Reading Identity, Reading Essence: A Strategic Essentialist Approach to Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable

Saleha  Ilhaam

doi:10.48165/sajssh.2021.2406

Authors

Saleha Ilhaam Research Scholar, Department of English, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2406

Keywords:

Strategic essentialism, Identity, Representation, Resistance,, ndividual self

Abstract

The term strategic essentialism, coined by Spivak, is generally understood as "a political strategy whereby differences (within Group) are temporarily downplayed, and unity assumed for the sake of achieving political goals." On the other hand, essentialism focuses that everything in this world has an intrinsic and immutable essence of its own. The adaption of a particular “nature” of one group of people by way of sexism, culturalization, and ethnification is strongly linked to the idea of essentialism. Mulk Raj Anand’s Bakha is dictated as an outcast by the institutionalized hierarchy of caste practice. He is essentialized as an untouchable by attributing to him the characteristic of dirt and filth. However, unlike other untouchables, Bakha can apprehend the difference between the cultured and uncultured, dirt and cleanliness. Via an analysis of Anand’s "Untouchable," the present article aims to bring to the forefront the horrid destruction of the individual self that stems from misrepresentations of personality. Through strategic essentialism, it unravels Bakha’s contrasting nature as opposed to his pariah class, defied by his remarkable inner character and etiquette. The term condemns the essentialist categories of human existence. It has been applied to decontextualize and deconstruct the inaccurately essentialized identity of Bakha, which has made him a part of the group he does not actually belong to.

References

Anand, M.R. (1947). Untouchable. Tip tree, England: The Anchor Press

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H., (2001). Key Concepts in Post-colonial Studies. U.K: Taylor & Francis.

Bahar, R. (2021). Islamic Feminism as a Rising Field of Inquiry in Contemporary Times. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2209

Barker, C. (2004). The Sage Dictionary of Cultural Studies. London: Sage Publications.

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). New York, The Noonday Press. (Original work published 1957).

Danius, S., Jonsson, S., & Spivak, G.C. (1993). An Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Boundary 2, 20(2), 24-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/303357.

Dirks, N.B. (2001). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Eide, E. (2010). Strategic Essentialism and Ethnification: Hand in Glove? Nordicom Review, 31(2), 63-78.

Eide, E. (2016). Strategic Essentialism. 1-3. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316228240

Epstein, S. (1998). Gay Politics, Ethnic Identity: The Limits of Social Constructionism. In P. M. Nardi and B. E. Schneider (Eds.). Social Perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies: A Reader. (pp.134-160). London: Routledge.

Fearon, J. D. (1999). What is Identity (As We Now Use the Word)? 1-43. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229052754 (May 28, 2021)

Fuss, D. (1989). Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature & Difference. New York, USA: Routledge.

George, C. J. (1994). Mulk Raj Anand, His art and concerns: A Study of his Non-autobiographical Novels. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.

Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Taylor& Francis.

Kumar, M.P. (2009). Review Essay: Humanism and Its Other Difference and Disjuncture in Postcolonial Theory. Distinktion 18, 87-99.

Morton, S. (2004). Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. London: Taylor& Francis.

O’Reilly, A. (2016). Matricentric Feminism: Theory, Activism and Practice. Bradford, Canada: Demetre Press.

Phillips, A. (2010). What’s wrong with essentialism? Distinktion: Scandinavian journal of social theory, 11(1), 47-60. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30900/. (May 30, 2021)

Ray, S. (2009). Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: In other Words. U.K: Wiley- Blackwell.

Ross, O. (2016). Other Creatures That Have Their Own Identities: Strategic Essentialism in Suniti Namjoshi's Fables. South Asian Review, 37(1), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2016.11933052

Smith, P. (1988). Discerning the Subject (Vol.55). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Suleman, D., & binti Ab Rahman, F. (2020). Transgender Issues in Indian Society from the Viewpoint of Arundhati Roy’s Novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 159-172.

Suleman, D., & Mohamed, A. H. (2019). Examining the Women Issues and Child Abuse as Mirrored by Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 3, 10-21070.

Suleman, D., Mohamed, A. H., & Ahmmed, M. F., (2020). Political and Gender issues in Arundhati Roy’s "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness". Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 5, 1-7, 10-21070.