A Survey to Evaluate Zoological Park Visitor's Satisfaction

Authors

  • Ramneet Kaur RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Author

Keywords:

Eco-tourism, Nandankanan Zoological Park, Questionnaire Survey, Satisfaction Level, Visitor's Satisfaction

Abstract

Tourism is a significant development driver for financial and  social development, job creation, and poverty alleviation. It  also has a significant responsibility to contribute in encouraging  the state's economic development to be quicker, more  sustainable, and more inclusive. India has the most diverse  terrain and climate, allowing a diverse variety of plants and  animals to thrive. Including its very old cultural history, a  plethora of landmarks, and nature's bounty, Odisha epitomizes  a thriving tourist industry. Zoos have long been popular  meeting places for families and friends, and many individuals  find psychological solace in taking in the natural environment  and engaging with animals. Zoo visitors come to the zoo with  a diverse set of motivations, interests, and knowledge about  animal conservation and environmental problems. The main  goal of this study is to determine the degree of satisfaction of  zoological park visitors at Nandankanan based on several  factors such as communication, visibility, and information  availability. From September to December 2016, data was  gathered from 250 visitors in a random sample utilizing  structured questionnaires. The majority of tourists are pleased  with communication facilities, information availability, and  enclosure, visibility, and guide services. To fulfil the overall  level of satisfaction of tourists, the lot of wildlife, exhibition  services, leisure facilities, and other amenities need to be  improved. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Carr N. An analysis of zoo visitors’ favourite and least favourite animals. Tour Manag Perspect. 2016; [2]. et al. DIVERSITY OF TRUE AND MANGROVE ASSOCIATES OF BHITARKANIKA NATIONAL PARK (ODISHA), INDIA. Int J Adv Res. 2017; [3]. Esty BC. Why study large projects? An introduction to research on project finance. Eur Financ Manag. 2004;10(2):213–24.

. Lemelin B, Abdel Sabour SA, Poulin R. Valuing Mine 2 at Raglan using real options. Int J Mining, Reclam Environ. 2006;20(1):46–56.

. Franco Modigliani; Merton H. Miller. The cost of capital, corporation finance and theory of investment. J Craniomandib Disord. 1958;5(1):19–27.

. Kim SG. Risk performance indexes and measurement systems for mega construction projects. J Civ Eng Manag. 2010;16(4):586–94.

. de Palma A, Picard N, Andrieu L. Risk in Transport Investments. Networks Spat Econ. 2012;12(2):187–204. [8]. Ohlan R. The relationship between tourism, financial development and economic growth in India. Futur Bus J. 2017;

. Goswami PK, Goswami G. Wideband sensing antenna for smart cognitive radio applications. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

. Goel S, Dwivedi RK, Sharma A. Analysis of social network using data mining techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

. Gupta A, Pant V, Kumar S, Bansal PK. Bank loan prediction system using machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

. Rai J, Tripathi RC, Gulati N. A comparative study of implementing innovation in education sector due to COVID-19. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

. Dhingra M, Mudgal RK. Applications of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use: A Review. In: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2019. 2020.

. Tripathi S, Verma PK, Goswami G. A review on SMART GRID power system network. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

. Doloi H. Assessing stakeholders’ influence on social performance of infrastructure projects. Facilities. 2012;30(11):531–50.

. Bruzelius N, Flyvbjerg B, Rothengatter W. Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects. Transp Policy. 2002;9(2):143–54.

. Paling W. Planning a Future for Phnom Penh: Mega Projects, Aid Dependence and Disjointed Governance. Urban Stud. 2012;49(13):2889–912.

. Medina-Lopez C, Marin-Garcia JA, Alfalla-Luque R. Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía (A methodological proposal for the systematic literature review). WPOM-Working Pap Oper Manag. 2010;1(2):13.

. Golden Trianglr Odisha.

. Shaw A. Public perception of conservation work by UK zoos.

. Lee HS. Measurement of visitors’ satisfaction with public zoos in Korea using importance-performance analysis. Tour Manag. 2015;

. Ryan C, Saward J. The zoo as ecotourism attraction - visitor reactions, perceptions and management implications: The case of hamilton zoo, New Zealand. J Sustain Tour. 2004;

. Karanikola P, Tampakis S, Tsantopoulos G, Digbasani C. The public zoo as recreation and environmental education area: Visitor’s perceptions and management implications. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev. 2014;

. Hamilton JA, Crompton JL, More TA. Identifying the dimensions of service quality in a park context. J Environ Manage. 1991;

. Annual Report.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

A Survey to Evaluate Zoological Park Visitor’s Satisfaction . (2021). International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management, 8(6), 504–509. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijirem/article/view/11747