Feasibility of flower crops under coconut based cropping system in coastal ecosystem of Maharashtra State

Authors

  • V V Shinde ICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
  • S L Ghavale ICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
  • H P Maheswarappa ICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
  • S M Wankhede ICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India

Keywords:

Coconut, intercropping, flower crops, lily, heliconia

Abstract

Field experiment carried out at ICAR-AICRP on palms at Regional Coconut Research Station Bhatye, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Dist. Ratnagiri (MS) during 2013 to 2015 with flower crop combinations of T1- coconut alone (monocrop), T2- coconut + Jasminum sambac, T3- coconut + Jasminum multiflorum, T4- coconut + Lily spp., T5- coconut + Heliconia spp. and T6 - coconut + Michelia champaka, according to two years of data, showed that the lily flower recorded 1683811 numbers of spikes ha-1, Jasminum multiflorum recorded 48656 kg ha-1, Heliconia spp. recorded 96982.5 number of spikes ha-1, Jasminum Sambac recorded 1123.2 kg ha-1 follwed by Michelia champaka with only 12690 number of flowers only. In respect of economics, coconut +Lily spp. system recorded the highest gross return of Rs. 12,19,962/- ha-1 followed by Rs. 7,63,197/- in coconut + Jasminum multiflorum system. Coconut +Heliconia spp. recorded Rs. 6,37,495.25, coconut +Jasminum sambac Rs. 553102.53 and coconut +Michelia champaka the minimum gross return of Rs. 255672.00. The gross income realised in the monocropping of coconut was of Rs. 195300.00. The coconut nut yield realised during 2014-15 in the intercropping garden was 165 nuts palm-1 year-1 whereas in monocropping it was 96 nuts palm-1 year-1. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bopaiah, B.M. and Shetty, H.S. 1991. Microbiology and fertility in coconut based mixed farming and coconut monocropping systems. Tropical Agriculture, 68:135-38.

Ghosh, D.K. and Hore, J.K. 2007. Economics of different coconut based cropping models under alluvial plains of West Bengal. Indian Coconut Journal, 37:9-13.

Ghosh D.K., Hore J.K, Bandopadhyay A, and Maji, M.K. 2008. Effect of spacing and seed corm size of elephant foot yam on economics of a coconut based cropping system. Journal Crop and Weed, 4:15-19.

Ghosh D.K. and Bandopadhyay A. 2011. Productivity and profitability of coconut based cropping systems with fruits and black pepper in West Bengal. Journal of Crop and Weed, 7:134-137.

Girijadevi, L. and Nair, M.V. 2003. Economics of coconut based intercropping systems. Journal Plantation Crops, 31:45-47. Hore, J.K., Bandhopadhyay, A., and Ghosh, D.K. 2007. Prospect of intercropping with coconut in West Bengal. Indian Coconut Journal, 38:2-4.

Maheswarappa, H.P., Hegde, M.R., Dhanapal, R. and Biddappa, C.C. 1998. Mixed farming in coconut garden- Its impact on soil physical, chemical properties, coconut nutrition and yield. Journal Plantation Crops, 26:139-143.

Rethinam, P. 1990. Cropping system involving plantation crops. In:Plantation Based Multiple Cropping System (Eds. Bandopadhyay, A.K., Michel, R.S., Gangwar, B. and Dagar, J.C.). CARI, Port Blair.

Sairam, C.V., Gopalasundaram, P. and Umamaheswari, L. 1997. Capital requirements for adoption of coconut based intercropping system in Kerala. Indian Coconut Journal, 27:2- 4.

Sharma, U.J. and Chowdhury, D. 2002. Synergistic effect of high density multiple cropping on soil productivity and yield of base crop (coconut). Indian Coconut Journal, 33:18-22.

Published

2020-08-22

How to Cite

Shinde, V.V., Ghavale, S.L., Maheswarappa, H.P., & Wankhede , S.M. (2020). Feasibility of flower crops under coconut based cropping system in coastal ecosystem of Maharashtra State . Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 15(1), 33–36. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/jefa/article/view/8060