Yield dynamics and economic benefits of maize-wheat based cropping system under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Authors

  • Raveena Raveena Department of Agronomy, Chaudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur -176062
  • Rameshwar Kumar Principal Scientist, Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur -176062
  • Pooja Department of Agronomy, Chaudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur -176062
  • Ravi Kishan Soni Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture, RNB Global University, Bikaner, 334006, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.23

Keywords:

Economics, equivalent yield, Jeevamrit, Matka khad, natural farming , organic farming

Abstract

 

Two-year field experiment conducted during 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 to assess the impact of natural and organic farming techniques on the productivity and profitability of the maize-wheat-based cropping system indicated that adoption of organic farming techniques led to a significantly higher maize equivalent yield of the system. There was an increment in the system equivalent yield of T4 (Maize + soybean-wheat + lentil and jeevamrit spray at 14 days interval) by 118.96, 131.84, 143.66 and 126.94 per cent in the 1st year and 112.43, 137.98, 157.66 and 114.42 per cent in the 2nd year of experimentation over sole treatments. Organic farming practices also proved better in terms of various economic indicators, including gross returns, net returns, benefit-cost ratio and the profitability of the system. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Devakumar, N.; Rao, G.G.E.; Shubha, S.; Imrankhan, N. and Gowda, S.B. 2008. Activities of Organic Farming Research Centre. Navile, Shimoga, University Agriculture Science, Bangalore, Karnataka.

Hugar, H.Y. and Palled, Y.B. 2008. Effect of intercropped vegetables on maize and associated weeds in maize-vegetable intercropping systems. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(2), 159-161.

Singh, U.; Saad, A.A.; Hasan, B.; Singh, P. and Singh, S.R. 2008. Production potential and economics of intercropping of lentil (Lens culinaris) with brown sarson (Brassica compestris) and oat (Avena sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 53(2), 135-139.

FIBL & IFOAM. 2021. Organic International: The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends. p 53.

Anonymous. 2021. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India, New Delhi.

Stolze, M.; Piorr, A.; Haring, A.; Dabbert, S.; Lampkin, N. and Zanoli, R. 2000. The environmental impacts of organic farming in Europe. Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy. University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. 6, 127.

Lal, R.B. and Ray, S. 1976. Economics of crop production of different cropping intensities. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 46(2), 93-96.

Palekar, S. 2006. Shoonya Bandovalada Naisargika Krushi. Published by Swamy Anand, Agri Prakashana, Bengaluru, India.

Kumar, R. 2015. Influence of mulching, liming and farm yard manures on production potential, economics and quality of maize (Zea mays L.) under rainfed condition of Eastern Himalaya. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 44(3), 391-398.

Li X, Mu, Y. and Cheng, Y. 2012. Effects of intercropping sugarcane and soybean on growth, rhizosphere soil microbes, nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Polish Academy of Sciences. 10, 1-7.

Pal, M. and Molnar, J. 2021. Growing importance of cereals in nutrition and healthy life. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 5, 275-277.

Vasanthkumar, H.H.A. 2006. Jeevamrutha slurry preparation. Siri Sammruddhi 4-5.

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

Raveena, R., Kumar, R., Pooja, & Soni, R.K. (2024). Yield dynamics and economic benefits of maize-wheat based cropping system under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 19(2), 374–377. https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2024.19.02.23