Awareness and Determinants of Farmers Participation in e-Marketing of Agricultural Commodities in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59433Keywords:
e-marketing, Factors, Awareness, Logit regressionAbstract
Integration of APMCs across the country through e-NAM was to augment price discovery and dissemination. The process of electronic marketing being new to the stakeholders, the awareness and constraints entailed herein are addressed. This study evaluates the extent of awareness among farmers about different processes of e-marketing, along with the determinants of their participation. A total of 240 farm households were selected randomly through multistage sampling for the primary survey. The result of the study infers that distance to the market and farm size of the farmers was the most important factors that determine farmers’ participation in e-marketing. Awareness about different e-marketing processes among farmers is relatively lower in Andhra Pradesh compared to Karnataka. The promotion of more participation to create an efficient marketing system there is a need for elaborated awareness about e-marketing among farmers and also increases the capacity building programmes to enhance knowledge about several process of trading.
Downloads
References
Aggarwal, N., Jain, S., & Narayanan, S. (2017). The long road to transformation of agricultural markets in India: Lessons from Karnataka. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(41), 47-55.
Bisen, J., & Kumar, R. (2018). Agricultural marketing reforms and e national agricultural market (e-NAM) in India: a review. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 31, 167-176.
Chand, R. (2016). e-platform for national agricultural market. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(28), 15-18.
Chengappa, P. G., Arun, M., Yadava, C. G., & Prasanna Kumar, H. M. (2012). IT application in agricultural marketing service delivery electronic tender system in regulated markets. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 25(347-2016-17062), 359-372.
Dey, K. (2016). National agricultural market rationale, roll-out and ramifications, Economic and Political Weekly, 51(19), 35-39. Gautam, S., Srivastava, A. B., & Bohra, D. (2022). Factors constraining farmer’s adoption of the e-national agriculture market (eNAM) in Sultanpur District of Uttar Pradesh. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 40(12), 501-506. GoI (Government of India). (2016). Agricultural statistics at a glance. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi. Nuthalapati, C. S. R., Bhatt, Y., & Beero, S. K. (2020). Is the electronic market the way forward to overcome market failures in agriculture? Economic & Political Weekly, 41(38), 52-60. Pavithra, S., Gracy, C. P., Saxena, R., & Patil, G. G. (2018). Innovations in agricultural marketing: a case study of e-tendering system in Karnataka, India. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 31(347-2018-3189), 53-64.
Purohit, P. (2016). Measurement of regulations of the agricultural produce markets. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(28), 37. Raju, M. S., Devy, M. R., & Gopal, P. S. (2022). Knowledge of farmers
on functioning of e-NAM. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(2), 26-29.
Reddy, A. A. (2018). Electronic national agricultural markets: the way forward. Current Science, 115(5), 826-837.
Roy, D., Joshi, P. K., & Chandra, R. (2017). Elements of a national agricultural market in India. In: Mani G., Joshi P., Ashok M. (eds) Financing Agriculture Value Chains in India (pp. 211-238). Springer, Singapore.
Yadav, M. M., Husain, A. S., & Srinivasaiah, L. (2023). Utilization of e-NAM facilities and services by farmers in Telangana. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(1), 96-100.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
