Surrogacy in The Media: Depictions of Reproductive Sovereignty and Susceptibility

Authors

  • Hitesh Tikyani Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India Author

Keywords:

Media, Reproductive Citizenship, Reproductive Travel, Surrogacy, Vulnerability

Abstract

Researchers elaborated on the idea of  ‘reproductive citizenship,' suggesting that individuals who  make a reproductive contribution to modern western  countries accumulate cultural capital in a homogenous  manner. There has been some debate over whether or not  reproduction is a characteristic of modern citizenship, but  this article argues that it is, with reproductive hetero-sex  being the standard against which other forms are measured.  According to this theory, living outside of the norm creates a  weakness known as ‘reproductive vulnerability,' which is a  state of vulnerability. By examining media portrayals of  Australians who have travelled to India for surrogacy  agreements, this study shows how Couples who journey for  childbearing objectives have their fertility fragility stressed  only to be ignored. The research closes by discussing the  many, mutually incompatible dangers that are regarded and  the portrayal of which stimulates, rather than hinders,  thorough consideration of perinatal travel consideration of  all people's reproductive desires

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Arvidsson, S. Johnsdotter, and B. Essén, “Views of Swedish commissioning parents relating to the exploitation discourse in using transnational surrogacy,” PLoS One, 2015.

S. Z. Nejad, F. R. Tehrani, and A. Zadeh-Vakili, “The role of Kisspeptin in female reproduction,” International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2017.

C. You et al., “Estimation of the time-varying reproduction number of COVID-19 outbreak in China,” Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 2020.

M. V. Sauer, “Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health,” Fertility and Sterility. 2015.

G. Oulahen, “Flood hazards, environmental rewards, and the social reproduction of risk,” Geoforum, 2021.

N. Chintalapudi, G. Battineni, G. G. Sagaro, and F. Amenta, “COVID-19 outbreak reproduction number estimations and forecasting in Marche, Italy,” Int. J. Infect. Dis., 2020.

N. Gamble and L. Ghevaert, “International Surrogacy : Payments , Public Policy and Media Hype,” Fam. Law, 2011. [8] D. A. Murphy, “The Desire for Parenthood: Gay Men Choosing to Become Parents Through Surrogacy,” J. Fam. Issues, 2013.

O. van den Akker, P. Fronek, E. Blyth, and L. Frith, “‘This neo-natal ménage à trois’: British media framing of transnational surrogacy,” J. Reprod. Infant Psychol., 2016.

S. Markens, “The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy,” Soc. Sci. Med., 2012.

A. Edwards, W. Housley, M. Williams, L. Sloan, and M. Williams, “Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: Surrogacy, augmentation and re orientation,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol., 2013.

D. W. Riggs and C. Due, “Representations of reproductive citizenship and vulnerability in media reports of offshore surrogacy,” Citizensh. Stud., 2013.

K. Cassell and W. Ng, “Sex and reproduction,” Yale J. Biol. Med., 2020.

P. L. Delamater, E. J. Street, T. F. Leslie, Y. T. Yang, and K. H. Jacobsen, “Complexity of the basic reproduction number (R0),” Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2019.

P. van den Driessche, “Reproduction numbers of infectious disease models,” Infectious Disease Modelling. 2017. [16] M. E. Zubizarreta and S. Xiao, “Bioengineering models of female reproduction,” Bio-Design and Manufacturing. 2020. [17] K. Linka, M. Peirlinck, and E. Kuhl, “The reproduction number of COVID-19 and its correlation with public health interventions,” Comput. Mech., 2020.

D. W. Riggs, “Making matter matter: Meanings accorded to genetic material among Australian gay men,” Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online, 2018.

E. Shim, A. Tariq, W. Choi, Y. Lee, and G. Chowell, “Transmission potential and severity of COVID-19 in South Korea,” Int. J. Infect. Dis., 2020.

E. Braunstein, R. Bouhia, and S. Seguino, “Social reproduction, gender equality and economic growth,” Cambridge J. Econ., 2020.

L. C. Delamuta et al., “Coronavirus disease 2019 and human reproduction: A changing perspective,” Clinics. 2021. [22] A. Hewetson et al., “Functional amyloids in reproduction,” Biomolecules. 2017.

M. J. D’Occhio, P. S. Baruselli, and G. Campanile, “Metabolic health, the metabolome and reproduction in female cattle: a review,” Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2019.

D. A. Murphy, “The Desire for Parenthood,” J. Fam. Issues, 2013.

S. Fantus, “The path to parenthood isn’t always straight: A qualitative exploration of the experiences of gestational surrogacy for gay men in Canada---perspectives of gay fathers and surrogates.,” Diss. Abstr. Int. Sect. A Humanit. Soc. Sci., 2018.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-30

How to Cite

Surrogacy in The Media: Depictions of Reproductive Sovereignty and Susceptibility . (2021). International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology, 9(4), 102–106. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijircst/article/view/11397