Platform Contracts, Gig Workers, and Pandemic Impossibility: A Structural Imbalance Analysis

Authors

  • Sunil Kumar Research Scholar at Amity Law School, Gurugram
  • Ajay Kumar Bhatt Professor at Amity Law School,Gurugram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/msilj.2025.2.2.2

Keywords:

Gig workers, platform con tracts, structural imbalance, algorithmic control, economic dependence.

Abstract

Gig platforms craft adhesion contracts, classifying 15 million Indian work ers as “partners,” thereby denying social security under Code on Social Security 2020, despite the Gig Workers Act 2026 mandating 1-2% turnover contributions, while COVID lockdowns triggered Section 56 impossibility claims rejected in 70% High Court cases protecting platforms that surged revenues through algorithmic pricing. This doctrinal analysis exposes structural imbalances where platforms control ratings deactivation, and data flows mimicking employment per IFAT v Union of India, yet evade welfare obligations as NITI Aayog reports 40% workers earn below ₹15,000 monthly. Findings advocate EU-style reclassification at 50% control thresh olds, mandatory transparency audits, DPDP data portability, and escrow welfare funds, ensuring India’s ₹2.35 lakh crore gig economy delivers equity for 23.5 million workers by 2030 rather than exploitation.

References

Code on Social Security, 2020, ss. 109–114.

Economic Survey 2025–26. (2026). Government of India, Chapter 10.

Energy Watchdog v. Central Excise, (2010) 5 SCC 14 (India).

Indian Contract Act, 1872, s. 56 (India).

Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers v. Union of India, WP (C) No. 1456 of 2021 (Supreme Court of India).

Karnataka Platform-Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2025.

NITI Aayog. (2022). India’s booming gig and platform economy: Perspectives, prospects, policies. Government of India.

NUJS Law Review. (2026). Employees with(out) benefits: Guaranteed income floor for gig workers. Retrieved January 9, 2026.

Padmanabhan. (2021). Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35, 328.

Saraf & Partners. (2026). States move to regulate gig economy, impose new obligations on platforms. Retrieved January 18, 2026, from https://sarafpartners.com/states-move-to-regulate-gig-economy-impose-new-obligations-on-platforms/

Standard Retail Pvt. Ltd. v. G.S. Global Corp., (2020) 17 SCC 626 (India).

The Workers Rights. (2026). India gig workers act 2026: Mandatory social security rules. Retrieved January 25, 2026, from https://www.theworkersrights.com/india-gig-workers-act-2026-social-security-rules/

TopSource Worldwide. (2026). India’s new labour law reforms 2026: What employers need to know. Retrieved January 12, 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

How to Cite

Platform Contracts, Gig Workers, and Pandemic Impossibility: A Structural Imbalance Analysis . (2026). Maharaja Surajmal Institute Law Journal, 2(2), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.48165/msilj.2025.2.2.2