Linking Economic and Industrial Development to Urbanization: Case of Dholera Special Investment Region-Gujarat
Keywords:
Dholera Special Investment Region, Greenfield, Special Investment Region, Worlding strategyAbstract
In the last two decades, post Industrialization cities have been conceived as product of global aspiration and identity. This paper attempts to understand the transformative model of governance adopted in development of the Dholera Special Investment Region in the domain of private partnership and exclusive planning strategies. It explores the role of speculation and making the city a spectacle in the planning of Dholera Special Investment Region. Working on the intersection of these broad theories of the mode of governance, it analyses the Special Investment Region Act, as a facilitator to the growth corridor project and investigates the role of the State in the conceptualization and execution of mega project. The greenfield project reflects the transnational circular economy and urban policies that have brought a paradigm shift in the planning and development of cities in Neo-Liberal Era. It investigates the implications of SIR Act, 2009 on a greenfield project in reference to the right to the city. It argues that for the case of Special Investment Region, Urbanization is seen as a byproduct of the transformative economic and industrial policies.
Downloads
References
F. Savini, “The economy that runs on waste: accumulation in the circular city,” J. Environ. Policy Plan., 2019, doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1670048.
S. Cengiz, S. Görmüş, and D. Oğuz, “Analysis of the urban growth pattern through spatial metrics; Ankara City,” Land use policy, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105812.
F. Bartholomae, C. Woon Nam, and A. Schoenberg, “Urban shrinkage and resurgence in Germany,” Urban Stud., 2017, doi: 10.1177/0042098016657780.
A. Datta, “New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat,” Dialogues Hum. Geogr., 2015, doi:
1177/2043820614565748.
S. Gururani and L. Kennedy, “The Co-production of Space, Politics and Subjectivities in India’s Urban Peripheries,” South Asia Multidiscip. Acad. J., 2021, doi: 10.4000/samaj.7365.
A. Datta, “Dialogues in Human Geography ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat New urban utopias of postcolonial India,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. Crossref, 2012.
C. Mcfarlane, Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. 2011.
P. Healey, “Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage,” Plan. Theory Pract., 2013, doi: 10.1080/14649357.2013.793574.
C. McFarlane, “Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements,” Geoforum, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003.
C. Mcfarlane, “Translocal assemblages : learning , space and development,” Development, 2009.
G. DeVerteuil and D. Manley, “Overseas investment into London: Imprint, impact and pied-à-terre urbanism,” Environ. Plan. A, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0308518X17694361.
R. Ghosn and E. H. Jazairy, “Trash Peaks: A Terrarium of the Anthropocene,” Archit. Des., 2020, doi: 10.1002/ad.2522.
J. Penny, “‘Revenue Generating Machines’? London’s Local Housing Companies and the Emergence of Local State Rentierism,” Antipode, 2022, doi: 10.1111/anti.12774.
L. Vodanovic, “Luxurious Dump: Wasted Buildings and the Landscape of Pure Suspension,” M/C J., 2010, doi: 10.5204/mcj.251.
A. Roy and A. Ong, Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of being Global. 2011.
O. Söderström, “Worlding Cities. Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global,” Geogr. Helv., 2013, doi: 10.5194/gh-68-77-2013.
M. A. de A. Teixeira, “ROY, Ananya & ONG, Aihwa. Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the art of being global,” Anuário Antropológico, 2013, doi: 10.4000/aa.544.
