Effect of different bedding materials on  the performance of rats

K H Balaji; Rajeshwari  Y B; Basavaraj; Vivek  M P

doi:10.48165/jlas.2019.2.2.5

Authors

K H Balaji Department of Livestock production and Management, Veterinary college, Hebbal, Bangalore –560024, Karnataka, India Author
Rajeshwari Y B Professor and Head, Department of Live stock production and Management, Veterinary college, Hebbal, Bangalore 560 024, Karnataka Author
Basavaraj Department of Livestock production and Management, Veterinary college, Hebbal, Bangalore –560024, Karnataka, India Author
Vivek M P Department of Livestock production and Management, Veterinary college, Hebbal, Bangalore –560024, Karnataka, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jlas.2019.2.2.5

Keywords:

Rat, Litter weight, Litter size, Paddy husk, Corncob, Wood shavings

Abstract

Bedding and nesting material provided in cages for laboratory rats has important consequences on welfare, directly through the comfort and utility in behaviour such as nest building, and indirectly through properties such as air quality. A study was conducted at Small Animal House, Veterinary College, Bangalore to find out effect of different bedding materials on the reproductive performance of laboratory rats. Thirty Wistar female rats were divided into three groups and subjected to the different bedding material used – paddy husk (PH), corncob (CC) and wood shavings (WS). Litter size and litter weight were recorded at birth and at weaning (day 21). Bedding material significantly (P<0.05) influenced litter size at birth, where it was significantly higher in WS (8.06±0.31) and PH (8.03±0.31) than in CC (6.8±0.3). Litter weight was higher in WS at all times, though not significantly (P>0.05) different from the other groups. The results indicate that wood shavings and corncob may be suitably used as alternative to other bedding materials for laboratory rats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boyd J(1988). Mice: Humane innovation and alternatives in animal experimentation. Lab. Anim., 3: 98-99.

Burkhart CA and Robinson JL(1978). High rat pup mortality attributed to the use of cedar-wood shavings as bedding.Lab. Anim., 12: 221-222.

Krohn TC,Dragsted N and Hansen AK (2006).The use of IVC-systems for housing mice and rats.Proceedings of the Ninth FELASA Symposium in Nantes, France, London.Lab. Anim., 109-113.

Krohn TC, Dragsted N and Hansen AK (2008).Evaluation of Corncob as Bedding for Rodents.Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci., 35(4): 231-236.

Mulder JB (1975). Bedding preference of pregnant laboratory reared mice. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 7: 21–22.

Norris ML and Adams CE (1976).Incidence of pup mortality in the rat with particular reference to nesting material, maternal age and parity.Lab. Anim.10: 165–169.

Potgieter FJ and Wilke PI(1996). The dust content, dust generation, ammonia production, and absorption properties of three different rodent bedding types. Lab. Anim., 30: 79-87.

Potgieter FJ and Wilke PI (1997).Effect of different bedding materials on the reproductive performance of mice.J. South Afr. Vet. Asso.68(1): 8-15.