Effects of harvest date on apple fruit quality at harvesting and after cold storage

Authors

  • Mina Mohebi Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Author
  • Mesbah Babalar Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Author
  • Mohammad Ali Askari Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Author
  • Alireza Talae Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Author
  • Ahmad Ahmadi Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Author

Keywords:

Harvest date, Malus × domestica,, quality parameters, storage, total phenolic content,, total antioxidant activity

Abstract

The physiochemical changes during the storage in apple fruits (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Fuji) that were harvested on different dates were  studied. Fuji apples were harvested from 9 September till 23 October, at five different times and stored at 0±0.5 °C and 95% humidity for 120  days. To determine the best harvest date for maximum quality and storability, physical and chemical parameters were measured at each  harvesting time and after 40-day periods until the end of 120 days of storage. The fruit quality parameters at harvest and after storage,  depended on the degree of the ripeness at which the apples were picked. Fruits of the first harvest were firmest before and after storage and  had the lowest phenolic compounds at the end of storage. First and third harvest date samples had a decrease in phenolic content and total  antioxidant activity in end of storage, but the fourth and fifth harvests fruits showed an increase. Total soluble solids and titrable acidity were  affected by the harvest date and storage duration. First and second harvest date samples had increased in total soluble solids during 120 days  of storage, but it was decreased in third, fourth and fifth harvested samples. The fifth harvest showed more oblate shape for fruits and plus  weight loss in storage duration

References

Al- Obeed, R.S. and Harhash, M.M. 2006. Impact of postharvest treatments on storage life and quality of "Mixican" Lime. International Journal of Advance Agricultural Research. 11: 533-549.

Banarus, M., Lownds, N.K. and Bosland, P.W. 1994. Relationship of physical properties to postharvest water loss in pepper fruit (Capsicum annuum L.). Pak. J Bot. 26: 321 -26.

Bokhari, S. 2002. Apple the sweet gold of Pakistan. Export Promotion Bureau of Pakistan. 2- 15.

Defilippi, B., Dandekar, A.M. and Kader, A. 2004. Impact of suppression of ethylene action or biosynthesis on flavor metabolites in apple (Malus domestica Borkh) fruits. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 52: 5694-5701.

DeLong, J. M., Prange, R., Harison, P. A., Shofild, R. A. and DeEll, J. R. 1999. Using the Streif index as a fial harvest window for controlled-atmosphere storage apples. Hort. Science. 34: 1251-1255.

Duda-Chodak, A. and Tarko, T. 2007. Antioxidant properties of different fruit seeds and peels. Acta Sci. Pol., Technol. Aliment. 6: 29-36.

Faniadis, D., Drogoudi, P.D. and Vasilakakis, M. 2010. Effects of cultivar, orchard elevation, and storage on fruit quality

Farooq, R.A. and Khan, I. 2012. Physico- Chemical Quality Of Apple cv. Gala fruit Stored At Low Temprature. FUUAST Journal of Biology. 2: 103-107.

Gavalheiro, O.J., Santos. A., Recasens, I., Larrigancliere, C. and Silvestre, A. 2003. Quality of the postuguese "Bravo de Esmolfe" apple after normal cold storage or controlled atmosphere and two shelf life periods. Acta Horticulture 1: 395- 400.

Ghafir, S., Gadalla, S., Murajei, B. and El-Nady, M. 2009. Physiological and anatomical comparison between four different apple cultivars under cold-storage conditions. Afr J Plant Sci. 3: 133-138.

Hribar, J., Johnson, D.S., Bohling, H. 1996. The Post-harvest Treatment of Fruit and Vegetables: Quality Criteria. Proceedings of Workshop. Commission of the European Communities.

Kader, A. and Barrett, D.M. 1996. Classification, composition of fruits, and postharvest maintenance of quality. Processing fruits. Science and technology. 1: 1-24.

Kader, A.A. 2002. Postharvest Technology Of Horticultural Crops, UCANR Publications, 3311.

