Construction and Validation of Research Satisfaction Scale (RSS) for Post-Research Analysis of Graduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.601RT3Keywords:
Content validity index, Cronbach’s alpha, Graduates, Research satisfaction, Scale development and scale product methodAbstract
A better understanding of the researcher’s attitude starts with knowing their satisfaction level, which helps the agricultural universities understand research graduates and make necessary improvement plans. Absence of such a specific scale, forced to draft present piece in 2022 focusing on developing the Research Satisfaction Scale using the scale product method. Initially, 63 items were pooled, scrutinized, and reduced to 57 based on the rules of Edward and Kilpatrick and segregated into three groups as: ‘Before, while performing, and after performing research.’ Scale and Quartile values were calculated, and the statements with an S-value less than the Q-value were eliminated, bringing the number of statements to 53. For validation – Content Validity Index (CVI), both item and scale were used and Cronbach’s alpha for measuring reliability. The score of Item- CVI <0.70 were eliminated, making the total number of statements 36. The Scale – CVI was 0.92, with an internal consistency value of 0.792, making the developed scale with 36 items valid and reliable. Research studies can be formulated by ICAR and SAUs to understand the contentment the graduates attained with their undertaken research activity.
Downloads
References
Aqil, Z., & Upadhyay, A.K. (2017). Attitude towards Research Scale (ATRS): A factor analytic study. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4).
Attitudes & job satisfaction. (n.d.). In Organizational Behaviour. Pearson Education. https://wps.pearsoned.co.uk/ema_uk_he_ robbins_orgbeuro_1/151/38820/9937929.cw/-/9937949/ index.html#:~:text=Job%20satisfaction%20can%20be%20defined
Butcher, H. J. (1956). A note on scale product and related methods of scoring attitude scales. British Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 133– 139.
Edwards, A. L., & Kilpatrick, F. P. (1948). A technique for the construction of attitude scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(4), 374–384.
Eysenck, H. J., & Crown, S. (1949). An experimental study in opinion attitude methodology. International Journal of Opinion & Attitude Research, 3, 47–56.
Gupta, S. K., Nain, M. S., Singh, R., & Mishra, J. R. (2022). Development of scale to measure agripreneurs attitude towards entrepreneurial climate, Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(2),153-57.
ICAR. (n.d.). Under-Graduate, Post-graduate and Doctoral Programmes available for admission. Agricultural Education Portal. Retrieved July 26, 2022, from https://education.icar.gov.in/ graduate_course.aspx
Kapuriya, T., Jadav, N., Zala, P., & Chovatia, J. (2020). Standardized scale to measure factors related for avoidance of agriculture as a profession. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 56(3), 198– 200.
Kumar, R., Slathia, P. S., Peshin, R., & Nain, M. S. (2015). Development of scale to measure attitude of farmers towards rapeseed mustard crop. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 10(2), 221-224.
Kumar, R., Slathia, P. S., Peshin, R., Gupta, S. K., & Nain, M. S. (2016). A test to measure the knowledge of farmers about rapeseed mustard cultivation. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 52(3&4), 157-159.
Lynn, M. R., & McMillen, B. J. (2004). The scale product technique as a means of enhancing the measurement of patient satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive, 36(3), 66–81.
Meghwal, P. K., & Jadav, N. (2020). A Scale to measure perception of the farmers about role of mobile in decision making process in agriculture. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 56(3), 173– 176.
Morgado, F. F. R., Meireles, J. F. F., Neves, C. M., Amaral, A. C. S., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2017). Erratum to: Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexão E Crítica, 30(1).
Papanastasiou, E. C., & Zembylas, M. (2008). Anxiety in undergraduate research methods courses: its nature and implications. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(2), 155–167.
Rishi, S., Dhaka, B. L., Kirti, Meena, L. K., & Meena, S. N. (2021). Developing an instrument to measure adaptive capacity of farmers to climate change. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(4), 17–22.
Rodrigues, I. B., Adachi, J. D., Beattie, K. A., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1).
Sahu, P. K. (2013). Research methodology: a guide for researchers in agricultural science, social science and other related fields. Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1020-7
Shitu, G. A., Nain, M. S., & Kobba F. (2018). Development of Scale for assessing farmers’ attitude towards Precision Conservation Agricultural Practices. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(3), 499-504.
Vijayan, B., Nain, M. S., Singh, R., Kumbhare, N. V., & Kademani, S. B. (2023). Knowledge test for extension personnel on Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana, Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(1), 131-134.
Woody, C. (1927). The values of educational research to the classroom teacher. The Journal of Educational Research, 16(3), 172–178. Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
