Pragmatic Failure and Politeness Strategies in Young Sheldon: A Sociolinguistic Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2026.7204Keywords:
Pragmatic Failure, Sociopragmatic Failure, Communicative Competence, Politeness Theory, Scripted Television, Grice’s Cooperative Principle, Young Sheldon, Humour, Sociolinguistics, Media DiscourseAbstract
This article explores PF and SPG failure in Young Sheldon, examining how the titular character’s speech patterns contribute to the comic effect, characterisation, and broader sociolinguistic issues. Based on Grice’s Cooperative Principle, Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory, and Hymes’ Communicative Competence Model, the study sheds light on Sheldon’s concretism, impoliteness, and lack of pragmatic adaptations to natural and social contexts, leading to frequent misunderstandings. A thematic framework discourse analysis approach is used, analysing selected scenes by transcribing and categorising instances of talk in which Sheldon exhibits pragmatic and/or sociopragmatic breakdowns. Its relation to the social description of each speech act is examined in terms of its impact on interpersonal relationships and humour. These results indicate that while scripted television may overemphasise pragmatic errors for the sake of comedy, it also mirrors the sociolinguistic issues that neurodivergent speakers and L2 learners encounter in the real world. By examining how humour arises from pragmatic norm violations, the article sheds light on the realignment of linguistic competences in media representations. It suggests avenues for further study, such as longitudinal investigations into Sheldon’s pragmatic development and the cross-cultural (in)acceptance of his speech patterns.
References
Altakhaineh, A. R., Abu Hasheish, M., & Hamaydeh, D. (2024). Pragmatic failures in intercultural communication: Evidence from Jordan. Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2024-36-2-38-62
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humour. Mouton de Gruyter.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press.
Bednarek, M. (2010). The language of fictional television: Drama and identity. Continuum.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Chen, Y. (2023). Analysis of pragmatic failure in cross-cultural communication: A case study of Business English majors. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 7(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v7i1.4916
Dynel, M. (2011). Stranger than fiction? A few methodological notes on linguistic research in film discourse. Brno Studies in English, 37(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2011-1-3
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Gündüz, N. (2016). Sociopragmatic elements and possible failure in EFL teaching. Dil Dergisi, 167(1), 49–60. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/780035
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
Ibraheem, H. A., & Abbas, N. F. (2016). The pragmatic failure in humour across cultures: A case study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(4), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.188
Iwata, Y. (2010). Pragmatic failure in topic choice, topic development, and self-disclosure by Japanese EFL speakers. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(2), 145–157. https://www-s3-live.kent.edu/s3fs-root/s3fs-public/file/11YukoIwata.pdf
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Lusted, D. (2010). The media studies book: A guide for teachers. Routledge.
Messikh, D. (2023). Socio-pragmatic and pragma-linguistic failures in cross-cultural communication. Revue Akofena, 4(17), 341–350. https://www.revue-akofena.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/30-T08v04-17-Djihed-Messikh_341-350.pdf
Ochs, E., Solomon, O., & Sterponi, L. (2005). Limitations and transformations of habitus in child-directed communication. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 547–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054406
Omar, F. R., & Razı, Ö. (2022). Impact of instruction based on movie and TV series clips on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence: Speech acts in focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 974757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974757
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humour. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Richardson, K. (2010). Television dramatic dialogue: A sociolinguistic study. Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91
Wulandari, A., Hapsari, B. S., & Bram, B. (2018). Communication failures in Netflix drama series 13 Reasons Why: A pragmatic analysis. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(2), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v2i1.1343
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


