Evaluation of biorationals and insecticides against coconut rugose spiralling whitefly (Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin)

Authors

  • S M Wankhede AICRP on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri-415 612
  • V V Shinde AICRP on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri-415 612, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli-415 712, Maharashtra, India
  • S L Ghavale AICRP on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri-415 612, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli-415 712, Maharashtra, India
  • K V Malshe AICRP on Palms, Regional Coconut Research Station, Bhatye, Ratnagiri-415 612, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli-415 712, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.01.22

Keywords:

Biological suppression, biointensive management, biorationals, coconut, eco-friendly measures, palms, invasive whiteflies, IPM, starch solution

Abstract

Palms treated with T7–Soap nut @ 1 per cent recorded minimum incidence of coconut rugose spiralling whitefly (17.2%), which was significantly superior over T10–Untreated control (34.5%) and found at par with T2- Lambda cyhalothrin + starch solution @1 per cent (20.5%), T3- Deltamethrin + starch solution @1 per cent (21.1%), T1- Imidacloprid + starch solution @1 per cent (21.9%), T8- Soap water (23.3%), T4- Buprofezin + starch solution @1 per cent (24.1%), T5- Pongamia oil + starch solution @1 per cent (26.4%), T6- Lecanicilium lecanii (26.5%) and T9- Water spray (29.1%). The minimum RSW intensity (9%) noticed in T7 was at par with rest of the treatments and found significantly superior over T10 (23%). The T7 treatment recorded minimum RSW populations (21.5 nos) followed by T2 (23.7nos) and was found significantly superior over T10 (41.6 nos). Highest Encarsia parasitism and natural enemies (predators/spiders), respectively were found in T10 (40.7% and 2.1 nos) and was par with T9 (35.6% and 1.75 nos.), T8 (32.7% and 1.48 nos.) and T7 (29.2% and 1.53 nos.). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A.D., Harlow, J.L., Avery, P.B. and Kumar, V. 2015. Investigating the role of fungal entomopathogens in whitefly landscape IPM programs. Journal of Entomological Science, 50: 254-261.

Ali, Abdulle Yusuf, Talha, Nazir, Uddin K., Azhar, Ali, Habib, Shah, Zaman, Tauqir, Anwar, Trinh, Duy Nam and Dewen, Qiu. 2020. In vitro virulence of three Lecanicillium lecanii strains against the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 30:129.

Anonymous. 2022. Coconut : State Directorate of Horticulture. Third Advance Estimates of Area and Production of Horticulture Crops 2021-22, Maharashtra.

Boopathi, T., Karuppuchamy, P., Singh, S.B., Kalyanasundaram, M., Mohankumar S. and Ravi, M. 2015. Microbial control of the invasive spiraling whitefly on cassava with entomopathogenic fungi. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 46:1077-85. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246420141067.

Kendappa, G.N., Mallikarjunappa, S., Shankar, G. and Mithyantha, M.S. 2004. Evaluation of certain insecticides against spiralling whitefly (Aleurodicus dispersus) Russell (Aleyrodidate : Homoptera) on cotton. Pestology, 28:32-33.

Martin, J.H. 2004. The whiteflies of Belize (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Part 1 - Introduction and account of the subfamily Aleurodicinae Quaintance & Baker. Zootaxa, 681, 1-119.

Morade, S.S. 2014. Bioecology and efficacy of insecticides against spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell, infesting guava in Konkan region. M.Sc. (Ag.) thesis submitted to Dr. B.S.K.K.V., Dapoli (M.S.) (Unpublished).

Pradhan, S.K., Shylesha, A.N., Selvaraj, K. and Sumalatha, B.V. 2020. Efficacy of insecticides against invasive rugose spiralling whitefly Aleurodicus rugioperculatus martin on banana. Indian Journal of Entomology, 82: 245. DoI No.: 10.5958/0974-8172.2020.00056.5.

Rahman, Syed Shayfur, Rahman, Md. Mizanur, Shameem, Ara Begum, Rahman, Khan Mohammad Mizanur and Bhuiyan, Md. Mosharef Hossain. 2007. Investigation of Sapindus Mukorossi extract for repellency, insecticidal activity and plant growth regulatory effect. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3: 95-101.

Raghavim, D., Sakthi Balaa, M., Surrender, S., Lokesh, P. and Kalidas, K. 2019. Review on area, production and productivity of coconut in India. International Journal of Research in Business Management, 7: 1-6.

Sharma, A., Sati, S. C., Sati, O.P., Sati, D. Maneesha and Kothiyal, S.K. 2011. Chemical constituents and bio activities of genus Sapindus. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy, 2: 403-409.

Singh, A.K. and Karun, Anitha. 2022. Research perspectives on coconut, arecanut and cocoa. Indian Horticulture, Nov.-Dec.: 5-11.

Sohrabi, Fariba, Shishehbor, Parviz, Saber, Moosa and Mosaddegh, Mohammad Said. 2012. Lethal and sublethal effects of buprofezin and imidacloprid on the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Crop Protection, 32: 83-89.

Suhagia, B.N., Rathod, I.S. and Sindhu, Sunil. 2011. Sapindus mukorossi (Areetha): An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2: 1905-1913.

Sundararaj, R. and Selvaraj, K. 2017. Invasion of rugose spiraling whitefly, Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae): a potential threat to coconut in India. Phytoparasitica, DOI 10.1007/s12600-017-0567-0.

Wafaa, A.A. Kherb. 2011. Field efficacy of some neonicotinoid insecticides on whitefly Bemicia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and its natural enemies in cucumber and tomato plants in Al-qassim Region, KSA. Journal of Entomology, 8: 429-439.

Wankhede, S.M., Shinde, V.V. and Ghavale, S.L. 2022. Status of rugose spiralling whitefly (Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin) in Konkan region of Maharashtra. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems, 26: 196-201.

Published

2024-01-19

How to Cite

Wankhede, S.M., Shinde, V.V., Ghavale, S.L., & Malshe, K.V. (2024). Evaluation of biorationals and insecticides against coconut rugose spiralling whitefly (Aleurodicus rugioperculatus Martin). Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(1), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.01.22