DECISION MAKING IN MEDICO-LEGAL OPINION

Authors

  • Arvind kumar MD (Forensic Medicine), Professor, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi.
  • Mahesh Kumar MD (Forensic Medicine), Assistant Professor, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi.
  • Sukhdeep Singh MD (Forensic Medicine), Professor, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi.

Keywords:

Medicolegal opinion, Decision making Subjectivity, Third party review, Typology of opinion

Abstract

 Opinion expression is an important part of medico- legal writing. Recent judgment on Criminal Appeal No529  of 2010 has highlighted the importance of Investigating Officer and Medical Officer in criminal cases. This paper discusses many types of opinion and their critical analysis. The physician should provide reasons for the basis of the opinion.

References

R. Sanders, The executive Decision making Process:

Identifying Problems and Assessing Outcomes

(Westport, CT: Quorum, 1999)

Forensic pathology 2nd ed. Vincent J. DiMaio &

Dominick DiMaio 2001, CRC Press; the autopsy report:

pp.551

B. K. Mahajan, Methods in Biostatistics, 6th ed. (Jaypee

Brothers, 1997), chapter 1, pp. 7

H.A. Simon, Administrative Behavior, 4th ed. (New York:

Free Press, 1997); and M. Augier, “Simon says:

Bounded Rationality Matters,” Journal of

Management Inquiry, September 2001, pp.268-75

Robbins S.P, Decide & Conquer: Making Winning

Decisions and Taking Control of Your Life (Upper

Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times/Prentice Hall, 2004),

p. 13

Harrison E.F, The Managerial Decision-making Process,5

th ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1999), pp. 1-19

March J.G, A Primer on Decision Making (New York:

Free Press,1994), pp. 2-7; and D. Hardman and C.

Harries, “How Rational are we?” Psychologist,

February 2002, pp. 76-79

Comack E, Balfour G. The power to criminalize: violence,

inequality and the law. Black Point, Fernwood

Publishing, 2004.

Baron J, Hershey JC. Outcome bias in decision

evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54:569-579

LaBine S.J, LaBine G. Determinations negligence and

the hindsight bias. Law Hum Behav 1996; 20: 501-516

DeKeyser V, Woods DD. Fixation errors: failures to

revise situation assessment in dynamic and risky

systems. In: Colombo AG, Saiz de Bustamante A,

editors. System reliability assessment. Dordrecht, The

Netherlands: Kluwer, 1990;231-251

The forensic autopsy, chapter 1, pp. 9, Forensic

Pathology, Bernard Night, 2nd ed.1996

Ostojic L. Transforming a body of knowledge: an

exploratory study of the use of DNA evidence in sexual

assault investigations [thesis]. Vancouver, Simon

Fraser University, 1999

Savan B. Science under siege: the myth of objectivity

in scientific research. Toronto, House of Anansi

Press,1988

Jagadeesh N, The status of forensic medicine in India;

Indian J Med Ethics.2008 Oct-Dec;5(4)

Parikh C.K, A colour atlas of medicolegal

postmortems and forensic pathology, 2nd ed. 1989(CBS

Publishers & Distributors) Autopsy protocol, pp.161

Josang A. Artificial Reasoning with Subjective

Logic. Proceedings of the Second Australian

Workshop on Commonsense Reasoning, Perth 1997

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_logic#

Doxastic_logic. Web page accessed on 28.01.2010

Tversky and Kahneman D, “Judgment under

Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science,

September 1974, pp.1124-31

Published

2018-01-30

How to Cite

DECISION MAKING IN MEDICO-LEGAL OPINION . (2018). Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 34(2), 48–53. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jfmt/article/view/17469