Locking Reconstruction Plate for the Management of Diaphyseal Femoral Fracture in a Dog

Authors

  • Vijay Kumar V Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, PG Scholar of Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, India
  • Shiju Simon M Department of Clinics, faculty of Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, India
  • Pushkin Raj H Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, faculty of Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, India
  • Mahesh R Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, PhD Scholar of Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, India
  • Ayappan S Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, faculty of Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.2.25

Abstract

Fracture of the long bone is a commonly encountered orthopaedic problem in canine practice (Aithal et al.,1999). Femur fractures are one of the most common orthopaedic affections encountered in dogs comprising 35 %  of hind limb fractures and 24 %of all fractures in dogs (Johnson et al., 1998). Proximal and distal epiphyseal fractures happen in young animals, whereas diaphyseal and metaphyseal fractures are more frequent in older animals(Guiot et al., 2012, Abd El Raouf, 2017). They are difficult to repair due to the fact that such dogs are recumbent and need early rehabilitation to establish speedy recovery. The closeness of the abdominal wall to the proximal femur and surrounding heavy muscles limits the use of coaptation and external skeletal fixation for femoral fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd El Raouf M., Mekkawy N. H. M and AbdEl-Aal A.M., (2017). Femur fractures and treatment options in 20 dogs admitted to our clinic from January 2013 to December 2015. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences,31 (2):117-122.

Aithal, H. P., G. R. Singh and G. S. Bisht (1999). A study on incidence of fractures in animals and management of supra-condylar femoral fractures in dog. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery 20(1):15-21

DeCamp, C., S. A. Johnston, L. M. Dejardin and S. L. Schaefer (2016). Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedicsand Fracture Repair. 5th edition. Elsevier, Missouri. p:880.

Guiot, L. P., R. M.Demianiuk and L. M.Déjardin (2012). Fractures of the Femur. In: Tobias K. M., Johnston S. A, In Veterinary Surgery Small Animal, 1st ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier, pp. 865-905.

Johnson, L., C. W. Smith., J. David and Schaffer, (1998). Fragment reconstruction and bone plate fixation versus bridging plate fixation for treating highly comminuted femoral fracture in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.,213: 1157 – 1161.

Singh, K., N.Thakur,J. Mohindroo, A.Gopinathanand A. Mahajan (2011). Repair of supra-condylar fracture of femur in dogs. Indian Veterinary Journal 88(3): 85-87.

Sran, T. K., S. S. Singh, J. Mohindroo and N. S. Saini (2016) Frequency of long bone fractures in dogs:A retrospective study. Indian Journal of Veterinary surgery 37(1): 1-5.

Stiffler, K. S and Kevin, (2004). Internal fracture fixation. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice ,3: 105–113.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-02

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023): The Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology (IJVSBT) (Mar- Apr) 2023

Section

Case Report

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

V, V.K., M, S.S., H, P.R., R, M., & S, A. (2023). Locking Reconstruction Plate for the Management of Diaphyseal Femoral Fracture in a Dog. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 19(2), 117–118. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.2.25
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC