Digital Pathways to Rural Fields: How Social Media Storytelling Shapes Agri-Tourism Destination Image and Visit Intentions

Authors

  • Pranith Vontela Research Scholar GITAM School of Business, GITAM University (Deemed to be University), Hyderabad
  • Sudha Vemaraju Associate Professor, GITAM School of Business, GITAM University (Deemed to be University), Hyderabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/pjhas.2026.12.1.5

Keywords:

Destination image, agri-tourism, rural, user-generated content, social media

Abstract

Background: Agri-tourism has emerged as an important alternative tourism segment, offering authentic rural experiences while supporting local livelihoods. With the growing reliance on digital platforms for travel planning, social media storytelling and user-generated content increasingly shape tourists’ perceptions of rural destinations. However, empirical evidence on how digital narratives influence agri-tourism visit intention remains limited. Objectives: This study examines the influence of digital storytelling elements on agri-tourism visit intention through cognitive–affective destination image. The study aims to investigate the effects of narrative vividness, perceived rural authenticity and user-generated content credibility on cognitive–affective destination image and to assess its impact on agri-tourism visit intention. Methodology: A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was employed. Data was collected from 256 urban respondents from Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra states who are exposed to agri-tourism related digital content using a structured questionnaire. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to evaluate the measurement and structural models. Results: Results indicate that perceived rural authenticity and user-generated content credibility exert moderate positive effects on cognitive–affective destination image, while narrative vividness shows a smaller but significant influence. Cognitive–affective destination image strongly predicts agri-tourism visit intention (β = 0.837), explaining 70% of its variance. The model demonstrates substantial predictive power, with digital storytelling variables jointly explaining 72.9% of destination image. Conclusion: The findings highlight cognitive–affective destination image as a key mechanism linking digital storytelling to agri-tourism visit intention. Authentic rural representation and credible visitor-generated content emerge as more influential than aesthetic storytelling alone. The study offers practical insights for agri-tourism operators and policymakers to design authentic, trust-enhancing digital communication strategies that strengthen rural destination appeal and stimulate visitation.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Beerli, A., & Martín, J. D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.010

Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of online consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27751305

Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19

Filieri, R., Alguezaui, S., & McLeay, F. (2015). Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tourism Management, 51, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.007

Fischer, R., & Karl, J. A. (2025). What predicts intentions and behavior? A cultural exploration of attitude, belief, and norm effects across 55 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 59(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971251338204

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jiménez-Barreto, J., Rubio, N., & Martínez, S. C. (2020). Destination brand authenticity: What an experiential simulacrum! A multigroup analysis of its antecedents and outcomes through official online platforms. Tourism Management, 77, 104022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104022

Kolar, T., & Žabkar, V. (2010). A consumer-based model of authenticity: An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing? Tourism Management, 31(5), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.010

Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. (2006). Predicting behavioral intention of choosing a travel destination. Tourism Management, 27(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.02.003

Lu, L., Chi, C. G., & Liu, Y. (2015). Authenticity, involvement, and image: Evaluating tourist experiences at historic districts. Tourism Management, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.01.026

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714

Stylidis, D., Shani, A., & Belhassen, Y. (2017). Testing an integrated destination image model across residents and tourists. Tourism Management, 58, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.014

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Digital Pathways to Rural Fields: How Social Media Storytelling Shapes Agri-Tourism Destination Image and Visit Intentions . (2026). PUSA Journal of Hospitality and Applied Sciences, 12(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.48165/pjhas.2026.12.1.5