Performance of Apis cerana colonies with queens reared by different methods for revival of traditional beekeeping in Kashmir valley
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00064.8Keywords:
Performance, Apis ceran, queen revival, rearing methods, traditionalAbstract
Kashmir valley has enormous potential of beekeeping. The colony performance of Apis cerana indica is determined by its foraging efficiency. The economy of the colony depends on the performance of the colony. The focus of the study was to determine the queen bee rearing techniques, accurate measurement in selection and offer the best technique in queen bee rearing for beekeepers. The experiment, a first step in the valley, was carried out in farmers apiary at Harwan Srinagar-Kashmir during 2018-19 with three bee raising methods viz., Miller (T1), Division (T2) and Supersedure (T3). The efficiency and potential of supersedure queen was determined in comparison to other naturally raised queen in Apis cerana colonies. The results showed that supersedure queens performed well as naturally produced queen. The highest rate of mating percentage (83.33%) was recorded in supersedure method (T3). The maximum brood area (1024 cm2) during 2nd fortnight of April, pollen area (198.00 cm2) in 1st week of March and honey store area (2422 cm2) during 1st fortnight of May, were recorded in split method of queen rearing (T2). The minimum brood area (844.00 cm2) was recorded in supersedure method of queen rearing (T3). Significant differences were observed among all the treatments.
Downloads
References
funded project. We are thankful to the funding agency for financial support.
REFERENCES
Abbasi, K.H., Shafiq, M., Ahmad, K.J., Razzaq, A., Saleem, M. and Ullah, M.A. 2015. Performance of larval grafted queen vs queen produced through natural method in Apis mellifera. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studes, 3: 47-49.
Abrol, D.P., Bhagat, R.M., Sharma, D. 2005. Mass rearing of Apis cerana F. queen. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 8: 309317. Dodologlu, A., Emsen. B and Genc, F. 2004. Comparison of some characteristics of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera) reared by using doolittle method and natural queen cells. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 26: 113-115.
Fani Hatjina, Malgorzata, Leonidas Charistos, Robat Chleko, Cecilia Costa, Marica M Drazic, Janja Filipi, Ales Gregare, Evgeniya N Ivanova, Nikola Kezic, Jan Kopernicky and Per Kryger. 2014. A review of methods used in some European countries for assessing the quality of honey bee queens through their physical characters and the performance of their colonies. Journal of Apiculture Research, 53: 337-363.
Soller, M. and Bar-Cohen, R. 1967. Some observations on the heritability and genetic correlation between honey production and brood area in the honey bee. Journal of Apicultural Research, 6: 37-43.
Teweldemedhn and Tadese Alem. 2016. Queen rearing and colony multiplication for promoting beekeeping in Tigray, Ethopia Elixier Entomology, 92: 39257-39259.
Wheeler, D.E. 1986. Developmental and physiological determinants of caste in social Hymenoptera; evolutionary implications. The American Naturalist, 128: 13-34.