Decoding Environmental Politics: Industrialization, Indigenous  Rights and Resistance Movements in India

Debendra Kumar  Biswal

doi:10.48165/sajssh.2021.2103

Authors

Debendra Kumar Biswal Assistant Professor, Department of Contemporary & Tribal Customary Law, Central University of Jharkhand Brambe, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2021.2103

Keywords:

Development discourse, Environmental Politics, Indigeneity, Industrialization, Politics of Truth

Abstract

Purpose of the study: To critically examine global discourse of development and it’s dismissive of indigenous environmental knowledge and role of international indigenism in giving space for debate on environmental politics. Based on case study of anti-POSCO movement in Odisha in India, it has tried to sort out dichotomy of openness to change in quality of life of local communities versus role of reactionary forces restricting development. Methodology: This study is a qualitative anthropological study among the tribal and local communities displaced in three villages by the POSCO project in Odisha. Modernisation theory of development was critically examined through the use of both primary and secondary data; interview, observation, Focus Group Discussion of the community, policy makers and activists and content analysis.Main findings: In India, modernization theory of development has pushed to the debate on the way of development “development from below” versus “development from above”. The anti-POSCO movement in Odisha reveals politics of truth; it’s just an extension of other popular movements and anti-development. The truth is of double edged, a confrontation of law of land versus rights of the people, and displacement of a section of population vs. development. Applications of this study: This paper will help create positive hypothesis that the legal industrialization can be legalised for the sake of poverty eradication and livelihood promotion governance. Industrialization is not hegemony of developed countries rather relevance for economic growth and reduction of poverty to meet MDGs in underdeveloped ones. Originality of this study: The theoretical issues raised are inter-disciplinary, pure economics of industry and economic growth, anthropology of modernization and philosophy of social facts and truth. It has also critically correlated the socio-cultural, environmental and agricultural basis of protest to industrialization. The methodology is fieldwork-based observation, interview and focus group discussion. Results have been analysed through dependent and independent variables in ecological anthropology.

References

Aandahl, G. (2009). ‘Technocratic Dreams and the Escape from Politics: The Sardar Sarovar Project in Gujarat’, Oslo: paper presented at the ‘India Today’ seminar, 29 September.

Browne, S. (1990). Foreign aid in practice, New York University Press.

Chatterjee, P. (1993). The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chew, S., & Lauderdale, P. (2010). Theory and methodology of world development: The writings of Andre Gunder Frank. Springer.

Corbridge, S., & Harriss, J. (2013). Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. John Wiley & Sons.

Costa, D. D. (2007). Tensions of neo-liberal development: State discourse and dramatic oppositions in West Bengal. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 41(3), 287-320.

Das, G. (2006). ‘The India Model’. Foreign Affairs, 85(4), 1–7.

Mehta, L. (1999). The Dam and the Nation: Displacement and Resettlement in the Narmada Valley. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(4), 206.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.

Esteva, G. (1992). Development, in Sachs, W (ed.) 'The Development Dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power', Zed Books.

Fernandes, W. (2007). Singur and the Displacement Scenario. Economic and Political Weekly, 42 (3), 203-206.

Findlay, R., & O’Rourke, K. (2009). ‘Power and plenty: trade, war, and the world economy in the second millennium’. Princeton University Press.

Fischer, A. (2015). ‘The End of Peripheries? On the Enduring Relevance of Structuralism in Understanding Contemporary Global Development’. Development and Change, 46(4), 700–32.

Foucault, M. (1985). The Use of Pleasure, New York: Vintage Books.

Ghosh, J. (1999). ‘Development Strategy in India: A Political Economy Perspective’. In S. Bose & A. Jalal (Eds), Nationalism, Democracy and Development: State and Politics in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–183.

Gupta, B. & Roy, T. (2017) From artisanal production to machine tools – Industrialization in India over the long run, in K. H. O’Rourke & J. G. Williamson, eds, ‘The Spread of Modern Industry to the Periphery Since 1871’, Oxford University Press.

Innocent, A. P., Yusoff, K. Z. H., & Eikojonwa, O. (2020). Internal Party Democracy and Institutionalization of Political Parties in Nigeria Fourth Republic. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1-15.

Kaushal, Na. (2009). Displacement: undesirable and unwanted consequences of development. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 19 (1), 77-89.

Kumaran, K.P. (2013). “Socio-Economic Impoverishment Risks in Displacement of Tribals Under polavaram Irrigation project”. Rural Development, 32 (1), 33-46.

Lipset, S.M. (1967). "Chapter 1: Values, Education, and Entrepreneurship". Elites in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kohli, A. (2009). Democracy and Development in India: From Socialism to Pro-Business. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Mohanty, B. (2005). Displacement and Rehabilitation of Tribal’s. Economic and Political Weekly, 40 (13), 13-20.

Nayak, A. K. (2013). Development, Displacement and Justice in India: Study of Hirakud dam. Social change, 43 (3), 397-419.

Nwabunze, D. C., & Obi, N. M. (2020). Prevention, Management and Resolution of Political Conflicts in Nigeria: The Polite Language Approach. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 164-180.

Pandey, B. (1998). Depriving the under privileged for Development. Bhubaneshwar: Institute of Socio- Economic Development.

Parsons, T. (1967) The Structure of Social Action. New York, USA: Free Press.

Parvez, A. (2008). Gendering the National Rehabilitation Policy in India; Social Change, 38(4), 52 -63.

Rahnema, M. (1997). Introduction, in Rahnema, M (ed.) 'The Post-Development Reader', Zed Books

Skocpol, T. (1977). "Wallerstein's world capitalist system: a theoretical and historical critique". American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 1075–90.

Storm, S. (2015). ‘Structural Change’. Development and Change, 46(4), 666–99.

Tipps, D. C. (1973). "Modernization theory and the comparative study of national societies: A critical perspective". Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15(2), 199–226.

Thomas, A. (2000). Poverty and the end of development, in Allen, T. & Thomas, A. 'Poverty and development into the 21st century', OUP.

Viegas, P. (1992). ‘The Hirakud Dam Oustees: The Thirty years after’ in Thukral E.G (ed), Big Dams displaced people: Rivers of Sorrow, River of Change. New Delhi: Sage Publications.