Complications of Cataract Surgery Following Phacoemulsification and Foldable Intraocular Lens Implantation in Dogs

Authors

  • Darshan J Chauhan Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India
  • Shivaji H Talekar Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India
  • Krina D Patel Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India
  • Hardik A Rokad Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India
  • Raghuvir H Bhatt Veterinary Clinical Complex, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India
  • Jignesh V Vadalia Veterinary Clinical Complex, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India
  • Vishnudeo Kumar Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.6.08

Keywords:

Cataract, Complications, Dogs, Intraocular lens, Phacoemulsification

Abstract

Cataracts are the most common treatable cause of visual impairment and blindness in dogs. Despite tremendous improvements in canine cataract surgery over the years, numerous intra- and post-operative complications persist and decrease the success rate of cataract surgery. The present study was conducted on 12 eyes of 12 distinct dogs presented to Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology of the College in Junagadh (Gujarat) to evaluate intra- and post-operative complications after phacoemulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation. Prior to surgery, all dogs were subjected to a detailed ophthalmic examination along with routine clinical, haematological and serum biochemical analysis. In all twelve dogs, phacoemulsification technique was utilised for the surgical removal of the cataractous lens and implantation of intra-ocular lens under premedication with Atropine sulphate, induction with combination of Ketamine-Diazepam and maintenance with Isoflurane. Intra-operative complications recorded were radial tear during continuous curvilinear capsulotomy, miosis, chemosis, hyphema and post-operative complications recorded were corneal opacity, corneal edema, uveitis, ocular hypertension and bullous keratopathy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, R., Saini, N.S., Mahajan, S.K., Mohindroo, J., & Singh, S.S. (2017). Comparison of rigid polymethylmethacrylate and foldable square edge acrylic lens replacement for management of cataract after phacoemulsification in 22 eyes of dogs. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 51(1), 146-150.

Bras, I.D., Colitz, C.M.H., Saville, W.J.A., Gemensky-Metzler, A.J., & Wilkie, D.A. (2006). Posterior capsule opacification in diabetic and nondiabetic canine patients following cataract surgery. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 9(5), 317-327.

Brikshavana, P. (2007). Success rate and postoperative complications of phacoemulsification in 25 cataractous eyes: A retrospective study in 20 dogs (2003-2005). The Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 37(2), 53-60.

Dziezyc, J. (1990). Cataract surgery: Current approaches. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 20(3), 737-754.

Gelatt, K.N., & Wilkie, D.A. (2011). Surgical procedures of the lens and cataracts. In: K.N. Gelatt and J.P. Gelatt (Eds.), Veterinary Ophthalmic Surgery, 1st ed., Elsevier, pp. 304-355.

Gift, B.W., English, R.V., Nadelstein, B., Weigt, A.K., & Gilger, B.C. (2009). Comparison of capsular opacification and refractive status after placement of three different intraocular lens implants following phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataracts in dogs. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 12(1), 13-21.

Harshith, B.H. (2019). Surgical management of cataract by phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in dogs. Master’s Thesis. Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Kelawala, D.N. (2017). Studies on phacoemulsification in cataractous dogs. Ph.D. thesis. Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India.

Klein, H.E., Krohne, S.G., Moore, G.E., & Stiles, J. (2011). Postoperative complications and visual outcomes of phacoemulsification in 103 dogs (179 eyes): 2006-2008, Veterinary Ophthalmology, 14(2), 114-120.

Nikeghbali, A., Falavarjani, K.G., & Kheirkhah, A. (2008). Pupil dilation with intracameral lidocaine during phacoemulsification: Benefits for the patient and surgeon. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 56, 63-64.

Raghuvanshi, P.D.S., & Maiti, S.K. (2013). Canine cataract and its management: An overview. Journal of Animal Research, 3(1), 17-26.

Shukla, H.B. (2020). Comparative evaluation of extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification of cataractous lens in dogs. Master’s thesis. Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Tuntivanich, P., & Tuntivanich, N. (2007). Phacofragmentation and aspiration in canine mature cataract: surgical technique, success rate and complications. The Thai Veterinary Medicine, 37(2), 33-45.

Wang, B., Dong, N., Xu, B., Liu, J., & Xiao, L. (2013). Efficacy and safety of intracameral triamcinolone acetonide to control postoperative inflammation after phacotrabeculectomy. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 39(11), 1691-1697.

Whitley, R.D., McLaghlin, S.A., Whitley, E.M., & Gilger, B.C. (1993). Cataract removal in dogs: The surgical techniques. Veterinary Medicine, 88(9), 859-866.

Published

2023-11-07

How to Cite

Chauhan, D.J., Talekar, S.H., Patel, K.D., Rokad, H.A., Bhatt, R.H., Vadalia, J.V., & Kumar, V. (2023). Complications of Cataract Surgery Following Phacoemulsification and Foldable Intraocular Lens Implantation in Dogs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 19(6), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.19.6.08