ROLE OF THANATOMICROBIOME PROFILING IN ESTIMATING THE POSTMORTEM INTERVAL (PMI) OF THE CADAVERS: A REVIEW
Keywords:
Forensic thanatology, microbiome, PMI estimations, accuracy and reliability, medicolegal death investigationsAbstract
The post-mortem interval or time since death holds great importance in forensic investigations. This window of time between the death and discovery helps narrow down suspects and events by providing a direction for investigation to follow. Precise estimation of PMI is a difficult task. But what if we ask the dead about it? With microbial presence being ten times more than that of human cells in our body, why not seek their help? Ample of data exists about the microbial communities present in a living body. But of late, thanatomicrobiome has come up as a potential microbial marker to fill the gaps pertaining to the time and location of death. The present review article aims to focus the importance of thanatomicrobiome for forensic PMI estimations, its precision accuracy, objectivity and feasibility in the field. Besides, we aim to understand microbial community profiling technique that can be used for isolating essential microbiome data from postmortem samples. Finally, a glimpse about the future track and potential improvements that are possible in the field. Although various studies have identified the role of bacterial communities in PMI estimations, there remain some obstacles for their practical forensic use.
References
1. Benbow ME, Lewis AJ, Tomberlin JK, Pechal JL. Seasonal necrophagous insect community assembly during vertebrate carrion decomposition. J Med Entomol. 2013;50(2):440-450.
2. Blekhman R, Goodrich JK, Huang K, et al. Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):191.
3. Byrd J, Castner J. Forensic Entomology: The Utility of Arthropods in Legal Investigations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010.
4. Cai J, Guo Y, Zha L, Guo J. The Role of the Microbiome in PMI Estimation. In: Komang Ralebitso-Senior T (ed): Forensic Ecogenomics: the Application of Microbial Ecology Analyses in Forensic Contexts. Chapter 3, Academic Press; Tees Valley, United Kingdom. 2018, p. 113-131
5. Can I, Javan GT, Pozhitkov AE, Noble PA. Distinctive thanatomicrobiome signatures found in the blood and internal organs of humans. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;106:1-7.
6. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4516-4522.
7. Cecchini F, Iacumin L, Fontanot M, Comi G, Manzano M. Identification of the unculturable bacteria Candidatus arthromitus in the intestinal content of trouts using Dot blot and Southern blot techniques. Vet Microbiol. 2012;156(3-4):389-394.
8. Clarke TH, Gomez A, Singh H, Nelson KE, Brinkac LM. Integrating the microbiome as a resource in the forensics toolkit. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;30:141- 147.
9. Deel H, Bucheli S, Belk A, Odgen S, Lynne A, O Carter D, Knight R, Metcalf JL. Using microbiome tools for estimating the postmortem interval. In B Budowle, S Morse and Schutzer (ed): Microbial Forensics 3e. Elsevier, San Diego, 2019, 2018.
10. Finley SJ, Benbow ME, Javan GT. Microbial communities associated with human decomposition and their potential use as postmortem clocks. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(3):623-632.
11. Finley SJ, Pechal JL, Benbow ME, Robertson BK, Javan GT. Microbial Signatures of Cadaver Gravesoil During Decomposition. Microb Ecol. 2016;71(3):524- 529.
12. Forbes SL. Decomposition chemistry in a burial environment. In: Tibbett, M., Carter, D.O. (Eds.), Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Biological Effects of Buried Human Remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 203–224, 2008.
13. Galloway A. The process of decomposition: a model from the Arizona-Sonoran desert.In WD Haglund and MH Sorg (ed): Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997: 139-150
14. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312(5778):1355-1359.
15. Gill-King H. Chemical and ultrastructural aspects of decomposition. In WD Haglund and MH Sorg (ed): Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997.
16. Harper-Owen R, Dymock D, Booth V, Weightman AJ, Wade WG. Detection of unculturable bacteria in periodontal health and disease by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(5):1469-1473.
17. https://www.slideshare.net/faizahmad1806253/post mortem-interval-70862628
18. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. 2012;486(7402):215-221.
19. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207-214.
20. Hyde ER, Haarmann DP, Lynne AM, Bucheli SR, Petrosino JF. The living dead: bacterial community structure of a cadaver at the onset and end of the bloat stage of decomposition. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77733.
21. Hyde ER, Haarmann DP, Petrosino JF, Lynne AM, Bucheli SR. Initial insights into bacterial succession during human decomposition. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(3):661-671.
22. Janda JM, Abbott SL. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(9):2761-2764.
23. Javan GT, Finley SJ, Abidin Z, Mulle JG. The Thanatomicrobiome: A Missing Piece of the Microbial Puzzle of Death. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:225.
24. Javan GT, Finley SJ, Can I, Wilkinson JE, Hanson JD, Tarone AM. Human Thanatomicrobiome Succession and Time Since Death. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29598.
25. Jenks PJ. Sequencing microbial genomes—what will it do for microbiology?. J Med Microbiol. 1998;47(5):375-382.
26. Jovel J, Patterson J, Wang W, et al. Characterization of the Gut Microbiome Using 16S or Shotgun Metagenomics. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:459.
27. Ley RE, Bäckhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(31):11070- 11075.
28. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with
obesity. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1022-1023.
29. Metcalf JL, Wegener Parfrey L, Gonzalez A, et al. A microbial clock provides an accurate estimate of the postmortem interval in a mouse model system. Elife. 2013;2:e01104.
30. Metcalf JL. Estimating the postmortem interval using microbes: Knowledge gaps and a path to technology adoption. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;38:211-218.
31. NIH Human Microbiome Project. https:// hmpdacc.org/hmp/overview/ accessed on 01.8.2020
32. Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Luna RA, Gibbs RA, Versalovic J. Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clin Chem. 2009;55(5):856-866.
33. Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Are We Really Vastly Outnumbered? Revisiting the Ratio of Bacterial to Host Cells in Humans. Cell. 2016;164(3):337-340.
34. Stewart EJ. Growing unculturable bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(16):4151-4160.
35. Vasák M. Dynamic metal-thiolate cluster structure of metallothioneins. Environ Health Perspect. 1986; 65:193-197.
36. Vass AA. Beyond the grave- understanding human decomposition. Microbiol Today. 2001;28: 190–192.
37. Wade W. Unculturable bacteria—the uncharacterized organisms that cause oral infections. J R Soc Med. 2002;95(2):81-83.
38. Wolff M, Uribe A, Ortiz A, Duque P. A preliminary study of forensic entomology in Medellín, Colombia. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;120(1-2):53-59.
39. Zhou W, Bian Y. Thanatomicrobiome composition profiling as a tool for forensic investigation. Forensic Sci Res. 2018;3(2):105-110.
