-enterprise microsoft-365-copilot-pricing-and-microsoft-sales-copilot/
Williamson, B., Macgilchrist, F., & Potter, J. (2023). Re-examining AI, automation and datafication in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1–5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
