Fingerprint Pattern Similarities Among Family Members: A Forensic Study of Hereditary Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2026.43.01.07Keywords:
forensic science, Forensic medicine, fingerprint pattern, family fingerprint, inheritance of fingerprintAbstract
Fingerprints are a vital tool for identifying criminals and disaster victims. While DNA testing is effective, it is expensive and often a resource constraint for agencies like DVI. A more affordable solution is a fingerprint recognition system integrated with population data. Interestingly, 46.4% of children share the same fingerprint pattern as their parents. This similarity allows for the identification of underage victims or those without biometric data by matching their fingerprints with living relatives. This research aims to analyze inherited fingerprint patterns within families. Fingerprint are obtained from 36 subject of 2 big families comprising of a group of three levels of descent. The data obtained were analyzed by elaborating the data in the form of tables and statistic test. There is a high prevalence of the Ulnar Loop fingerprint pat tern in Family A (75.33%) and Family B (78.57%). In Family A, Ulnar Loop was found on the middle finger of the right hand (100%), and the middle finger of the left hand (93.33%). In Family B, grandparents with 100% Ulnar Loop patterns passed this trait to all their children except for one with 90%. A significant relationship between family members and fingerprint pattern similarity shows in both families (p value < 0.05). The Ulnar Loop showed a strong positive correlation (0.765***) in Family A and a strong negative correlation (-0.716**) in Family B, highlighting complex inheritance patterns. These findings strongly indicate a significant familial influence on fingerprint patterns, particularly the Ulnar Loop, affirming the potential for developing family-based fingerprint-matching technologies.
References
Aigbogun, J. E. O., Ibeachu, C. P., & Lemuel, A. M. (2019). Fingerprint pattern similarity: A family-based study using novel classification. Anatomy, 13(2), 107–115.
Patil, V., & Ingle, D. R. (2021). An association between fingerprint patterns with blood group and lifestyle-based diseases: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(3), 1803–1839.
Alketbi, S. K., & Saif, A. (2022). Dual recovery of DNA and fingerprints using minitapes. Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation, 16(1), 1–4.
Kausar, S., Khanzada, R., & Sherazi, M. A. (2024). Comparative study of forensic face recognition and fingerprint during crime scene investigation and the role of artificial intelligence tools in forensics. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5(1).
Petrovic, N., Stojicic, S., Radovanovic, R., Stojicic, M., & Petrovic, M. (2024). Determining the identity of corpses using fingerprints: Results from practice and analysis of process used in the Republic of Serbia. Perspectives in Legal and Forensic Sciences, 1(1), 10003.
de Souza, M. A., Urtiaga, G. de O., Ferreira, R. C. G., da Silva, L. M., Umbelino, J. K. G., de Melo, F. R., et al. (2022). Friction ridge analysis in disaster victim identification (DVI): Brazilian case studies. Forensic Science Research, 7(2), 323–329.
Bowman, Z., Daniel, R., Gerostamoulos, D., Woodford, N., & Hartman, D. (2022). Rapid DNA from a disaster victim identification perspective: Is it a game changer? Forensic Science International: Genetics, 58, 102684.
Watherston, J., Watson, J., Bruce, D., Ueland, M., McNevin, D., & Ward, J. (2022). An in-field evaluation of rapid DNA instruments for disaster victim identification. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 136(2), 493–499.
Johnson, B. T. (2024). Advances in postmortem fingerprinting: Applications in disaster victim identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 69(5), 1681–1689.
Urbano, D. (2024). Augmenting emergency response utilizing biometric for expedited information gathering by first responders. Bulacan State University.
Watherston, J., Watson, J., Bruce, D., Ward, J., & McNevin, D. (2021). Efficient DNA profiling protocols for disaster victim identification. Forensic Sciences, 1(3), 148–170.
Adamovic, N., Howes, L. M., White, R., & Julian, R. (2023). Understanding the challenges of disaster victim identification: Perspectives of Australian forensic practitioners. Forensic Science Research, 8(2), 107–115.
Mahmood Ali, M. (2022). Automated details retrieval system for victims of incidents and accidents using fingerprint. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 12(1), 1265–1275.
Hendriawan, S., Julianto, W., & Himmawan, D. (2022). Sosialisasi E-KTP dan pemilih pemula di Desa Kedokan Gabus Kabupaten Indramayu. Engagement: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 31–35.
Mundijo, T., & Purwoko, M. (2017). Dominasi pewarisan pola sidik jari whorl dalam keluarga karyawan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang. Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya, 9(4), 312–315.
Chockaian, K., Vayanaperumal, R., & Kanagaraj, B. R. (2013). New approach for identifying hereditary relation using primary fingerprint patterns. IET Image Processing, 7(5), 423–431.
Lien, C. W., & Vhaduri, S. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of biometric user authentication in the age of IoT: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(1), 1–37.
Chopra, M. (2020). The study of fingerprint patterns among male and female. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(4), 408–413.
Aziz, I., Iqbal, F., Alam, N., Yasmin, R. S., Khattak, A., Farid, N., et al. (2024). Pattern of fingerprints and its association with gender among medical students of Peshawar Medical College. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 5(6), 114–117.
Wau, A., Elviana, R., & Syamsurizal, S. (2024). Identification of Nias fingerprint patterns. Tropical Genetics, 4(1), 19–22.
Ahmed, M., Ullah, M., Aroosa, Farooq, A., Ali, Q., Abbas, A., et al. (2024). Investigating the inheritance patterns and potential associations of selected human morphogenetic traits. Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research, 2024(1), 77.
