Cost-Effective Decontamination of Conventional Laboratory Animal Rooms Using Hydrogen Peroxide Aerosols
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jlas.2023.6.2.5Keywords:
laboratory animals, Efficiency ParticulateAbstract
Conventional animal facilities lack HVAC systems with HEPA filters and therefore pose great hurdles in maintaining the pathogen-free status of macro-environment of the animal rooms. Even in places where HVAC has no HEPA filters, maintaining clean air in the animal room is a challenge. Production of healthy animals for biomedical research is a key objective of any laboratory animal facility. There are several factors which can contribute to achieve this goal, and macro
enviornment is one of them. Decontamination of animal rooms eliminates the pathogens from the room. Chemical liquids and vapours are mainly used as decontaminating agents. Vaporised Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) technology is being widely used for this purpose. For VHP technology, motorised equimpents are required which are very expensive. Small animal facilities can not afford to buy expensive VHP equipments. Therefore, the present study was planned to find out cost effective alternative for expensive equipments. Fine mist of working solution Huwa-San- TR50 was sprayed over the walls using a domestic Vacuum Cleaner. Effectnivness of decontamination procedure was conducted by microbiological examination of air and surface monitoring with swab methods after 15 mins. of contact time. Our results suggested that after decontamination, there was significant reduction in microbiological load from animal rooms. Hence, alternatively, facilities with tight annual budget can use this technique to limit the microbiological load in animal facilities in cost effective manner.
Downloads
References
1. Devan SR, Vasu S, Mallikarjuna Y, Ponraj R, Kamath G, Poosala S. (2018). Improvement of Vivarium Biodecontamination through Data-acquisition Systems and Automation. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 1; 57(2): 161-
172.
2. Swenberg James A., Moeller Benjamin C., Lu Kun, Rager Julia E., Fry Rebecca, and Starr Thomas B. (2013). Formaldehyde Carcinogenicity Research: 30 Years and Counting for Mode of Action, Epidemiology, and Cancer Risk Assessment, Toxicol Pathol, 41(2): 181-189.
3. Fichet, G., E. Comoy, C. Duval, K. Antloga, C. Dehen, A. Charbonnier, G.McDonnell, P. Brown, C. I. Lamezas, and J. P. Deslys. (2004). Novel methods for disinfection of prion-contaminated medical devices. Lancet, 364: 521-
526.
4. Quilez, J., C. Sanchez-Acedo, C. Avendano, E. del Cacho, and F. Lopez-Bernad. (2005). Efficacy of two peroxygen based disinfectants for inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 71: 2479–2483
5. Ingraham Amy, and Fleischer Tammy Marotta. (2003). Disinfectants in Laboratory Animal Science: What Are They and Who Says They Work? Lab Animal, 32, 1: 36- 40.
6. Otter JA, Yezli S, French GL. (2011). The role played by contaminated surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 32(7): 687-99.)
7. Meszaros JE, Antloga K, Justi C, Plesnicher C, McDonnell G. (2005). Area fumigation with hydrogen peroxide vapor. Appl Biosafety, 10: 91-100.
8. Krause, J., McDonnell, G., & Riedesel, H. (2001). Biodecontamination of animal rooms and heat sensitive equipment with vaporized hydrogen peroxide. Contemporary Topics, American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 40(6): 18-21.
9. McDonnell, G., & Russell, A. D. (1999). Antiseptics and disinfectants: Activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 12: 147-179
10. Linley E, Denyer SP, McDonnell G, Simons C, Maillard JY. (2012). Use of hydrogen peroxide as a biocide: new consideration of its mechanisms of biocidal action. J Antimicrob Chemother, 67:1589-1596.
11. Fichet G, Comoy E, Duval C, Antloga K, Dehen A, Charbonnier A, McDonnell G, Brown P, Lamezas CI, Deslys JP. (2004). Novel methods for disinfection of prion contaminated medical devices. Lancet, 364: 521-526.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