Kevers, C., Pincemail, J., Tabart, J., Defraigne, J., Dommes, J. 2011. Influence of cultivar, harvest time, storage conditions, and peeling on the antioxidant capacity and phenolic and ascorbic acid contents of apples and pears. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 59: 6165-6171.

Kviklienė, N., Kviklys, D., Valiuškaitė, A., Viskelis, P., Uselis, N., Lanauskas, J. and Buskiene, L. 2011. Effect of harvest date on fruit maturity, quality and storability of ‘Lodel’apples. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. 9: 210-213.

Kviklienė, N. and Valiuškaitė, A. 2009. Influence of maturity stage on fruit quality during storage of ‘Shampion’ apples. Scientific Works of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture and Lithuanian University of Agriculture Sodininkystė Ir Daržininkystė. 28: 117-123.

Macheix, J., Fleuriet, A. 1990. Fruit phenolics. CRC press.

Meisami-asl, E., Rafiee, S., Keyhani, A. and Tabatabaeefar, A. 2009. Some physical properties of apple cv.‘Golab’. Agricultural Engineering International, CIGR Journal. Manuscript 1124.

Mosel, H.D. and Herrmann, K. 1974. Phenolics of fruits. 4. Phenolics of blackberries and raspberries and Their changes during development and ripness of fruits. Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel- U. Untersuchung und-Forschung. 154: 324- 327.

Ough, C.S. and Amerine, M.A. (ed). 1988. Phenolic compounds. Methods for analysis of musts and wines. John, Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.

Pocharski, W., D. Konopacka, and J. Zwierz. 2000. Comparison of Magness -Taylor pressure test with mechanical, nondestructive methods of apple and pear firmness measurements. Int. Agrophysics. 14: 311-331.

Reid, M. and Kader, A.(ed) .2002. Maturation and maturity indices. Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. University of California, Agricultural and Natural Resources, Publication, 3311.

Renard, C., Dupont, N. and Guillermin, P. 2007. Concentrations and characteristics of procyanidins and other phenolics in apples during fruit growth. Phytochemistry. 68: 1128-1138.

Shah, N., Khan, M., Kasi, A. and Khair, M. 2002. Post harvest and cold storage losses in apple of Balochistan. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 1: 65-66.

Siddiqui, M.W., Ayala-Zavala, J.F. and Dhua, R.S., 2015. Genotypic variation in tomatoes affecting processing and antioxidant attributes. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 55(13):1819-1835.

Scalbert, A., Johnson, I. T. and Saltmarsh, M. 2005. Polyphenols: antioxidants and beyond. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 81: 2155-2175.

Skrzynski, J. 1996. Optimum harvest date study of 4 apple cultivars in southern Poland. The Postharvest Treatment of Fruit and Vegetables. Determination and Prediction of Optimum Harvest Date of Apples and Pears. COST. 94: 61-66.

Smith, S.M., Geeson, J.D., Martin, B.K., Genge, P.M. and Everson, H.P. 1987. Modified-atmosphere retail packaging of discovery apples. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 40: 165 –178.

Veravrbeke, E.A., Verboven, P., Oostveldt, P. and Nicolai, B.M. 2003. Predication of moisture loss across the cuticle of apple (Malus sylvestris supsp. Mitis (Wallr.) during storage: part 2. Model simulations and practical applications. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30: 89-97.

Weibel, F., Widmer, F. and Husistein, A. 2004. Comparison of production systems: integrated and organic apple production. Part III: Inner quality: composition and sensory. Obst-und Weinbau. 140: 10-13

Published

2017-04-30

How to Cite

Mohebi, M., Babalar, M., Askari, M.A., Talae, A., & Ahmadi , A. (2017). Effects of harvest date on apple fruit quality at harvesting and after cold storage . Journal of Postharvest Technology, 5(2), 29–36. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jpht/article/view/15681