COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PLASMA MEMBRANE INTEGRITY OF I SPERMATOZOA BY USING HOS MEDIUM AND DISTILLED WATER AND THEIR RELATION WITH POST THAW MOTILITY

Authors

  • M K SHUKLA Animal Breeding Centre (Unit of JJ.BRO India), Salon, Rae Bare/i, Uttar Pradesh-229 127
  • SUJIT SAHA
  • K S RATHORE
  • G K MISHRA
  • M U SIDDQUI
  • S K SAXENA

Keywords:

HOS medium, Plasma membrane integrity, HOS reactive sperms, Cattle, Buffalo, Post Thaw motility

Abstract

This study was carried out on 148 frozen thawed semen, samples from cattle (58 from 11 HF bulls, 36 from
7 crossbred bulls, 33 from 6 Sahiwal bulls and 21 from 4 Jersey bulls} and 57 frozen thawed semen samples from
11 buffalo bulls maintained at Animal Breeding Centre (a Unit of ABRO India), Salon, Rae Bareli, UP. Plasma
membrane integrity of cryopreserved sperms was studied with the help of HOS solution (Osmolarity 0.080 Osmole/
kg, pH 7.31) and double distilled water (Osmolarity 0.001 Osmole/kg, pH 5.93). The mean percentages of HOS
reactive sperms in HOS solution and double distilled water for cattle and buffalo were 57.61±0.57, 48.98±0.34 and
57 .06±0. 75, 47 .14±0.34, respectively. Except. Crossbred, the percentage of HOS reactive sperms in HOS solution
was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the percentage of reactive sperms in distilled water in HF, Jersey and
Sahiwal breed of cattle. The results revealed that the HOS solution was more suitable hypo-osmotic medium for
assessing the plasma membrane integrity of frozen thawed spermatozoa as compared to Double distilled water.
Highly significant positive correlations were observed between HOS reactive sperms in HOS solution and in
distilled water as well as with post thaw motility (PTM) in both the species (r = 0.42 to 0.75).

Published

2023-01-14

How to Cite

SHUKLA, M.K., SAHA, S., RATHORE, K.S., MISHRA, G.K., SIDDQUI, M.U., & SAXENA, S.K. (2023). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PLASMA MEMBRANE INTEGRITY OF I SPERMATOZOA BY USING HOS MEDIUM AND DISTILLED WATER AND THEIR RELATION WITH POST THAW MOTILITY. The Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction, 33(2), 7–9. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijar/article/view/4342