Survey of health monitoring programmes from laboratory animal facilities in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jlas.2019.2.2.3Keywords:
Health monitoring survey, sentinel program, rodent diseases, diagnostic methods, sanitation practicesAbstract
Health monitoring in laboratory animals provides health status of the colony and helps in providing clean animals which plays a pivotal role in the outcome of the experimental results. The assessment of microbial status of the laboratory animals is considered as part of the animal care program. The primary objectives of the survey included were as follows: a) To understand the health status of the animals and health monitoring programs in India, b) To create a platform to share the ideas and practices followed among the laboratory animal care professionals, c) To provide solution to uplift the standards of these programs. The institutions that participated in this program were approved by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision on Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) and some of them certified by Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) of the National GLP Compliance Monitoring Authority of Dept.of Science and Technology, Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC) and National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL). The response from each institution was obtained unanimously and the compiled results were maintained confidentially prior to disclosure in an appropriate forum. The responses showed that most of the institutions were following health monitoring programs and are required to harmonize testing methods and frequency based on the duration of experiments as well as the integrity of the facility.
Downloads
References
Baker DG (1988). Natural pathogens of laboratory mice, rats and rabbits and their effects on research. Clin.Microbiol.Rev. 11:231-266.
Bhatt PN, Jacoby RO, Barthold SW (1986). Contamination of transplantable murine tumors with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Lab.Anim.Sci. 36(2):136-139.
Berard M, Medaille C, Simon M, Serre S, Pritchett-corning K, Dangles marie V (2009). Ralstonia pickettii induced ataxia in immunodeficient mice. Comp Med. 59. 187-191.
Casebolt DB, Lindsey JR, Cassell GH (1988). Prevalence rates of infectious agents among commercial breeding populations of rats and mice. Lab. Anim.Sci. 38, 327-329
CDC, Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infections in Employees of a Rodent Breeding Facility - Indiana, May-June 2012/ 61(32); 622- 623 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6132a5.htm
Chandy S, Abraham P, Sridharan G (2008). Hantaviruses: an emerging public health threat in India? A review. J. Biosci. 33: 495-504.
Dammann P, Hilken G, Hueber B, Kohl W, Bappert MT, Mahler M (2011). Infectious microorganisms in mice (Mus musculus) purchased from commercial pet shops in Germany. Lab. Anim. 45: 271-275.
Devan S, Parthiban N, Narayanan S, Poosala S (2011). Sentinel monitoring program: Quality assurance in laboratory animal facility. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. Vol 1 (1); 68-76.
Easterbrook JD, Kaplan JB, Glass GE, Watson J, Klein SL (2007). A survey of rodent-borne pathogens carried by wild-caught Norway rats: a potential threat to laboratory rodent colonies. Lab Anim. (2008). 42 (1): 92-98.
Gaertner DJ (2004). Speculations on why some lab rodent pathogens continue to be prevalent. Contemporary Topics. 43 (3): 8.
Gannon J, Carthew P (1980). Prevalence of indigenous viruses in laboratory animal colonies in the United Kingdom 1978-1979. Lab. Anim. 14: 309-311.
Hayashimoto N, Morita H, Ishida T et. al (2013). Current microbiological status of laboratory mice and rats in experimental facilities in Japan. Exp. Anim. 62: 41-48.
Harikrishnan VS, Ranaraj VR, Sreeja KR, Fernandez AC (2011). Eradication of
Pinworms (Syphacia Spp) in rodent colony, J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 1 (1): 64-67.
Ingle Arvind D, Shinde Arjun (2014). Microbiological assessment of laboratory rodents:Perspectives from laboratory animal facility of ACTREC, J. Lab. Anim. Sci. March 2014, Vol 2, 1: 1-9.
Ingle Arvind, Shinde Arjun (2011). Control of Ectoparasites and Nematodes (Pinworms) from Laboratory Bred Mice at Laboratory Animal Facility, ACTREC, J. Vet.Parasitol. 2011, 25, 2:155-158.
http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:jvp&volume=25 &issue=2&article=015
Jacoby RO, Lindsey JR (1998). Risks of infection among laboratory rats and mice at major biomedical research institutions. ILAR. 39 (4): 266-271.
