Strength Analysis of Metakaolin Based Concrete in Presence of Waste Foundry Sand
Keywords:
Concrete, Metakaolin, Waste Foundry Sand, Strength, EnvironmentAbstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the results that would be obtained by exchanging cement for metakaolin and fine aggregate for waste foundry sand. For the purpose of this inquiry, M-30 grade concrete is produced, and it is examined for characteristics of hardened concrete such as compressive strength. Samples with required dimensions were utilised with Metakaolin at a constant 10 percent, and the fine aggregate was replaced with waste foundry sand at weight percentages of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 percent. Based on the findings, it appears that improving the mechanical properties of concrete by mixing in Metakaolin and waste foundry sand is beneficial. The best results were obtained by replacing cement and sand with Metakaolin at a percentage of 10 percent and waste foundry sand at a percentage of 30 percent, respectively. The findings indicate that, up to a certain amount of Waste foundry sand and Metakaolin addition, there is a gain in mix strength; however, after that point, further addition of the Metakaolin and Waste foundry sand begins to lower mix strength. Despite the fact that adding Metakaolin and waste foundry sand up to a level of ten percent and thirty percent, respectively, helps in achieving higher strength than conventional concrete, the inclusion of these materials is not required. As a result, the use of metakaolin and waste foundry sand in place of traditional sand aids in the development of green concrete that is both kind to the environment and durable.
Downloads
References
M. A. S. Anjos, A. Camões, P. Campos, G. A. Azeredo, and R. L. S. Ferreira, “Effect of high volume fly ash and metakaolin with and without hydrated lime on the properties of self-compacting concrete,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 27, no. April 2019, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100985.
S. C. Taylor-Lange, K. A. Riding, and M. C. G. Juenger, “Increasing the reactivity of metakaolin-cement blends using zinc oxide,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 835– 847, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.03.004.
K. Weise, N. Ukrainczyk, A. Duncan, and E. Koenders, “Enhanced Metakaolin Reactivity in Blended Cement with Additional Calcium Hydroxide,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15010367.
L. Chen, K. Zheng, T. Xia, and G. Long, “Mechanical property, sorptivity and microstructure of steam-cured concrete incorporated with the combination of metakaolin limestone,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 11, p. e00267, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00267.
R. Garg, R. Garg, and S. Singla, “Experimental Investigation of Electrochemical Corrosion and Chloride Penetration of Concrete Incorporating Colloidal Nanosilica and Silica Fume,” J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 440– 452, 2021, doi: 10.33961/JECST.2020.01788.
A. Albidah, M. Alghannam, H. Abbas, T. Almusallam, and Y. Al-Salloum, “Characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete for different mix design parameters,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 10, pp. 84–98, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.104.
K. Lazaar, W. Hajjaji, B. Moussi, F. Rocha, J. Labrincha, and F. Jamoussi, “Metakaolin and demolition wastes in eco-based sand consolidated concrete,” Bol. la Soc. Esp. Ceram. y Vidr., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 229–242, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bsecv.2020.02.004.
Rishav Garg, Manjeet Bansal, and Yogesh Aggarwal, “Split Tensile Strength of Cement Mortar Incorporating Micro and Nano Silica at Early Ages,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 5, no. 04, pp. 16–19, 2016, doi: 10.17577/ijertv5is040078.
J. M. Khatib, R. Siddique, C. Halliday, and S. Khatib, “Lime activated fly ash paste in the presence of metakaolin,” in Procedia Engineering, 2014, vol. 95, pp. 415–418.
N. Chalangaran, A. Farzampour, and N. Paslar, “Nano Silica and Metakaolin Effects on the Behavior of Concrete Containing Rubber Crumbs,” CivilEng, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 264–274, 2020, doi: 10.3390/civileng1030017.
H. Sharma, R. Garg, D. Sharma, and G. Sharma, “Investigation On Compressive Strength Of Concrete Using Microsilica And Optimised Dose Of Nanosilica As A Partial Replacement Of Cement,” Int. J. New. Inn., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 547–555, 2016.
D. L. Pillay, O. B. Olalusi, M. W. Kiliswa, P. O. Awoyera, J. T. Kolawole, and A. J. Babafemi, “Engineering performance of metakaolin based concrete,” Clean. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. April 2021, p. 100383, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100383.
M. J. Moradi, M. Khaleghi, J. Salimi, V. Farhangi, and A. M. Ramezanianpour, “Predicting the compressive strength of concrete containing metakaolin with different properties using ANN,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 183, no. June, p. 109790, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109790.
G. Angelin Lincy and R. Velkennedy, “Experimental optimization of metakaolin and nanosilica composite for geopolymer concrete paver blocks,” Struct. Concr., vol. 22, no. S1, pp. E442–E451, 2021, doi: 10.1002/suco.201900555.
R. Garg et al., “Biosynthesized silica-based zinc oxide nanocomposites for the sequestration of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions,” J. King Saud Univ. - Sci., vol. 34, no. 4, p. 101996, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101996.
N. Shafiq, R. Kumar, M. Zahid, and R. F. Tufail, “Effects of modified metakaolin using nano-silica on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 1–22, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma12142291.
H. K. Shehab El-Din, A. S. Eisa, B. H. Abdel Aziz, and A. Ibrahim, “Mechanical performance of high strength concrete made from high volume of Metakaolin and hybrid fibers,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 140, pp. 203–209, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.118.
H. Sharma, R. Garg, D. Sharma, M. umar Beg, and R. Sharma, “Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using Microsilica and Optimised dose of Nanosilica as a Partial Replacement of Cement,” Int. J. Recent Reasearch Asp., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 23–29, 2016.
S. Dadsetan and J. Bai, “Mechanical and microstructural properties of self-compacting concrete blended with metakaolin, ground granulated blast-furnace slag and fly ash,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 146, pp. 658–667, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.158.
R. Garg, R. Garg, and N. O. Eddy, “Influence of pozzolans on properties of cementitious materials : A review,” Adv. nano Res., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 423–436, 2021.
A. Machner, M. Zajac, M. Ben Haha, K. O. Kjellsen, M. R. Geiker, and K. De Weerdt, “Stability of the hydrate phase assemblage in Portland composite cements containing dolomite and metakaolin after leaching, carbonation, and
chloride exposure,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 89, pp. 89– 106, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.013. [22] S. Sujjavanich, P. Suwanvitaya, D. Chaysuwan, and G. Heness, “Synergistic effect of metakaolin and fly ash on properties of concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 155, pp. 830–837, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.072. [23] R. Garcia, M. A. de la Rubia, E. Enriquez, A. del Campo, J. Fernandez, and A. Moragues, “Chloride binding capacity of metakaolin and nanosilica supplementary pozzolanic cementitious materials in aqueous phase,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 298, p. 123903, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123903.
D. da Silva Andrade, J. H. da Silva Rêgo, P. Cesar Morais, and M. Frías Rojas, “Chemical and mechanical characterization of ternary cement pastes containing metakaolin and nanosilica,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 159, pp. 18–26, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.123.
R. Sharma, D. Sharma, and R. Garg, “Development of Self Compacted High Strength Concrete using Steel Slag as Partial Replacement of Coarse Aggregate,” Int. J. New. Inn., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 556–562, 2016.
N. Saboo, S. Shivhare, K. K. Kori, and A. K. Chandrappa, “Effect of fly ash and metakaolin on pervious concrete properties,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 223, pp. 322–328, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.185.
