Social Cohesion Strengthens Social Ties among University Students in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2602%20Keywords:
Unity, Social Cohesion, Ethnicity, Colonial ScienceAbstract
The pattern of ethnic relations and religion among university students is always the focus of understanding Malaysian unity and ethnic relation. This study explores the study of unity by recalling the concept of solidarity put forward by Durkheim. Unity as the main concept needs to be reinterpreted by studying the social realities and social history in Malaysia. Unity happens in the long life of harmony since the 1969 ethnic riots until now, but Malaysia still faces social tensions and fights between ethnic and religious in society. Unity is still considered fragile and just a dream. The concept of social cohesion is expressed as a social phenomenon that needs to be studied as the atmosphere is harmonious but colored with social tension. The multi-culture of Malaysian come from its relationship with east civilization before pre-colonial and the British colonization. The differences between ethnicity and religion in social order cause tension and conflict among the groups. Yet development in the last four decades has changed the social landscape where multi-ethnic societies have turned into a socially diverse society. University students are targeted as respondents in understanding the concepts and patterns of social cohesion among them. Studies show that social cohesion among students is developed. The dimension and item analysis show that there are ethnic and religious differences, but the differences are relatively small. It is suggested that follow-up studies in identifying the form and understanding of the relationship of social cohesion on campus should be conducted through qualitative and ethnographic research design in obtaining data to strengthen ethnic relations in the university. Input from this follow-up study finding will strengthen social cohesion among students that can help governance and university development is well managed by identifying the social gap.
References
Berger-Schmidt, R. 2000. Social Cohesion as an Aspect of the Quality of Societies: Concept and Measurement. European Union Reporting Working Paper No. 14. Mannheim: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA)
Bernard, P .1999. Social Cohesion: A Critique. CPRN Discussion Paper No. F09. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network
Jenson, J. 1998. Mapping Social Cohesion: The State of Canadian Research. CPRN Study No. F03. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network
Mansor Mohd Noor. 2012. Kerencaman Sosial dan Penipisan Batas Etnik: Kepelbagaian Etnik dan Perkongsian Hidup Bersama di Malaysia. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.
Maxwell, J. 1996, Social dimensions of economic growth, Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
MacCracken, M. ‘Social Cohesion and Macroeconomic Performance.’ Paper presented at the Conference ‘The State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life’, Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS), 1998, Ottawa, Canada.
Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z. R., & Beaujot, R. (2007). Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating. Social Indicators Research, 80(3), 461–492.
Shamsul Amri Baharuddin & Anis Yusal Yusoff. 2014. Perpaduan, Kesepaduan, Penyatupaduan: Satu Negara, Satu Kata Akar, Tiga Konsep Keramat. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia Berhad dan Institut Kajian Etnik (KITA)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.