Evaluation of Packaging Liners in Wooden and Plastic Crates for Handling Tomatoes

Authors

  • Dari L Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Tamale-Ghana. Author
  • Nenguwo N AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, Eastern and Southern Africa, P.O. Box 10 Duluti, Arusha, Tanzania. Author
  • Afari Sefa V 2AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, Eastern and Southern Africa, P.O. Box 10 Duluti, Arusha, Tanzania. Author

Keywords:

Cost, benefit, packaging liners, plastic and wooden crates, postharvest losses quality

Abstract

Postharvest losses of tomato are high and can be attributed to a series of factors which include variety of tomato, harvest treatments,  packaging materials, handling techniques, transportation and market availability. Standard wooden crates which are perceived as large (about  90%) are used in the packing and transportation of tomatoes in Ghana which often leaves produce smashed due to the size and internal  surface of crates. This research was conducted using plastic crates (50, 30 kg) and wooden crates (large and improvised 30 kg) and  packaging liners such as jute hessian material, perforated paper and thin latex foam was used to assess which of the treatments would  preserve the fruits. From the results, all treatments had percentages of damaged and undamaged fruits at varying levels. Jute lined 30 kg  plastic and paper lined wooden crates and paper lined 50 kg both plastic and wooden proofed effective in curbing losses better than the  remaining treatments. The wooden 50 kg control crate however, had more damaged quantities at 55% than all treatments which had damages  ranging between 20 - 50. The use of crates with adequate and suitable packing liners could reduce the quantities of damaged fruits in tomato. 

References

Dandago, M.A., Ilesanmi, J.O.Y. and Tamme, V. 2017. Effects of packaging and storage conditions on quality and storage life of tomato fruits (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.) in Kura, Kano State, Nigeria. Journal of Postharvest Technology, 5(4): 71-82.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2009. FAOSTAT/FAO Statistics Division. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org (Accessed: 31 March 2013)

Horna, D., Melinda, S. and Falck-Zepeda, J. 2006. Assessing the potential economic impact of genetically modified crops in Ghana: Tomato, Garden Egg, Cabbage and in processing tomatoes. Scientia Horticulturae, 27: 189-198.

MoFA (Ministry of Food and Agriculture). 2010. Vegetable production in Ghana. Annual Report pp. 68-75.

Mwaijande, F. 2017. Farmers’ adoption and willingness to pay for post-harvest technologies in Tanzania: policy implication for enhancing food security. Journal of Postharvest Technology, 5(1): 1-6.

Ndirangu, S.N., Kanali, C., Mutwiwa, U., Kituu, G., Kamwere, M. and Mung’atu, J. 2017. Determinants of postharvest losses among high moisture content vegetables traders in Kenya. Journal of Postharvest Technology, 5(2): 37-46.

Published

2018-01-30

How to Cite

L, D., N, N., & Sefa V, A. (2018). Evaluation of Packaging Liners in Wooden and Plastic Crates for Handling Tomatoes . Journal of Postharvest Technology, 6(1), 36–40. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jpht/article/view/15433