Isolation and identification of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium) from raw and fermented camel milk during storage

Authors

  • N S Malini Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Science, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur (303122) Rajasthan, India Author
  • Pramod K. Raghav Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Science, Jayoti Vidyapeeth Women’s University, Jaipur (303122) Rajasthan, India Author

Keywords:

Lactobacilli, LAB, Bile tolerance, 16S rDNA, Bifidobacterium, probiotics

Abstract

The aim of this study is to isolate and molecularly characterize LAB present in raw and fermented milk. The sample was collected in local  areas in Jaipur Rajasthan. The identification of the selected LAB strains and their genetic relatedness was performed based on 16S rDNA  gene sequence comparisons. They differed in their different probiotic characteristics such as tolerance to acidic pH, resistance to bile  tolerance, and antibacterial activity. In conclusion, the isolates Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus durans, Lactobacillus Plantarum, and  Bifidobacterium were most probably high quality with probiotic potentials. We speculate studying the synergistic effects of bacterial  combinations might result in a more effective probiotic potential, Lactobacilli species (42.90%). Enterococcus spp isolates represented  28.26%, The remaining isolates were Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium that represented 4.87% and 2.42%. We suspect in raw and  fermented camel milk was rich in LAB and has capable probiotic potential. 

References

Hammam, A. R. A. 2019. Compositional and Therapeutic Properties of Camel Milk A Review. Dairy and Food Science Department, 31(3): 148-52.

Saeed, A. H., Ibrahim, S. 2013. Current Limitations and Challenges with Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 04(11): 73-87.

Montgomery, J. A., Frisch M. J.1999. A complete basis set model chemistry. VI. Use of density functional geometries and frequencies. The Journal of Chemical Physics Lorentzian, 110(6): 2822

Thomas, P., Cohan, F.M. 1997. Discovery and Classification of Ecological Diversity in the Bacterial World. the Role of DNA Sequence, 47(4):1145-56.

KiaHal, M., Guessas, B. 1999. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Algerian arid zone raw goats' milk. African Journal of Biotechnology, 3(6): 339-342.

Calleja, C.A., Carballo, J., Capita, R., and Bernardo, A. 2002. Comparison of the acidifying activity of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains isolated from goat's milk and Valdeteja cheese. national library of medicine, 34(2):134-8.

Bradbury, J.M. 1997. Rapid biochemical tests for characterization of the Mycoplasmatales. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. national library of medicine , 5(5): 531-4.

Briges, M.1953. The Classification of Lactobacilli by means of Physiological Tests. National library of medicine, 9(2): 234-48.

Gotcheva, V., Hristozova, E., Hristozova. T., Guo. M., Angelo. A., and Roshkova. Z. 2002. assessment of potential probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains. Food biotechnology, 16(3): 211–225.

Gomes, A.M., Pintado, M.M., Silva, J.P., and Costa, P., 2011. Storage Stability of Lactobacillus paracasei as Free Cells or Encapsulated in Alginate-Based Microcapsules in Low pH Fruit Juices. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(7): 2748-2757.

Mahrous, H., Mohamed, A., Hamza, H. A., Mongy, M. A. And Batal, A. I. 1986. Study Bacteriocin Production and Optimization Using New Isolates of Lactobacillus spp. Isolated from Some Dairy Products under Different Culture Conditions. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4(3): 1208-1234.

Savadogo, A., Traore, A., Ouattara, A.T. 2004. Antimicrobial Activities of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Isolated from Burkina Faso Fermented Milk. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 3(3): 174-179.

Published

2021-08-30

How to Cite

Malini, N.S., & Raghav , P.K. (2021). Isolation and identification of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium) from raw and fermented camel milk during storage . Journal of Postharvest Technology, 9(3), 40–46. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jpht/article/view/15192