Ecofriendly management practices to combat mycotoxins contamination in maize

Authors

  • K Ajithkumar Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur - 584 104
  • M K Naik University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga - 577 201
  • A S Savitha Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur – 584 104, Karnataka, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00072.7

Keywords:

Aspergillus flavus, Bioagents, Fusarium verticillioides, Mycotoxin

Abstract

Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by Aspergillus and Fusarium species are toxic to humans and domestic animals. About seven seed treating fungicides namely captan, carbendazin, azoxystrobin, tebuconazole, trifloxystrobin, mancozeb 50 per cent + carbendazim 25 per cent WS (Sprint) and trifloxystrobin 25 per cent and tebuconazole 50 per cent (Nativo 75 WG) Among the seed treating fungicides tested against the seed-borne A. flavus and F. verticillioides in growth chamber conditions, seed treated with captan has recorded maximum germination (66.67%), maximum shoot length and shoot weight of 41.00 cm and 4.8 g, respectively. The management results revealed that the minimum per cent infection was noticed in neem cake application at 250 kg ha–1 + 250 kg FYM enriched with consortium of Trichoderma harzianum at 2.5 kg ha–1 and Pseudomonas fluorescens at 2.5 kg ha–1 followed by foliar spray with carbendazim (0.1%) at 60 days after sowing (DAS) (4.91) along with maximum yield and benefit cost ratio of 60.59 q ha–1, 3.34 and 57.61 q ha–1, 3.15 in first and second circumstances, respectively. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, A.J., Habibzadegah-tari, P. and Tepper, C.S. 1988. Molecular studies on the role of root surface agglutinin in adherence and colonization by Pseudomonas putida. Applied Environment Microbiology, 54: 375-380.

Anonymous, 2017. Special report on maize, National Collateral Management Services Limited (NCML), p 13.

Anonymous, 2018. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2017, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, New Delhi, p 511. Anonymous, 2019. Top 10 largest maize producing states in India. The Daily Records, Latest news around the globe, 2nd January, 2019, www.the daily records. com.

Chhetri, B. 2016. Studies on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) under sole and intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management and moisture conservation practices. Ph. D. Thesis, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, p 237.

Falloon, R.E. 2012. Fungicide seed treatment of maize to improve establishment and control seedling pathogens. NewZealand Journal of Experiment Agriculture, 10: 197-202.

Guruprasad, G.R., Naik, M.K., Sudini, H.K., Sunkad, G., Bheemanna, M. and Shankergoud, I. 2018. Estimation of aflatoxin content in chilli samples collected from cold storage and market. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7: 3228-3232.

Ibrahim, E.A.M. 2015. Effect of some treatments on seed health and viability of soybean. Plant Pathology Journal, 14: 158- 167.

Kommedahl, T. and Williams, P.H. 1983. Challenging problems in plant health. American Phytopathological Society, p: 538. Kumar, V., Basu, M.S. and Rajendran, T.P. 2008. Mycotoxin research and mycoflora in some commercially important agricultural commodities. Crop Protection, 27: 891-905. Manjunatha, H., Naik, M.K. and Rangeshwaran, R. 2012. Identification of fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates with potential biocontrol activity from the rhizosphere of crops. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 6: Peer reviewed. Naik, M.K., Rajalaxmi, K. and Amaresh, Y.S. 2013. Search for 2,4 DAPG positive genes in fluorescent Pseudomonads and their exploitation for sustainable disease management. In: Recent advances in biofertilizers and bio-fungicides for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings 3rd Asian PGPR Conference, pp: 21-24.

Palumbo J.D., O’Keeffe, T.L. and Abbas, H.K. 2007. Isolation of maize soil and rhizosphere bacteria with antagonistic activity against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides. Journal of Food Protection, 70: 1615-1621.

Ranganathswamy, M., Naik, S.T., Motagi, B.N. and Sudini, H. 2017. Eco-friendly approaches for Aspergillus flavus Link Ex. Fries management in groundnut. The Bioscan, 12: 1993- 1998.

Reddy, S.E.C., Sudhakar, C. and Eswara Reddy, N.P. 2011. Aflatoxin contamination in groundnut induced by Aspergillus flavus type fungi: A critical review. International Journal of Applied, Biological and Pharmaceutical Technology, 2: 180-192.

Reshma, P., Naik, M.K., Aiyaz, M., Niranjana, S.R., Chennappa, G., Shaikh, S.S. and Sayyed, R.Z. 2018. Induced systemic resistance by 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol positive fluorescent Pseudomonas strains against rice sheath blight. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 56: 207-212.

Schisler, D.A., Khan, N.I. and Boehm, M.J. 2002a. Biological control of Fusarium head blight of wheat and deoxynivalenol levels in grain via use of microbial antagonists. Advances in Experiment and Medical Biology, 504: 53-69.

Schisler, D.A., Khan, N.I., Boehm, M.J. and Slininger, P.J. 2002b. Greenhouse and field evaluation of biological control of Fusarium head blight on durum wheat. Plant Disease, 86: 1350-1356.

Shentu, X.P., Liu, W.P., Zhang, X.H., Yu, X.P. and Zhang, C.X. 2013. The Elicitation effect of pathogenic fungi on trichodermin production by Trichoderma brevicompactum. The Scientific World Journal. ID 607102, 6 pages.

Van Loon, L.C., Bakker, P.A.H.M. and Pieterse, C.M.J. 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 36: 453-483.

Vinodkumar, N.B., Bagwan and Diwakar Singh. 2009. On-farm evaluation of cultural practices for management of aflatoxin in groundnut. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 39: 271-274.

Published

2022-12-24

How to Cite

Ajithkumar, K., Naik, M.K., & Savitha, A.S. (2022). Ecofriendly management practices to combat mycotoxins contamination in maize . Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 17(2), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00072.7