Determinants and Constraints for Adoption of Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) Practices

Sunil Kumar; Manjeet Singh Nain; V Sangeetha; Satyapriya

doi:10.48165/IJEE.2023.59427

Authors

Sunil Kumar PhD Scholar, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi & SMS (Agricultural Extension) KVK, Kaneri, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
Manjeet Singh Nain Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
V Sangeetha Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
Satyapriya Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59427

Keywords:

Zero budget natural farming, Farmer field school, Logit regression, Constraints, Factor analysis

Abstract

Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) follows agroecological principles and promotes chemical-free farming. It has emerged as cost-effective farming improving soil fertility and providing chemical-free food. For determining factors for the adoption of ZBNF practices in the purposively selected Wardha district of Maharashtra, conducted during 2022-23, Logit regression and for analyzing the constraints, factor analysis was used. The study revealed significant factors like integrated soil fertility management practices, adoption of ZBNF practices and IPM practices. The scarce raw materials for input preparation, management of weeds and pests were identified as input related whereas, lack of knowledge about liquid fertilizers, insect pest and weed management practices were reported as technology constraints, in case of the constraints related to labour and machinery, non availability of the bullock, high demand of skilled labour and high labour wages were reported. In case of institutional constraints, higher conversion period, high demand of skilled labour, and high certification fee were found. The assurance of better prices, purchase agencies at distant places, and lack of proper market structure were reported as the marketing constraints. In the case of political and legal constraints, a lesser number of FPOs, the synergy of the ZBNF practices with mainstream agriculture, lack of globalized market, and the need for convergence were found significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhattacharya, N. (2017). Food sovereignty and agro-ecology in Karnataka: Interplay of discourses, identities, and practices. Development in Practice, 27(4), 544-554.

Bhuiyan, M. M. R., & Maharjan, K. L. (2022). Impact of farmer field school on crop income, agroecology, and Farmer’s behavior in farming: A case study on Cumilla district in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 14(7), 4190.

Chatterjee, R., Acharya, S. K., Biswas, A., Kumar, P., & Haque, M. (2022). Understanding conservation agriculture in terms of

knowledge, perception and application. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(3), 99-103.

Das, S. (2020), Zero Budget Natural Farming-A Holistic Alternative Towards Sustainable Agriculture. AGRICULTURE & FOOD: e Newsletter, 2(8), 550-553.

Devi, N., Raina, K. K., & Sharma, R. (2020). Constraints perceived by the farmers of Himachal Pradesh in organic farming. Economic Affairs, 65(2), 213-218.

Duddigan, S., Collins, C. D., Hussain, Z., Osbahr, H., Shaw, L. J., Sinclair, F., & Ann Winowiecki, L. (2022). Impact of zero budget natural farming on crop yields in Andhra Pradesh, SE India. Sustainability, 14(3), 1689.

Gupta, N., Tripathi, S., & Dholakia, H. H. (2020). Can zero budget natural farming save input costs and fertiliser subsidies. Report. The Council on Energy, Environment and Water, pp 1-30.

Khadse, A., Rosset, P. M., Morales, H., & Ferguson, B. G. (2018). Taking agroecology to scale: The zero budget natural farming peasant movement in Karnataka, India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 192-219.

Kumar, R., Kumar, S., Yashavanth, B. S., Venu, N., Meena, P. C., Dhandapani, A., & Kumar, A. (2023). Natural farming practices for chemical-free agriculture: implications for crop yield and profitability. Agriculture, 13(3), 647.

Laishram, C., Vashishat, R. K., Sharma, S., Rajkumari, B., Mishra, N., Barwal, P., & Sharma, N. (2022). Impact of natural farming cropping system on rural households-evidence from Solan district of Himachal Pradesh, India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 878015.

Nain, M. S., Singh, R., & Mishra, J. R. (2020). Relevance of good agricultural practices in organic production systems. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 15(2), 306-314.

Niranjan, S., Singh, D. R., Kumar, N. R., Jha, G. K., Venkatesh, P., Nain, M. S., & Krishnakumare, B. (2023). Do information networks enhance adoption of sustainable agricultural practices? evidence from northern dry zone of Karnataka, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(1), 86-91.

Priya, N. K., & Naidu, S. M. (2019). Perception and constraints of zero budget natural farming in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(6), 2174- 2176.

Rao, M. S., Patro, T. S. S. K., Lakshman, K., Ravisankar, N., & Panwar, A. S. (2021). Study on perception and extent of adoption of natural farming practices in Vizianagaram district of Andhra Pradesh, India. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(8): 989-993.

Rosset, P. M., & Martínez-Torres, M. E. (2012). Rural social movements and agroecology: context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society, 17(3).

Sharma, R., & Peshin, R. (2015). Impact of vegetable integrated pest management farmer field school programme in sub-tropical region of Jammu and Kashmir. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 51(1&2), 9-14.

Singh, A., & Thakur, R. K. (2022). Understanding the perception, constraints and reasons for the adoption of organic farming. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(5), 110- 117.

Vashishat, R. K., Laishram, C., & Sharma, S. (2021). Problems and factors affecting adoption of natural farming in Sirmaur District of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Ecology, 48(3), 944-949.