Comprehensive genotype x environment interaction analysis of wheat genotypes evaluated under multi locations trials in the Central Zone of the country

Authors

  • ajay verma ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001
  • bhudev singh ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001
  • gyanender singh ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.18

Keywords:

AMMI analysis, Biplot analysis, Hierarchical clustering, non parametric measures

Abstract

 

AMMI analysis showed highly significant effects of environments, genotypes x environments interactions and genotypes for the field evaluation of ten genotypes at fifteen locations of the zone. Environments effects held largest share of 76.7 per cent followed by interactions of 11.4 per cent the total sum of squares. ASV pointed stable performance of wheat genotypes HI1650, GW547, HI1636 while lower values of MASV measure was observed for HI1669, NWS2194, HI1650 and the superiority index measure had observed the suitability of HI1650, GW547, HI1669 genotypes. Large values of GAI was observed for HI1669, HI1650, MACS6768 and genotypes HI1669, HI1650, GW322 expressed more values of HMGV values. Lower values of Si1 was exhibited by HI1650, NWS2194, GW547 and of Si2 had shown by HI1650, HI1669, HI1636 genotypes. Significant differences among the genotypes ranks was confirmed by sum of the values of Z1 only at 5 per cent level of significance. Hierarchical clustering observed that IPC3 had divided the measures as first group consistent of BLUP based analytic measures Meanb, HMRPGV*Mean, GAI, RPGV*Mean, with interaction principal components as well as NPi (3) , NPi (2), Si6 whereas the ASV, MASV, WAASB, IPC4, IPC5, NPi (1), NPi (4) along with Si1, Si4, Si7, Si5, Si2, Si3 measures in second group. Biplot analysis expressed the cluster of BLUP based analytic measures while adjacent cluster of Si6, NPi(3), NPi(2) was also placed in same quadrant. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azam, M.G., Hossain, M.A., Sarker, U., Alam, A.K.M.M., Nair, R.M., Roychowdhury, R., Ercisli, S.and Golokhvast, K.S. 2023. Genetic Analyses of Mungbean [Vignaradiata (L.) Wilczek] Breeding Traits for Selecting Superior Genotype(s) Using Multivariate and Multi-Traits Indexing Approaches. Plants, 12: 1984.

Bocianowski, J. and Prażak, R. 2022. Genotype by year interaction for selected quantitative traits in hybrid lines of Triticumaestivum L. with AegilopskotschyiBoiss. andAe. variabilisEig. using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica, 218 (2):11.

Hilmarsson, H.S., Rio, S., Sánchez, J.I. 2021. Genotype by environment interaction analysis of agronomic spring barley traits in Iceland using AMMI, factorial regression model and linear mixed model. Agronomy.11(3):499

Hossain, M.A., Sarker, U., Azam, M.G., Kobir, M.S., Roychowdhury, R., Ercisli, S., Ali, D., Oba, S., Golokhvast, K.S. 2023. Integrating BLUP, AMMI, and GGE Models to Explore GE Interactions for Adaptability and Stability of Winter Lentils (Lens culinarisMedik.).Plants, 12: 2079.

Jędzura, S., Bocianowski, J., & Matysik, P. 2023.The AMMI model application to analyze the genotype–environmental interaction of spring wheat grain yield for the breeding program purposes. Cereal Research Communications, 51: 197–205.

Karimizadeh R., Pezeshkpour P., Mirzaee A., Barzali M., Sharifi P., Safari Motlagh M.R. 2023. Stability analysis for seed yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes by experimental and biological approaches. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding.27(2):135-145.

Khalid, A., Hameed, A. and Tahir, M.F. 2023.Estimation of genetic divergence in wheat genotypes based on agro-morphological traits through agglomerative hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis. Cereal Research Communications, 51: 217–224.

Mohammadi, R., Sadeghzadeh, B., Ahmadi, M.M., Amri, A. 2020a. Biological interpretation of genotype × environment interaction in rainfed durum wheat. Cereal Res. Commun.48(4):547-554. DOI 10.1007/s42976-020-00056-7.

Mohammadi, R., Sadeghzadeh, B., Poursiahbidi, M.M., Ahmadi, M.M. 2020b. Integrating univariate and multivariate statistical models to investigate genotype × environment interaction in durum wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol.;178(3):450-465.

Mohammadi, R., Jafarzadeh, J., Poursiahbidi, M. M., Hossein, H. & Ahmed, A. 2023. Genotype-by-environment interaction and stability analysis for grain yield in durum wheat using GGE biplot and genotypic and environmental covariates. Agric. Res. 6: 1–11.

Mostafavi, K. & Saremirad, A. 2021. Genotype—environment interaction study in corn genotypes using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction method and GGE- biplot method. J. Crop Prod. 14: 1–12.

Olivoto, T., Lucio, A.D.C., da Silva J.A.G., Marchioro, V.S., de Souza, V.Q. 2019. Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials I: Combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agron. J. 111(6):2949-2960.

Pour-Aboughadareh ,A., Yousefian, M., Moradkhani, H., Poczai, P., Siddique, K.H.M .2019. STABILITYSOFT: a new online program to calculate parametric and non- parametric stability statistics for crop traits. Applied Plant Science, 7:e-1211.

Saeidnia, F., Taherian, M., & Nazeri, S.M. 2023.Graphical analysis of multi-environmental trials for wheat grain yield based on GGE-biplot analysis under diverse sowing dates. BMC Plant Biol, 23: 198.

Saremirad, A., &Taleghani, D. 2022.Utilization of univariate parametric and non-parametric methods in the stability analysis of sugar yield in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) hybrids. J. Crop Breed, 14: 49–63.

Sharif, P., Abbasian, A. & Mohaddesi, A. 2021. Evaluation the mean performance and stability of rice genotypes by combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques and selection based on multiple traits. Plant Genet. Res. 7: 163–180.

Shojaei, S.H., Mostafavi, K., Omrani, A., Omrani, S., Mousavi, S.M.N., Illes ,A., Bojtor, C., Nagy, J. 2021. Yield stability analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids using parametric and AMMI methods. HindawiSci, 2021:5576691.

Taleghani, D., Rajabi, A., Saremirad, A., Fasahat, P.. 2023. Stability analysis and selection of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes using AMMI, BLUP, GGE biplot and MTSI. Sci Rep, 13: 10019.

Vineeth, T. V., Prasad, I., Chinchmalatpure, A. R., Lokeshkumar, B. M., Kumar, S., Ravikiran, K. T., and Sharma, P. C. 2022. Weighted average absolute scores of BLUPs (WAASB) based selection of stable Asiatic cotton genotypes for the salt affected Vertisols of India. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 82: 104–108

Downloads

Published

2024-07-02

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): Journals Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture (July)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

verma, ajay, singh, bhudev, & singh, gyanender. (2024). Comprehensive genotype x environment interaction analysis of wheat genotypes evaluated under multi locations trials in the Central Zone of the country. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(2), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.18
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC