GENDER DIFFERENCES AND MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATIONS IN THE EXTERNAL EARS OF YOUNGER ADULTS IN BANGALORE CITY: A PILOT STUDY

Authors

  • Somnita Samal B.Sc Forensic Science (Honours) Student, Department of Forensic Science, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560027,
  • Gloria Christal L Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Science, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560027
  • Mebin Wilson Thomas Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Science, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560027
  • Sajul Ramachandran B.Sc Forensic Science (Honours) Student, Department of Forensic Science, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560027,
  • R Akila B.Sc Forensic Science (Honours) Student, Department of Forensic Science, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560027,
  • Tejaswini Kubde B.Sc Forensic Science (Honours) Student, Department of Forensic Science, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560027,

Keywords:

Forensic Anthropology, Ear Print, Bangalore, Gender differences, Chi-Square test

Abstract

The external human ear is a morphologically complex structure and plays a significant role in gathering environmental sound. Forensic anthropologists can analyze variations and establish the use of the ear as a biometric by using information regarding its diverse morphological characteristics in healthy individuals. The current research attempts to ascertain gender differences and morphological variation in the ear print characteristics of the Bangalore population. 130 young adults (58 males and 72 females) aged between 18 to 25 residing in Bangalore were considered for the study through purposive sampling technique. Participants were made to paste their ears slowly and lightly on the glass smeared with printer’s ink and then transferred to the specified space on the A4-sized (70gsm) paper. Ear indices such as ear length, ear width, lobule length, and lobule width from both ears were measured three times in succession, and the mean value was considered. The present study suggests that the oval ear predominated in male and female participants, followed by a rounded shape. The Chi-square test for independence indicates a very high association between gender and the left ear shape with a moderate effect size, and an association exists between gender and the right ear shape with a moderate effect size. The Chi-square test of independence demonstrated an association between ear shape and gender for both sexes and the independent sample t-test implies a significant difference in the features of the left and right ears in male and female participants. These findings will cater to ear print identification, individualization, and classification. 

References

Li SZ. Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Encyclopedia of Biometrics. 2009.

Meijerman L, Sholl S, De Conti F, Giacon M, Van Der Lugt C, Drusini A, et al. Exploratory study on classification and individualisation of earprints. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;140(1):91–9.

Dhanda V, Badhan JS, Garg RK. Studies on the development of latent ear prints and their significance in personal identification. Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych. 2011;88:285–95.

Meijerman L. Inter- and intra-individual variation in earprints [Internet]. 2006. Available from: https:// scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/ 1887/4292

Kaushal N, Kaushal P. Human Earprints: a Review. J Biom Biostat. 2011;02(05).

Rani D, Krishan K, Sahani R, Baryah N, Kanchan T. Evaluation of Morphological Characteristics of the Human Ear in Young Adults. J Craniofac Surg.2020;31(6):1692-8

Singh P, Purkait R. Observations of external ear-An Indian study. HOMO- J Comp Hum Biol [Internet]. 2009;60(5):461–72. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.08.002

Purkait R, Singh P. Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: A study of adult Indian men. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(4):372–9.

Purkait R. Role of External Ear in Establishing Personal Identity - A Short Review. Austin J Forensic Sci Criminol [Internet]. 2015;2(2):1023. Available from: https://austinpublishinggroup.com/ forensicscience-criminology/fulltext/ajfsc-v2-

id1023.php

PS L, K O, NA I. A Preliminary Study on Earprint Identification among Young Adults in Malaysia. J Forensic Sci Criminol. 2017;5(2).

Rubio O, Galera V, Alonso MC. Morphological variability of the earlobe in a Spanish population sample. HOMO- J Comp Hum Biol [Internet]. 2017;68(3):222–35. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jchb.2017.03.007

Purkait R. External ear: An analysis of its uniqueness. Egypt J Forensic Sci [Internet]. 2016;6(2):99–107. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejfs.2016.03.002

Verma P, Sandhu HK, Verma KG, Goyal S, Sudan M, Ladgotra A. Morphological variations and biometrics of ear: An aid to personal identification. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(5):ZC138–42.

Cameriere R, DeAngelis D, Ferrante L. Ear identification: A pilot study. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(4):1010–4.

Guyomarc’h P, Stephan CN. The Validity of Ear Prediction Guidelines Used in Facial Approximation. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(6):1427–41.

Priyanka, Singh; Ruma P. Anthropological study of human auricle. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2006;28(2):46–8.

Krishan K, Kanchan T, Thakur S. A study of morphological variations of the human ear for its applications in personal identification. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2019;9(1):0–10.

Van der Lugt C. (Ears and) earprints, individualising crime scene marks?! Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych. 2001;46:38–45.

Alfred V. Iannarelli. Ear Identification (Forensic Identification Series). Paramont Pub; 1989.

Attalla SM, Kumar KA, Hussain N. Study of the Ear Shape and the Lobule Attachement among the Adult Malaysian Population at Shah Alam. 2020;7(3):5417–25.

Verma K, Bhawana J, Vikas K. Morphological Variation of ear for Individual Identification in Forensic Cases: A study of an Indian Population Forensic identification View project Forensic Entomology View project. 2014;2(1):1–8. Available from: www.isca.me

Chattopadhyay PK, Bhatia S. Morphological examination of ear: A study of an Indian population. Leg Med [Internet]. 2009;11(SUPPL. 1):S190–3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.legalmed.2009.02.057

Dinkar AD, Sambyal SS. Person identification in Ethnic Indian Goans using ear biometrics and neural

networks. Forensic Sci Int [Internet]. 2012 Nov;223(1–3):373.e1-373.e13. Available from: https:/ / l i n k i n g h u b . e l s e v i e r. c o m / r e t r i e v e / p i i / S0379073812003957

Deopa D, Thakkar HK, Prakash C, Niranjan R, Barua MP. Anthropometric measurements of external ear of medical students in Uttarakhand region. J Anat Soc India [Internet]. 2013;62(1):79–83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003- 2778(13)80018-4

Bozkir MG, Karakaº P, Yavuz M, Dere F. Morphometry of the external ear in our adult population. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(1):81–5.

Salama M, Rathan R. Auricle Morphometry Among Arab Students in Gulf Medical University. 2020;(September).

Brucker MJ, Patel J, Sullivan PK. A morphometric study of the external ear: Age- and sex-related differences. Vol. 112, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2003. p. 647–52.

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

GENDER DIFFERENCES AND MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATIONS IN THE EXTERNAL EARS OF YOUNGER ADULTS IN BANGALORE CITY: A PILOT STUDY . (2023). Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 40(1), 53–58. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jfmt/article/view/17759