Towards Standardizing Medicolegal Practices In India: Challenges and Solutions
Keywords:
Evidence, India, Medico-Legal Case, National Medicolegal Code and Manual (MLMC)Abstract
In India, Medicolegal cases require meticulous examination and evidence collection to support legal investigations, yet the absence of a standardized national medicolegal code leads to inconsistent practices. Currently, only a few states and institutions have developed their own codes, leaving many healthcare facilities, particularly in resource-limited settings, reliant on outdated or ad-hoc protocols. This variability complicates workflows, especially for junior consultants, medical graduates working in district hospitals performing medicolegal duties and foreign-trained medical graduates unfamiliar with Indian procedures, risking suboptimal evidence collection and documentation. A national medicolegal code is pro posed to standardize protocols for examination, sample preservation, and stakeholder responsibilities, ensuring unifor mity and clarity. Such a code would align with updated criminal laws, address logistical challenges like evidence storage, and incorporate guidelines for diverse medicolegal scenarios, including sexual violence, autopsies, and disaster victim identification. Despite challenges in enforceability due to state jurisdiction over law and order, voluntary adoption by states, endorsed by the Union government, could streamline practices, ultimately improving medicolegal service quality and aiding the justice delivery system across India. This review article discusses several practical difficulties in medicole gal practice, challenges in creating a national medicolegal code, and proposes recommendations to move forward.References
National Health Systems Resource Centre. Medicolegal issues: guidelines to medical officers [Internet]. New Delhi: NHSRC; 2021 [cited 2025 Apr 2]. Available from: https://nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/medico_legal.pdf
Kumar IK. Appreciation of evidence in suits [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Apr 2]. Available from: https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/sites/default/files/workshop%20III.pdf
Dogra TD, Sarma RK. Medicolegal manual AIIMS Delhi [Internet]. 1990 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://tddogra.blogspot.com/2014/02/medicolegal-manual-all-india-institute.html
Owen RL, Lynch MJ. Body recovery. In: Payne-James J, Byard RW, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. p. 437–43.
Pollanen MS. On the strength of evidence in forensic pathology. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016;12(1):95–7.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal. Medico-legal manual [Internet]. Bhopal: AIIMS; 2020 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://aiimsbhopal.edu.in/AIIMSFiles/officialDownload/Medico_Legal_Manual_Eng.pdf
Chauhan SR, Goldar K. Medico-legal cases and medical negligence [Internet]. New Delhi: Employees’ State Insurance Corporation; 2012 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://www.esic.nic.in/Publications/ESICMedicoLegalBook.pdf
Government of Haryana, Health Department. Haryana medicolegal manual [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://kaithal.haryanapolice.gov.in/writereaddata/Images/pdf/pkl96.pdf
Government of Punjab, Health Department. Medicolegal manual [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://health.punjab.gov.in/sites/default/files/Punjab%20Medicolegal%20Manual%20jan30.pdf
Government of Kerala, Home Department. Kerala medico-legal code [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://dhs.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/code.pdf
Tamilmani K, Manivasagan M. Tamil Nadu medico-legal manual [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://tnsfmes.com/tn-medicolegal-manual
Moritz AR. Classical mistakes in forensic pathology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1981;2(4):299–308.
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. The coroner’s autopsy: do we deserve better? London: NCEPOD; 2006.
National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009.
Peterson GF, Clark SC; National Association of Medical Examiners. Forensic autopsy performance standards. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006;27(3):200–25.
Mangin P, Bonbled F, Väli M, Luna A, Bajanowski T, Hougen HP, et al. European Council of Legal Medicine accreditation of forensic pathology services in Europe. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(2):395–403.
Mathur S, Patel D, Kumar A. Uniform and inclusive autopsy proforma in India: a cross-sectional study and recommendations thereof. Int J Health Res Medico Leg Pract. 2021;7(1):65–71.
Meilia PDI, Freeman MD, Herkutanto, Zeegers MP. Diversity in taxonomy, definitions, scope and roles in forensic medicine: implications for evidence-based practice. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018;14(4):460–8.
Meilia PDI, Herkutanto, Atmadja DS, Cordner S, Eriksson A, Kubat B, et al. The PERFORM-P (Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in Forensic Medicine—Pathology version). Forensic Sci Int. 2021;327:110962.
