Ergonomic evaluation of uprooting of paddy seedlings in mat nursery

Authors

  • M Kalita Department of Family Resource Management and Consumer Science, College of Community Science, AAU, Jorhat-785-013, Assam, India.
  • B Bhuyan Department of Family Resource Management and Consumer Science, College of Community Science, AAU, Jorhat-785-013, Assam, India.
  • R Borah Department of Family Resource Management and Consumer Science, College of Community Science, AAU, Jorhat-785-013, Assam, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.01.13

Keywords:

Uprooting, mat nursery, physical fitness, heart rate, physiological workload, stress

Abstract

Uprooting of paddy seedlings is one of the drudgery prone farm activities. A study was carried out to assess the physiological workload and energy expenditures of farm women while uprooting from mat nursery. A stepstool technique was adopted for assessing physical fitness of the participants. Heart rate was recorded with Heart Rate Monitor and Rating of Perceived Exertion was calculated using Borg’s 5 point rating scale. The mean height was 151.07 cm and mean weight was 45.47 kg. Most of the respondents (46%) were having ‘high average’ physical fitness followed by 33 per cent in ‘below average’ category. Working heart rate values while uprooting in mat nursery (HR 86.16 b min-1) was lower as compared to uprooting in wet bed (HR 128.56 b min-1). Energy expenditure values were worked out to be 6.63 kJ min-1 and 11.86 kJ min-1 for mat nursery and wet bed, respectively. The physiological workload of uprooting in mat nursery was categorized as ‘very light’ and wet bed as ‘heavy’ on the basis of heart rate and energy expenditures. There was no significant difference in yield from seedlings of mat nursery and wet bed. Mat nursery is a suitable alternative to wet bed for reducing physiological and muscular stress, and labour cost. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borg, G. 1982. Psychological basis of physical exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 377-387.

Borah, R., Kalita, M. and Bhuyan, B. 2001. Ergonomic evaluation of drudgery prone activity – uprooting of seedlings. Proceedings of International Congress on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, held in IIT, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai. pp. 11-14.

Durnin, J. and Rahman. 1967. The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skin folds thickness. British Journal of Nutrition, 21: 681-688.

Saha, P.N. 1996. Respiratory and physical fitness scale on women, In: Ergonomics Research on Women in India. (eds. M. A. Varghese, A. Bhatnagar and P.N. Saha). SNDT Women’s University, Mumbai. p. 41.

Varghese, M.A., Saha, P.N., Bhatnagar, A. and Chauhan, M. 1994. Development of a database for occupational workload and physical fitness. Status of Indian Women. DST Project Report, Bombay.

Varghese, M.A., Saha, P.N. and Atrya, N. 1995. A rapid appraisal for occupational workload from a modified scale of perceived exertion. Ergonomics, 37: 485-491.

Published

2024-01-19

How to Cite

Kalita, M., Bhuyan, B., & Borah, R. (2024). Ergonomic evaluation of uprooting of paddy seedlings in mat nursery . Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(1), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.01.13