Radiographic Evaluation of Osteochondral Defect Repair using a Tissue-Engineered Scaffold with and without Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Rabbits

Authors

  • Mursaleen Rashid Division of Veterinary Surgery & Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Shuhama, SKUAST-K, Sringar-190006, Kashmir, India
  • Shahid Hussain Dar Division of Veterinary Clinical Complex, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Shuhama, SKUAST-K, Sringar-190006, Kashmir, India
  • Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo Assistant Professor, Division of Veterinary Clinical Complex, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Shuhama, SKUAST-K, Sringar-190006, Kashmir, India.
  • Showkat Ahmad Shah Division of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Shuhama, SKUAST-K, Sringar-190006, Kashmir, India
  • Amatul Muhee Division of Veterinary Clinical Complex, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Shuhama, SKUAST-K, Sringar-190006, Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.22.2.34

Keywords:

Bone marrow MS cells, Osteochondral defect, Rabbit, Scaffold.

Abstract

The regeneration of osteochondral defects remains a major clinical challenge due to the limited regenerative capacity of articular cartilage and the structural complexity of the osteochondral unit. Simultaneous regeneration of cartilage and subchondral bone with seamless integration at their interface is required for the effective repair. The current study was carried out to develop and evaluate an effective tissue engineered scaffold with or without bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) for regeneration of osteochondral defects. An in vivo study was carried out in New Zealand white rabbits (n=24) randomly distributed into 3 groups as per the treatment protocol. Standardized osteochondral defects were created in the trochlear groove of the left distal femur. The radiographic evaluation on day 45 post surgery revealed moderate increase in radiopacity in both groups II and III, while substantial increase in defect radiopacity was seen at day 90. At day 90 radiographic characteristics had improved compared to day 45 in test scaffold as well as BM-MSC seeded scaffold group animals compared to the untreated group animals. Radiographic evaluation corroborated these findings, demonstrating progressive defect filling, restoration of surface contour, and gradual mineralization of subchondral bone without pathological changes. These findings suggest that the developed scaffold, particularly when combined with BM-MSCs, effectively supports osteochondral regeneration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arden, N. K., Perry, T. A., Bannuru, R. R., Bruyère, O., Cooper, C., Haugen, I. K., & Reginster, J. Y. (2021). Non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis: Comparison of ESCEO and OARSI 2019 guidelines. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 17(1), 59–66.

Dai, W., Cheng, J., Yan, W., Cao, C., Zhao, F., Li, Q., & Ao, Y. (2023). Enhanced osteochondral repair with hyaline cartilage formation using an extracellular matrix-inspired natural scaffold. Science Bulletin, 68(17), 1904–1917.

Gugjoo, M. B., Amarpal, Abdelbaset-Ismail, A., Aithal, H. P., Kinjavdekar, P., Kumar, G. S., & Sharma, G. T. (2020). Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors in gel scaffold repair osteochondral defects in rabbits. Regenerative Medicine, 15(2), 1261–1275.

Lin, C. Y., Wang, Y. L., Chen, Y. J., Ho, C. T., Chi, Y. H., Chan, L. Y., & Hung, S. C. (2022). Collagen-binding peptides for enhanced imaging, lubrication and regeneration of osteoarthritic cartilage. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 6(10), 1105–1117.

Lou, W., Qiu, X., Qin, Y., Lu, Y., Cao, Y., & Lu, H. (2025). 3D-printed scaffold armed with skeletal stem cell-derived exosomes enhances osteochondral regeneration. Bioactive Materials, 51, 231–256.

Nikhil, A., Gugjoo, M. B., Das, A., Manzoor, T., Ahmad, S. M., Ganai, N. A., & Kumar, A. (2024). Multilayered cryogel enriched with exosomes regenerates cartilage architecture in goat osteochondral injuries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 16(47), 64505–64521.

Tamaddon, M., Blunn, G., Tan, R., Yang, P., Sun, X., Chen, S. M., & Liu, C. (2022). In vivo evaluation of additively manufactured multilayered scaffold for repair of large osteochondral defects. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 5(3), 481–496.

Tang, S. A., Zhang, C., Oo, W. M., Fu, K., Risberg, M. A., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M., & Hunter, D. J. (2025). Osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 11(1), 1–22.

Tortorici, M., Petersen, A., Ehrhart, K., Duda, G. N., & Checa, S. (2021). Scaffold-dependent mechanical and architectural cues guide osteochondral defect healing in silico. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, 642217.

Voltes-Martínez, A., Martínez-Moreno, D., Pleguezuelos-Beltrán, P., Nygren-Jiménez, E., Lopez-Ruiz, E., & Marchal, J. A. (2025). Advances in mimetic extracellular matrix-based biofabricated scaffolds enriched with hydroxyapatite for osteochondral regeneration. Biofabrication, 17(1), 012001.

Zhou, H., Yuan, L., Xu, Z., Yi, X., Wu, X., Mu, C., & Li, D. (2022). Fabrication of heterogeneous three-layer scaffold mimicking osteochondral tissue. ACS Applied BioMaterials, 5(2), 734–746.

Published

2026-03-10

How to Cite

Rashid, M., Dar, S. H., Gugjoo, M. B., Shah, S. A., & Muhee, A. (2026). Radiographic Evaluation of Osteochondral Defect Repair using a Tissue-Engineered Scaffold with and without Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Rabbits . Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 22(2), 178-181. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.22.2.34