Kariwa H, Lokugamage K, Lokugamage N et. al (2007). A comparative epidemiological study of hanta virus infection in Japan and Far East Russia. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 54: 145-161.
Knust B, Holman RC, Redd J et al (2013). Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infections among American Indians. Emerg Infect Dis. 19 (2): 328-329. doi: 10.3201/eid1902.120888.
Livingston RS and Riley LK (2003). Diagnostic testing of mouse and rat colonies for infectious agents. Lab. Anim. 32 (5):44-51.
Mahler M, Kohl W (2009). A serological survey to evaluate contemporary prevalence of viral agents and Mycoplasma pulmonis in laboratory mice and rats in Western Europe. Lab. Anim. (NY) 38:161- 165.
Mahler M, Berard M, Feinstein R et. al (2014), FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Lab. Anim. 48 (3): 178-192.
McInnes EF, Rasmussen L, Fung P et. al (2011). Prevalence of viral, bacterial and parasitological diseases in rats and mice in research environments in Australasia over a 5-y period. Lab. Anim. (NY) 40(11): 341-50.
Nicklas W, Baneux P, Boot R et. al (2002). FELASA; Recommendations for the health monitoring of rodent and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units, Lab. Anim. 36: 20-42.
Nicklas W (2008). International harmonisation of health monitoring. ILAR. 49 (3): 338 - 346.
Nicklas W, Deeny A, Diercks P et. al (2010). FELASA guidelines for the accreditation of health monitoring programs and testing laboratories involved in health monitoring. Lab Anim. 39: 43-48.
Nitatpattana N, Chauvancy G, Dardaine J et. al (2000). Serological study of hantavirus in the rodent population of Nakhon Pathom and Nakhon Ratchasima provinces Thailand. SouthEast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 31: 277-282.
Nitatpattana N, Henrich T, Palabodeewat S et. al (2002). Hantaan virus antibody prevalence in rodent populations of several provinces of northeastern Thailand. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 7: 840-845.
Perdue KA, Green KY, Copeland M et. al (2007). Naturally occurring Murine Norovirus infection in a large research institution. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. 46: 39-46.
Pritchett-Corning KR, Cosentino J, Clifford CB (2009). Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats. Lab. Anim. 43: 165-173.
Rehg JE, Toth LA (1998). Rodent quarantine programs: purpose, principles and practice. Lab Anim. 48( 5): 438-447.
Roble GS, Gillespie V, Lipman NS (2012). Infectious Disease survey of Mus musculus from pet store in New York City. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. 51: 37-41.
Sparrow S (1976). The microbiological and parasitological status of laboratory animals from accredited breeders in the United Kingdom. Lab. Anim. 10: 365-371.
Weigler BJ, Di Giacomo RF, Alexander S (2005). A national survey of laboratory animal workers concerning occupational risks for zoonotic diseases. Comp Med. Vol 55 (2), 183-191.
Weisbroth S, Emily P (2000). Global harmonization of laboratory rodent health surveillance standards. Lab. Anim. Vol 29, 6.
Whary MT, Fox JG (2006). Detection, eradication, and research implications of Helicobacter infections in laboratory rodents. Lab Anim (NY). 35(7): 25-7, 30-6.
World Health Organization (1967) Joint FAO-WHO expert committee on zoonosis. Third report. World Health Organ.Tech.Rep.Ser. 378: 1-127.
Yamamoto H, Sato H, Yagami K et. al (2001). Microbiological contamination in genetically modified animals and proposals for a microbiological test standard for national universities in Japan. Exp. Anim. 50: 397-407.
Zenner L, Regnault JP (2000). Ten-year long monitoring of laboratory mouse and rat colonies in French facilities: a retrospective study. Lab. Anim. 34: 76-83.