Breeding, Healthcare and Marketing Practices of Goat Followed in Middle Gujarat

Authors

  • Mahendra N Jegoda Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Vaso-387380, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India
  • Vijay P Belsare Department of Livestock Farm Complex, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388001, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.4.12

Keywords:

Goat keepers, Healthcare, Marketing Management, Middlemen, Middle Gujarat

Abstract

A study was conducted in selected areas of Dahod and Kheda districts of Middle Gujarat to ascertain the breeding, health care and marketing management practices followed by goat keepers. The data was collected from randomly selected 240 goat keepers through personal interview with the help of pre-tested structured interview schedule. The study revealed that majority of goat keepers (96.67%) followed a flock mating system and bred their goat throughout the year (58.75%) by use of own flock buck (72.92%). More than two third  of goat keepers (67.08%) followed some controlled breeding criteria in a flock and more than half of the respondents (56.67%) selected the breeding buck based on physical characteristics. About 57.50 % of goat keepers practiced estrus symptoms in doe, viz., frequent bleating and buck-doe seeking behavior followed by tail wagging and mounting on another goat (42.50%). Only one fifth (20.0%) of goat keepers implemented to vaccinate their adult goats and majority of goat keepers (77.08%) got treated their sick goats by local quack or used home-made remedy and least treated by veterinary doctors. Majority of goat keepers (65.42%) isolated the sick goats from healthy flock and 74.58% practiced the disposal of placenta on thorny hedge or tree. Most goat keepers (70.42%) sold adult does/bucks and male youngsters from the flock to raise money for their families throughout the year, and they marketed adult goats when they were between 12 and 18 months old (72.50%) to increase their selling price based on the body weight and age of the goat (75.0%). Most goat keepers (98.75%) sold their goats straight into the local market (haat) (65.83%) during the festive season, followed by 34.17% who sold to middlemen or villagers' residents. The optimal breeding season was less common in the Kheda district, and there were disparities between districts more in the regulated (controlled) breeding practises, breeding buck selection criteria, isolation of sick goats, and goat marketing channels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adane, Y., & Girma, A. (2008). Economic significance of sheep and goats. In: Alemu Yami and R.C. Markel (eds). Sheepand Goat Production Handbook for Ethiopia. Ethiopia Sheep and Goats Productivity Improvement Program (ESGPIP), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 2-24.

Anonymous (2019). Report of 20th Livestock Census. Directorate of Animal Husbandry, Agriculture, Farmers Welfare and Co-operation Department, Government of Gujarat, India, Website. https://doah.gujarat.gov.in/livestock-census.htm.

Berhanu, G., Hoekstra, D., & Azege, T. (2006). Improving the competitiveness of agricultural input markets in Ethiopia. Proceeding of 26th time for New Thinking Triennial. 12-18 August, Gold Coast, Australia, pp.21-35.

Ekambaram, B., Gupta, B.R., Prakash, M., Sudhakar, K., & Reddy, V.R. (2011). Housing, breeding and management practices of Mahbubnagar goats. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 81(8), 875-879.

Lavania, P., Jingar, S.C., Dileep, K., Ajesh, K., & Kantwa, S.C. (2014). Feeding and health care management practices adopted by tribal goat farmers in Sirohi district of southern Rajasthan. Journal of Bio-Innovation, 3(3), 170-175.

Mordia, A., Sharma, M.C., Gurjar, M.L., & Nagda, R.K. (2018). Existing breeding and feeding practices of goat in Chittorgarh district of Rajasthan. Ruminant Science, 7(2), 297-300.

Rao, S.T.V., Raju, D.T., & Reddy, Y.R. (2008). Adoption of sheep husbandry practices in Andhra Pradesh, India. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20(7), Article #107, Retrieved May 21. 2023 http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/7/raju20107.htm.

Sabapara, G.P., Kharadi, V.B., Sorathiya, L.M., & Patel, D.C. (2014). Housing, health care and milking management practices followed by goat owners in Navsari district of Gujarat. Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 1(4), 164-167.

Sakthivel, K.M., Narmatha, N., Akila, N., & Uma, V. (2012). Management practices followed by goat farmers in Namakkal district of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants, 18(1), 125-128.

Sharma, M.C., Pathodiya, O.P., Jingar, S.C., & Gaur, M. (2007). A study on socio-economic status of goat rearers and adoption of management practices. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants, 13(1), 75-83.

Singh, M.K., Dixit, A.K., Roy, A.K., & Singh, S.K. (2013). Goat rearing: A pathway for sustainable livelihood security in Bundelkhand region. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 26, 79-88.

Singh, N.P., & Kumar, S. (2007). An alternative approach to research for harnessing production potential of goats. In: Proceedings of Fourth National Extension Congress, March 9-11, JNKVV, Jabalpur, India, pp. 5-9.

Snedecor, G.W., & Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Tanwar, P.S., & Rohilla, P. (2012). Goat management practices adopted by farmers in Jaipur district of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants, 18(1), 121-124.

Tanwar, P.S., Vaishanava, C.S., & Jain, L.S. (2007). Studies on housing and breeding management practices adopted by goat owners in tribal area of Udaipur district. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 41(1), 59-61.

Thiruvenkadan, A.K., Panneerselvam, S., & Kanadasamy, N. (2005). System of housing and management of Kanni Adu goats of southern Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 75(7), 827-829.

Published

2023-07-08

How to Cite

Jegoda, M.N., & Belsare, V.P. (2023). Breeding, Healthcare and Marketing Practices of Goat Followed in Middle Gujarat. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 19(4), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.4.12