A Research Gap in Large-Project Financial Management

Authors

  • Jyotsna Sharma RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India Author

Keywords:

Financial, Management, Megaprojects, Projects, Risk, Social

Abstract

This article discusses financial management research in  major projects published in publications with high influence.  Our objective is to discover answers to the following  questions from the study: (a) what financial features are being  studied? (b) Financial concepts for big project management?  The approach utilised was a bibliographical analytic of  research articles produced between 2000 and 2013 in the  major databases. Our findings show that success is the most  prominent element, despite the fact that there is still no  agreement on performance evaluation. Whereas in recent  years there has been a rise in the quantity of papers in this  field, there is also the absence of high-impact journals.  Example studies (almost 60%), with only one case covered in  most situations, and are the most often utilised approach.  Financial efficiency is the most frequently studied topic; however, no consensus has yet been reached on how to assess  megaproject performance. A megaproject evaluation is rarely  carried out, even though it is the financial objective of any  company. Fiscal research and analyses of the key  programmes' financial framework are likewise scarce. Such  similar research areas of focus include stakeholder or risk  management, as well as public-private partnerships. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Esty BC, Sesia A. An Overview of Project Finance & Infrastructure Finance---2006 Update. Harvard Busines Sch. 2007;Case No. 2.

Franco Modigliani; Merton H. Miller. The cost of capital, corporation finance and theory of investment. J Craniomandib Disord. 1958;5(1):19–27.

Esty BC. Why study large projects? An introduction to research on project finance. Eur Financ Manag. 2004;10(2):213–24.

de Palma A, Picard N, Andrieu L. Risk in Transport Investments. Networks Spat Econ. 2012;12(2):187–204. [5] Tripathi S, Verma PK, Goswami G. A review on SMART GRID power system network. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

. Dhingra M, Mudgal RK. Applications of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use: A Review. In: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2019. 2020.

. Lemelin B, Abdel Sabour SA, Poulin R. Valuing Mine 2 at Raglan using real options. Int J Mining, Reclam Environ. 2006;20(1):46–56.

. Kim SG. Risk performance indexes and measurement systems for mega construction projects. J Civ Eng Manag. 2010;16(4):586–94.

. Medina-Lopez C, Marin-Garcia JA, Alfalla-Luque R. Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía (A methodological proposal for the systematic literature review). WPOM-Working Pap Oper Manag. 2010;1(2):13.

Gupta A, Pant V, Kumar S, Bansal PK. Bank loan prediction system using machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

Rastogi A, Singh R, Sharma R, Kalony SD. The survey of digital image analysis with artificial intelligence DCNN technique. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020. [12] Goel S, Dwivedi RK, Sharma A. Analysis of social

network using data mining techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

Goswami PK, Goswami G. Wideband sensing antenna for smart cognitive radio applications. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

Srivastava R, Mishra RP, Kumar V, Shukla HK, Goyal N, Singh C. Android malware detection amid COVID 19. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

Rai J, Tripathi RC, Gulati N. A comparative study of implementing innovation in education sector due to COVID-19. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

Rajput GK, Kumar A, Kundu S. A comparative study on sentiment analysis approaches and methods. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

Doloi H. Assessing stakeholders’ influence on social performance of infrastructure projects. Facilities. 2012;30(11):531–50.

Paling W. Planning a Future for Phnom Penh: Mega Projects, Aid Dependence and Disjointed Governance. Urban Stud. 2012;49(13):2889–912.

Kumar V, Mangal D, Pandy P. Is the Lean Approach Beneficial for the Manufacturing Sector: Review on Literature. In: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2019. 2020.

Bruzelius N, Flyvbjerg B, Rothengatter W. Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects. Transp Policy. 2002;9(2):143–54.

Saraswat M, Tripathi RC. Cloud Computing: Comparison and Analysis of Cloud Service Providers AWs, Microsoft and Google. In: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, SMART 2020. 2020.

Kumar S, Jain A, Shukla AP, Singh S, Raja R, Rani S, et al. A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Detection of Organic and Nonorganic Cotton Diseases. Math Probl Eng. 2021;

Downloads

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

A Research Gap in Large-Project Financial Management . (2021). International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management, 8(6), 486–490. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijirem/article/view/11742