Bunch load management in relation to the training system in producing quality grapes

Authors

  • Somkuwar R G Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune (India) – 412307
  • Ausari P K Ph.D. Research Scholar, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior (MP)
  • P K S Gurjar Scientst, (Horticulture), RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh (India) - 474001
  • Thutte A S Ph.D. Research Scholar, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (India) - 413722
  • Nale R D Ph.D. Research Scholar, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (India) - 413722
  • Soni N Scientst, (Horticulture), RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh (India) - 474001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.19

Keywords:

Bunch load management, grapes, photosynthesis, training system

Abstract

Bunch load management is a critical practice in grape cultivation, deeply intertwined with both training systems and the photosynthesis process. This abstract examines the intricate relationship between bunch load management, training systems, photosynthesis, and their impacts on berry and wine quality. Effective management of bunch load involves strategically regulating the number and distribution of grape clusters on the vine. This practice is closely linked to the chosen training system, influencing factors like canopy architecture, sunlight exposure and resource allocation. The photosynthesis process in grapevines plays a pivotal role in determining the quality attributes of both berries and resulting wines. Bunch load management directly affects photosynthesis by influencing factors such as leaf-to-fruit ratio, canopy density, and light penetration. These factors collectively impact sugar accumulation, color development, and overall grapevine health, subsequently shaping the sensory and chemical qualities of the produced berries and wines. The interplay between bunch load management, training systems, and photosynthesis is therefore integral to achieving desired berry and wine quality. A well-balanced approach to bunch load management, tailored to specific training systems, enhances photosynthetic efficiency, leading to optimal sugar production and flavor development in grapes. Consequently, the resulting wines showcase enhanced aromas, flavors, and overall character. This abstract underscore the significance of understanding and implementing effective bunch load management strategies within various training systems to produce grapes with superior qualities, ultimately contributing to the production of high-quality wines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Dujaili, J.A.H. 1989. The effects of girdling and Ethephon treatments on ripening, yield quality and fruit characteristics of buhurzy grape cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.). Annals of Agricultural Science, 34 : 675-687.

Ali, M.A.; El-mogy, M.M. and Rizk, I. 2000. Effect of cane length on bud behavior, bunch characteristics, wood ripening and chemical contents of Thompson Seedless grapevine, Agricultural Science, Mansoura Univ., 25(3) : 1707-1717.

Bavougian, C.M.; Read, P.E. and Walter-Shea, E. 2012. Training System Effects on Sunlight Penetration, Canopy Structure, Yield, and Fruit Characteristics of ‘Frontenac’ Grapevine (Vitis spp.). International Journal of Fruit Science, 12 : 402-409.

Cheema, S.S.; Singh, P. and Dhillon, W.S. 2003. Effects of crop regulation and canopy management on fruit quality and disease incidence in grape. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 60 : 208-213.

Dami, I.E.; Ferree, D.C.; Kurtural, S.K. and Taylor, B.H. 2005. Influence of crop load on ‘Chambourcin’ yield, fruit quality, and winter hardiness under Midwestern United States environmental conditions, Acta Horticulture, 689 : 203- 208.

Diago, M.P.; Vilanova, M. and Tardaguila, J. 2010. Effects of timing of manual and mechanical early defoliation on the aroma of Vitis vinifera L. Tempranillo wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 61(3) : 382-391.

Dobrei, A.; Dobrei, A.; Posta, G.; Danci, M.; Nistor, E.; Camen, D.; Malaescu, M. and Sala, F. 2016. Research concerning the correlation between crop load, leaf area and grape yield in few grapevine varieties. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 10 : 222-232.

Favero, A.C.; Amorim, D.A.D.; Mota, R.V.D.; Souza, C.R.D. and Regina, M.D.A. 2010. Physiological responses and production of 'Syrah' vines as a function of training systems. Science journal on Agriculture. (Piracicaba, Braz.), 67(3) : 267-273.

Fawzi, M.I.F.; Shahin, M.F.M. and Kandil, E.A. 2010. Effect of bud load on bud behavior, yield, cluster characteristics and some biochemical contents of the cane of Crimson Seedless grapevines. Journal of American Science, 6(12):187-194.

Gamero, E.; Moreno, D.; Vilanova, M.; Uriate, D.; Prieto, M.H. and Valdes, M.E. 2014. Effect of bunch thinning and water stress on chemical and sensory characteristics of Tempranillo wines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 20 : 394-400.

Gao, Y. and Cahoon, G.A. 1994. Fruit quality, fruit skin color, and anthocyanin content and composition in Reliance (Vitis hybrid). Vitis, 33(4) : 205.

Intrieri, C. 1987. Experiences on the effect of vine spacing and trellis training system on canopy microclimate, vine performance and grape quality. Acta Horticulture, 206 : 69-87.

Kliewer, W.M. 1981. Grapevine physiology; how does grapevine make sugar leaflet No. 21231. Cooperative Extension Us Department of Agric, California Univ.

Kyraleou, M.; Kallithraka, S.; Koundouras, S.; Chira, K.; Haroutounian, S.; Spinthiropoulou, H. and Kotseridis, Y. 2015. Effect of vine training system on the phenolic composition of red grapes (Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Xinomavro). Journal International Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 49 : 71-84.

Liu, M.Y.; Chi, M.; Tang, Y.H.; Song, C.-Z.; Zhu-Mei, X. and Zhang, Z.W. 2015. Effect of three training systems on grapes in a wet region of China: Yield, incidence of disease and anthocyanin compositions of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Molecules, 20 : 18967-18987.