J Kajendran vs The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore & Ors. HCP No. 2182 of 2022. Madras High Court; order dated 15 Jul 2024.
Government of Kerala, Home Department. Medico-legal code: orders issued [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2025 May 2]. Available from: https://dhs.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/order221011.pdf
Directorate of Forensic Science Laboratories, Government of Karnataka. Timeline fixed for receiving samples for analysis at forensic science laboratories. Letter No. Staff(3)/10/NyaViPra/2019-20; dated 20 Apr 2021.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Guidelines and protocols for medico-legal care for survivors/victims of sexual violence [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 May 2]. Available from: https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/953522324.pdf
Millo T, Jaiswal AK, Behera C. Collection, preservation and forwarding of biological samples for toxicological analysis in medicolegal autopsy cases: a review. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2008;30(2):96–100.
Khan I, Shakeel M, Sharma G. Viscera preservation for post-mortem toxicological analysis: a review. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2016;38(2):241–5.
Manoj D, Rajesh J, Devnath GP, Rajendiran G, James RI, Johnson LR. Postmortem toxicology analysis in India: rethinking the future. J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021;38(2):15–22.
Cordner SM. The role of the second post-mortem examination. Med Sci Law. 1985;53(1):24–8.
Milo T. Second postmortem: a need for medicolegal guideline in India. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2008;30(3):176–7.
Dineja R. DNA sampling methods and extraction techniques in forensic odontogenetics: a review. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2023;45(4):434–7.
Srivastava AK, Kumar A, Kumar A, Srivastava A. Mass disaster: identification of victims with special emphasis on dental evidences. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2015;37(2):190–5.
Adamovic N, Howes LM, White R, Julian R. Understanding the challenges of disaster victim identification: perspectives of Australian forensic practitioners. Forensic Sci Res. 2023;8(2):107–15.
Byard RW, Winskog C. Potential problems arising during international disaster victim identification exercises. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6(1):1–2.
De Boer HH, Roberts J, Delabarde T, Mundorff AZ, Blau S. Disaster victim identification operations with fragmented, burnt or commingled remains: experience-based recommendations. Forensic Sci Res. 2020;5(3):191–201.
Colville-Ebeling B, Freeman MD, Banner J, Lynnerup N. Autopsy practice in forensic pathology: evidence-based or experience-based? J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;22:33–6.
Jain AK, Dubey BP, Garg SP, Nigam M. A guide to writing medical reports vis-à-vis victims of torture. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2009;31(3):289–90.
Patowary AJ. Autopsy in cases of custodial torture: Indian perspective. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2017;39(2):190–7.
Akhade SP, Kothari P, Sabale PR, Chavali KH. Evaluation of sexual potency of male in context of current Indian legal system: review and recommendations. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2023;45(1):95–100.
Setia P, Shekhawat RS. Photography in forensic medicine: guidelines and recommendations in the Indian perspective. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2016;38(1):72–6.
Gouse S, Karnam S, Girish HC, Murgod S. Forensic photography: prospect through the lens. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(1):2–4.
Henham AP, Lee KA. Photography in forensic medicine. J Audiov Media Med. 1994;17(1):15–20.
Sudha R, Rajasekhar P, Rupesh AK, Deepak GC. Need for national code for ethical and scientific autopsy practice. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2017;39(4):420–5.
Das S, Das A, Gupta S, Kothakota JN, Chowdhuri S. A new model of integrated forensic database in India: road to future. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2024;46(1):99–102.
Khandekar I, Tirpude B, Murkey P, Pawar V. Development of clinical forensic medicine in India: a need of time. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2010;32(1):85–90.
Gorea RK. Comprehensive forensic nursing care of victims and families. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2022;44(4):2–5.
Sundaragiri S. Medico-legal cases need a more professional approach. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2015;37(3):302–4.
Kadam SS, Akhade S, Desouza K. Autopsy practice and occupational hazards: a review for safety and prevention. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2015;37(2):196–201.
Abdalla de Oliveira Cardoso T, Bueno de Azevedo Neto FP, Cynamon Cohen S, Chein Bueno de Azevedo D. Biosafety in autopsy room: a systematic review. Rev Public Health. 2019;53:634–42.
