PRESENCE OF GLASS CEILING IN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: A ROADBLOCK FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/iitmjbs.2024.SI.11Keywords:
Gender inequity, Women’s leadership, Glass ceiling, UnderrepresentationAbstract
The glass ceiling in higher educational institutions is a significant roadblock to sustainable development. Despite the increasing number of women in faculty positions, their career progression appears to be slow, with many remaining concentrated toward entry-level positions. This invisible barrier hinders women’s advancement to top positions, such as heads, deans, and directors. A study of 98 faculty members working in higher education sector in NCR region revealed that gender and psychological constraints were the strongest glass ceiling barriers. Other factors like perceived discrimination and a male dominating culture significantly determine the glass ceiling effect. The conceptual model of the glass ceiling and career development in the study highlights the complexities that hinder women’s career advancement. It offers a framework for thoroughly analyzing and addressing these issues, considering the interplay of societal, organizational, human, and external factors, as well as the importance of intersectionality and continuous adaptability. The study points out that this vertical segregation not only impedes individual career development but also undermines the broader goal of gender equality, a key aspect of sustainable development.
References
1. ADamson, H. C. (2012). A quantitative study of glass ceiling barriers to promotion of women in medium-sized business. United States: ProQuest LLC.
2. Afza, S. R., & Newaz, M. K. (2008). Factors determining the presence of glass ceiling and influencing women career advancement in Bangladesh. BRAC University Journal, 5(1), 85-92.
3. All India Survey on Higher Education (2018- 19). Report by Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India.
4. April, K., & Sikatali, N. (2019). Personal and interpersonal assertiveness of female leaders in skilled technical roles. Effective Executive, 22(4), 33–58.
5. Bain, O., & Cummings, W. (2000). Academe’s glass ceiling: Societal, professional organizational, and institutional barriers to the career advancement of academic women. Comparative Education Review, 44(4), 493-514.
6. Bell, M. P., McLaughlin, M. E., & Sequeira, J. M. (2002). Discrimination, harassment, and the glass ceiling: Women executives as change agents. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 65-76.
7. Business Bliss Consultants FZE. (2018). Literature Review on the Glass Ceiling and Gender Gap in Leadership. Retrieved from https://ukdiss.com/litreview/literature-review
glass-ceiling.php?vref=1
8. Cohen, J.R., Dalton, D.W., Holder-Webb, L.L., & McMillan, J.J. (2018). An analysis of glass ceiling perceptions in the accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-
4054-4
9. Esterberg, K. (2002) Qualitative Methods in Social Research. McGraw Hill, Boston. 10. IBEF. (2023, April 23). Indian Economy. IBEF India brand equity foundation. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/news/ecb-approvals-to go-up-to-us-40-bn-in-fy19.
11. Leedy, P., & Ormrod, J. (2005). Practical Research: Planning and design. Pearson, NJ:Pearson Education.
12. Linehan, M., & Scullion, H. (2001). European female expatriate careers: Critical success factors. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(8), 392-418.
13. Maheshwari, M. & Lenka, U. (2022). An integrated conceptual framework of the glass ceiling effect. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9. 10.1108/JOEPP-06-2020-0098.
14. Welman, C., Kruger, F., & Mitchell, B. (2005). Research Methodology (3rd edn.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
