Ensuring Excellence and Quality Accreditation in Medico Legal Practices

Authors

  • Mukul Sharma Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Raebareli, UP
  • Yogendra Velicharla Senior Resident, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Raebareli, UP
  • Utsav Parekh Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Rajkot, Gujarat
  • Sanjay Gupta Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Rajkot, Gujarat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2026.43.01.13

Keywords:

Medico-legal; Quality; Accreditation; Autopsy; Standardization; Certification.

Abstract

The medico-legal system forms a critical interface between medicine and law, pivotal for the administration of justice. Its  integrity, however, is frequently compromised by the absence of standardized protocols and a formal accreditation frame work. The integration of robust quality accreditation systems, drawing parallels from established healthcare standards like  the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare Providers (NABH) and the National Accreditation Board  for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL), is essential to address this deficiency. These standards can also be  applicable to certain aspects in the field of forensic – State Forensic Labs and Forensic Histopathology labs. Maintaining  healthcare standards and following protocols also reduces the medicolegal burden of hospitals. A structured quality  management system is imperative for ensuring precision, accountability, and integrity in all medico-legal procedures.  This is particularly crucial for post-mortem examinations, where the implementation of Standard Operating Procedures  (SOPs) for autopsy performance, dead body management, chain of custody for sample preservation, and compliant biomedical waste management prevents evidentiary contamination and procedural lapses. Also following a standard report ing format can make sure the quality of reporting is not compromised. Adopting a formal accreditation process would  minimize errors, enhance the scientific validity of forensic findings, and ensure uniformity across different centres. A  quality-accredited medico-legal framework is fundamental to upholding the principles of justice, ensuring defensibility  in court, and strengthening public confidence in both the medical and legal systems. 

 

References

National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. (2024). NABL accreditation guidelines. New Delhi: NABL. Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://www.nabl-india.org/nabl/file_download.php

National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. (2023). NABL medical laboratory accreditation (5th ed.). New Delhi: NABL.

National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers. (2023). NABH standards for small healthcare organizations (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Quality Council of India.

Joint Commission International. (2023). JCI accreditation standards for hospitals (7th ed.). Oak Brook: JCI.

National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers. (2025). NABH hospital accreditation standards (6th ed.). New Delhi: Quality Council of India. Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://portal.nabh.co/images/Standards/NABH%20Hospital%20Accreditation%20Standard%206th%20Edition%20January%202025.pdf

BuiltX. (2025, January 11). NABH accreditation process: 2025 deep-dive guide to the 6th edition for hospitals. BuiltX Blog. Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://www.builtxsdc.com/blog/nabh-accreditation-process-2025

India Briefing. (2025, January 8). Incorporating a healthcare business in India: NABH standards, FDI, and compliance. India Briefing. Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://www.india-briefing.com/news/healthcare-business-incorporation-in-india-nabh-regulatory-overview-2025-39684.html

Joint Commission International. (2024). JCI implementation guidelines for India. Oak Brook: JCI.

International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 15189:2022 medical laboratories—Requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO.

International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO 9001:2015 quality management systems—Requirements. Geneva: ISO.

Quality Council of India. (2024). Guidelines for implementation of accreditation standards in medico-legal practice. New Delhi: QCI.

Mehta, V., & Goel, A. (2024). Strengthening quality assurance in Indian hospitals: NABH, NABL, and JCI perspectives. Indian Journal of Healthcare Quality, 29(3), 191–198.

Singh, R. K., Sharma, B., & Prasad, S. (2025). Medicolegal documentation and data management: NABH and DPDP compliance for 2025. Medico-Legal Update, 25(1), 45–52.

Raman, S., & Kumar, N. (2024). Achieving excellence in medico-legal investigations: The role of NABL and ISO 15189 standards. Journal of Forensic Medicine and Law, 16(2), 109–115.

Ghosh, S., & Saha, P. (2025). Recent developments in Indian quality accreditation—Impact on medical and medico-legal services. Quality in Healthcare, 17(1), 12–20.

Published

2026-04-15

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

Ensuring Excellence and Quality Accreditation in Medico Legal Practices. (2026). Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 43(1), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2026.43.01.13