THE MEDICO-LEGAL ISSUES OF SNAKE ENVENOMATIONS IN INDIA
Keywords:
Snake, envenomation, forensic, venom, insuranceAbstract
World Health Organization (WHO) has aptly recognized snake envenomation as a neglected tropical disease because it is a medical emergency in tropical regions. But beyond that it is also a fairly ignored medico legal scourge, particularly in India. Being an accidental unnatural death, a fatal snake envenomation usually invites an inquest. The forensic science laboratories (FSLs) are required to perform a chemical analysis of post-mortem exhibits of unfortunate victims and to conclusively report the likelihood of snake envenomation. The positive chemical reports confirming the snake envenomation will be required for ascertaining the cause of death and thereby advocating the disbursement of insurance money. In this study, we collected the data on status of snake venom analysis in FSLs of India. State sponsored welfare schemes providing the financial assistant to victims of snake envenomation of Haryana state of India were also identified and their data on disbursal of insurance money to families of fatal snake envenomation victims was enquired. The data from Indian FSLs suggests the lack of standard protocol for venom analysis from post-mortem samples. Most laboratories don’t perform such analysis due to lack of facilities. Enquiries from state authorities revealed that in many cases the insurance money could not be disbursed to families of fatal snake envenomation victims due to lack of confirmatory reports from FSLs.
References
1. Arnold C. The snakebite fight. Nature. 2016; 537: 26- 28.
2. Bendbhar RD, More BP, Malve MK, Pingale SS, Khot BR. Snake Venom - Facts Figures And Social Perspective. World J Pharm Res. 2014; 3: 616-620.
3. Bhargava S, Kaur R, Singh R. Epidemiological profile of snake-bite cases from Haryana: A five year (2011- 2015) retrospective study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018; 54: 9-13. DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2017.12.004
4. Brunda G, Sashidhar RB, Sarin RK. Use of egg yolk antibody (IgG) as an immunoanalytical tool in detection of Indian cobra (Naja naja naja) venom in biological sample of forensic origin. Toxicon. 2006; 48: 183-194.
5. Chippaux JP. Snake bite epidemiology in Benin (West Africa). Toxicon. 1988; 27: 37. DOI.org/10.1186/s40409- 016-0063-x
6. Chippaux JP. Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease! A letter to the editor. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2017; 23: 38.
7. Minton SA. Present tests for detection of snake venom: Clinical applications. Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16: 932– 937. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80736-9
8. Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, Bhatia P, Dhingra N, Jotkar R, Whitaker R, Jha P. Snakebite mortality in India: A nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011; 5: 1-8. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pntd.0001018.
9. Snow RW. The prevalence and morbidity of snake bite and treatment seeking behaviour among a rural Kenyan population. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1994; 88: 665-671. DOI: 10.1080/00034983.1994.11812919
10. Theakston R, Laing G. Diagnosis of Snakebite and the Importance of Immunological Tests in Venom Research. Toxins. 2014: 6: 1667–1695. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/toxins6051667
11. Venkatraman V. Snakebites under-reported in India. Nature India. 2012. Available at: https:// www.natureasia.com/en/nindia/article/10.1038/ nindia.2012.69 ; DOI:10.1038/nindia.2012.69
12. Verma KL, Singh AP, Sinha S. New forensic challenges and detection of snake venom. Forensic Toxicol. 2018; 36: 537-539 https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11419-018-0411-3
13. Warrell DA. Snake bite. Lancet. 2010; 375: 77–88. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61754-2
14. Warrell DA. WHO/SEARO Guidelines for the clinical management of snake bites in the Southeast Asian region. SE J Trop Med Publ Hlth. 1999; 30: 1–85.