Mota, R.V.; De Souza., C.R.; Carvalho Silva, C.P.; Freitas, G.D.F.; Shiga, T.M.E.; Purgatto, E.P.; Lajolo, F.M. and Regina, M.D.A. 2010. Biochemical and agronomical responses of grapevines to alteration of source-sink ratio by cluster thinning and shoot trimming. Bragantia Campinas, 69(1) : 17-25.

Naor, A. and Gal, Y. 2002. Shoot and cluster thinning influence vegetative growth, fruit yield, and wine quality of ‘Sauvignon blanc’ grapevines. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 127(4) : 628-634.

Omar, A.H. and Abdel-kawi, A. 2000. Optimal bud load for Thompson seedless grapevines. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Mansoura Univ. 25(9): 5769-5777.

Palliotti, A. (2012). A new closing Y-shaped training system for grapevines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 18: 57-63.

Porika, H.; Jagadeesha, M. and Suchithra, M. (2015). Effect of pruning severity on quality of grapes cv. Red Globe for summer season. Advances in Crop Science and Technology, S1:004.

Reeve, A.L.; Skinkis, P.A.; Vance, A.J.; McLaughlin, K.R.; Tomasino, E.; Lee, J. and Tarara, J.M. 2018. Vineyard floor management and cluster thinning inconsistently affect ‘Pinot noir’ crop load, berry composition, and wine quality. Hortscience, 53(3) : 318-328.

Reynolds, A.G. and Heuvel, J.E.V. 2009. Influence of grapevine training systems on vine growth and fruit composition: A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 60 : 251-268.

Reynolds, A.G.; Price, S.F.; Wardle, D.A. and Watson, B.T. 1994. Fruit Environment and crop level effects on Pinot Noir, vine performance and fruit composition in British Columbia. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 45 : 452-459.

Reynolds, A.G.; Wardle, D.A. and Naylor, A.P. 1996a. Impact of training system, vine spacing, and basal leaf removal on Riesling. Vine performance, berry composition, canopy microclimate, and vineyard labor requirements. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 47 : 63-76.

Reynolds, A.G.; Wardle, D.A.; Cliff, M.A. and King, M. 2004a. Impact of training system and vine spacing on vine performance, berry composition, and wine sensory attributes of Seyval and Chancellor. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55 : 84-95.

Sanchez-Rodriguez, I.A. and Sposito, M.B. 2019. Influence of the trellis/training system on the physiology and production of Vitis labrusca cv. Niagara Rosada in Brazil. Scientia Horticulturae, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scientia.2019.109043

Scheiner, J.; Anciso, J. and Westover, F. 2020. Impact of training system on ‘Blanc Du Bois’ vegetative growth, yield components and fruit composition. Viticulture Data Journal, 2 : e53118.

Simonetti, L.M.; Sousa, M.C.; Moura, M.F.; Nunes, J.G.S.; Diamante, M.S.; Silva, M.B.; Silva, M.J.R.; Callili, D.; Lima, G.P.P. and Tecchio, M.A. 2021. The influence of different training systems and rootstocks on ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ grapes. Bragantia, 80

Somkuwar, R.G. and Ramteke, S.D. 2006. Yield and quality in relation to different crop loads on Tas-A-Ganesh table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Journal of Plant Sciences, 1 : 176-181.

Somkuwar, R. G.; Naik, S.; Sharma, A.K.; Bhange, M.A. and Sharma, S. 2020. Bunch load changes berry quality, yield and raisin recovery in Thompson Seedless grapes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(04): 1383-1389.

Somkuwar, R.G.; Ramteke, S.D.; Sawant, S.D. and Takawale, P. 2019. Canopy modification influences growth, yield, quality, and powdery mildew incidence in Tas-A-Ganesh grapevine. International Journal of Fruit Science, 194 : 437-451.

Somkuwar, R.G.; Samarth, R.R.; Itroutwar, P. and Navale, P. 2014. Effect of cluster thinning on bunch yield, berry quality and biochemical changes in local clone of table grape cv. Jumbo Seedless (Nana Purple). Indian Journal of Horticulture, 71(2) : 184-189.

Somkuwar, R.G.; Satisha, J.; Bondge, D.D. and Itroutwar, P. 2013. Effect of bunch load on yield, quality and biochemical changes in Sharad Seedless Grapes grafted on Dogridge rootstock. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences, 2(6) : 1226-1236.

Stavrakaki, M.; Doudoumi, T.; Daskalakis, I.; Bouza, D. and Biniari, K. 2023. Effect of different viticultural techniques on the qualitative and quantitative characters of cv. Xinomavro under vineyard conditions in Naoussa. Bio Web Conference, 43, 01023. 43rd World Congress of Vine and Wine.

Vanden Heuvel, J.E.; Proctor, J.T.A.; Sullivan, J.A. and Fisher, K.H. 2004b. Influence of training/trellising system and rootstock selection on productivity and fruit composition of Chardonnay and Cabernet franc grapevines in Ontario, Canada. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55 : 253-264.

Wang, Y.; He, Y.N.; Chen, W.K.; He, F.; Chen, W.; Cai, X.D.; Duan, C.Q. and Wang, J. 2018. Effects of cluster thinning on vine photosynthesis, berry ripeness and flavonoid composition of Cabernet Sauvignon. Food Chemistry, 248 : 101-110.

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

R G , .S., P K, .A., Gurjar, .P.K.S., A S, T., R D, N., & N, S. (2024). Bunch load management in relation to the training system in producing quality grapes. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(2), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.19