Status of Pig Rearing Practices in the Urban Districts of Uttarakhand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2024.40.2.6Keywords:
pig rearing practices, urban, Uttarakhand, socio-economic statusAbstract
Uttarakhand, a mountainous state located on the southern slope of the Himalayas, relies heavily on animal husbandry for its economy. However, the piggery sector in the state is unorganized and insufficient to meet the growing demand for pork. Moreover, the increasing urbanization and deforestation in the planar districts have blurred the boundaries between wildlife, livestock and human habitats. This study through a household survey approach aims to determine the socio-economic characteristics of the pig rearing community, the pig husbandry practices they adopt and also assess the ecological impacts of pig farming in urban districts of Uttarakhand. 28 households were surveyed and analysis of the result shows dismal socio-economic condition of the pig rearing community. Furthermore, 28.6% maintained breeding boar of feral origin and 96.94% followed semi-intensive pig rearing practices; hence human settlements have stayed in close association with pigs (domestic and wild) and other domestic animals. The possibility of the emergence of zoonotic disease and its easy transmission to humans has become more prominent in the urban setting. The findings of this study provide a preliminary picture of the current status of pig husbandry practices and challenges faced by piggery sector and government can take into account these crucial insights for a holistic piggery development program in the state.
References
Census, Primary Census Abstracts. (2011). Registrar General of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Available at: http://www.censusindia.gov
Daszak P., Cunningham A.A., Hyatt A.D. (2001). Anthropogenic environmental change and the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife. Acta Trop.; 7 8: 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-706x(00)00179-0
Dornadula C., Geomythology of India. (2007). Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 273. 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.273.01.03
FAO (2011). Surveying and monitoring of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, Number 7. Rome.
FAO (2001). Livestock keeping in urban areas. A review of traditional technologies based on literature and field experience, Chapter 3 https://www.fao.org/3/Y0500E/y0500e00.htm#t
oc
Ganguly, S. (2018). Socio-spatial stigma and segregation: A Balmiki colony in Central Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 53(50), 50–57.
Hassell, J.M., Begon, M., Ward, M.J., Fèvre, E.M.(2017). Urbanization and Disease Emergence: Dynamics at the Wildlife-Livestock Human Interface. Trends in ecology & evolution, 32(1):55-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.012
ILRI (2011). Development and application of decision support tools to conserve and sustainably use genetic diversity in indigenous livestock and wild relatives’ baseline survey: PRA tools. FAnGR Asia Project Publication 1. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/17252
Livestock Census (2017-2019) BAHS-Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics: Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. Available online from http://dahd.nic.in/about
us/divisions/statistics
Namusisi, S., Mahero, M., Travis, D., Pelican, K., Robertson, C., & Mugisha, L. (2021). A descriptive study of zoonotic disease risk at the
human-wildlife interface in a biodiversity hot spot in South Western Uganda. PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 15(1), e0008633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008633
Riedel, S., Schiborra, A., Huelsebusch, C. et al. (2012). Opportunities and challenges for smallholder pig production systems in a mountainous region of Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China. Trop Anim Health Prod 44, 1971–1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-
-0166-5
Sankaran, S., Sekerdej, M., von Hecker, U.(2017).The Role of Indian Caste Identity and Caste Inconsistent Norms on Status Representation, Frontiers in Psychology 8:487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00487.
SAP, 12th Five Year Plan 2017-2019. State Agricultural Plan Uttarakhand. https://www.rkvy.nic.in/static/SAP/UK/XI%20Pla n/SAP%202017.pdf pp12-13, pp 66-67
Saggurti, N., Saritha, N., Roy, T.K.(2005). A socio demographic analysis of the size and structure of the family in India, Journal of Comparative
Family Studies, 36(4): 623–651. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.36.4.623
Sati, V.P. (2013). Trends of Urbanization and its implications on Environment and Economy in the Uttarakhand Himalaya: A Case Study of Dehradun Municipal Corporation, ENVIS Bulletin on Himalayan Ecology. 21. 9-14.
Sethi, B., Butola, K. S., Arora, B., Kumar, Y., and Suri, V. (2010). Human trichinosis in remotes of Uttarakhand, India. Indian journal of medical sciences, 64(3), 104–110.
Taylor, L. H., Latham, S. M., and Woolhouse, M. E. (2001). Risk factors for human disease emergence. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 356(1411), 983–989. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0888
Wu, N., Abril, C., Thomann, A, et. al. (2012). Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spillover. BMC Veterinary Research, 8, 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-116.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
