Zebrafish breeding in laboratory environment at TIFR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jlas.2020.3.1.5Keywords:
zebrafish, breeding, spawn, embryo, larvaAbstract
Laboratory zebrafish (Danio rerio) has proved promising vertebrate animal model in modern biology research during past few decades. Several inherent biological features in zebrafish, have invited attention of the scientific community to use them in genetics and developmental biology research. Attempts were made to establish facility to raise and maintain several lines of wild type and mutant zebrafish at the Department of Biological Sciences in 2009. A small room in the department housed ~50 wildtype zebrafish obtained from the ornamental fish shop at the local market (M/s. Vikrant Aquaculture, Mumbai). At the beginning, fish were raised in glass aquarium of 50 liters capacity for 6 to 12 months. During the period of initial setup, all the members of the group associated with the usage of zebrafish,received training in the zebrafish husbandry, water quality control, fish breeding and health monitoring. The state of the art facility was established later on by setting Recirculating Water System (RWS) procured from the Aquatic Habitat, USA. The wild type (WT) and mutant fish lines procured from the Max Plank Institute (MPI), Germany,were kept in RWS after ensuring healthy aquatic environment for the fish. The standard operating protocols for fish husbandry, breeding, nutrition, water and health quality of zebrafish were formulated.The breeding parameters such as fecundity, egg spawning, viability and mortality were studied. The female fecundity percentage noticed between 42 to 58 and the mean egg spawn found between 139.77 to 242.42 eggs per female in five strains. In-vitro culture of embryos revealed maximum mortality on first day of culture with decreased mortality on subsequent days. Mortality percentage observed during the period of culture ranged between 14.35 to 30.21 in five strains with mean mortality of 21.34%. The embryo viability in five strains ranged between 69.78% to 85.64% with mean viability of 78.65%. In the present study, attempts have been made to generate basic data associated with breeding of the laboratory zebrafish.
Downloads
References
Andrzej N, Matthew DC (2012). Zebrafish Breeding in the Laboratory Environment.ILAR. 45:161-168.
Breder CM, Rosen DE (1966).Modes of reproduction in fishes.American Museum of Natural History. Garden City (NY): Natural History Press.
David White (2005). Zebrafish Facility,S.O.P.Washington University, unpublished work.
Eaton RC, Farley RD (1974). Growth and reduction of dispensation of the zebrafish, Brachy danio rerio, reared in the laboratory. Copeia 1:204-209.
Grunwald DJ, Eisen JS (2002). Headwaters of the zebrafish - Emergence of a new model vertebrate.Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:717-724.
Mrakovcic M, Haley LE (1978). Genetic effect of inbreeding in warm water fish Brachy danio rerio.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 20:450-450.
Mrakovcic M, Haley LE (1979). Inbreeding depression in the zebra fish Brachy danio rerio (Hamilton Buchanan).J. Fish. Biol. 15:323-327.
Markovich ML, Rizzuto NV, Brown PB (2007). Diet affects spawning in zebrafish.Zebrafish. 4:69-74.
Meinelt T, Schulz C, Wirth M, Kurzinger H, Steinberg C (1999). Dietary fatty acid composition influences the fertilization rate of zebrafish (Danio rerio, Hamilton Buchanan). J. Appl.Ichthyol. 15:19-23.
Michael B, Christiane N, Ralf D (2002). Keeping and raising zebrafish. Zebrafish: A Practical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spence R, Ashton R, Smith C (2007). Oviposition decisions are mediated by spawning site quality in wild and domesticated zebrafish, Danio rerio. Behaviour.144:953-966.
Uusi-Heikkila S, Wolter C, Meinelt T, Arlinghaus R (2010). Size-dependent reproductive success of wild zebrafish, Danio rerio in the laboratory. J. Fish. Biol. 77:552-569.
Westerfield M(1993). The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (BrachyDanio rerio). Eugene: University of Oregon Press.