In India, There Are Social Divisions in Education
Keywords:
Caste, Education, Gender, Religion, Social InequalitiesAbstract
The variations for 6-14-year-old India children in primary school enrollment by gender across three socioeconomic divisions, namely bottom and top caste Hindus, and Muslims, are described and analyzed in this study. It also looks at how inter-community and gender disparities evolved throughout the 1990s decade. India saw extraordinary economic development during this decade, and overall enrollment rates soared. The amount of information on how social disparities evolved throughout this time period is still minimal. This study examines this using data from The National Family Health Survey (NFHS) was conducted twice, with 108,899 youngsters in 1992/3 and 104,714 children in 1998/9. The consumer durables index is based on owning twelve different items like a refrigerators or a motorbike. High caste Hindus have more daily necessities and land than that of the other two groups, with Muslims having minimal land and lesser caste Hindus having the fewest durables.
Downloads
References
M. C. Le Floch, “Une relecture du sale boulot. Entre une division morale et une division sociale du travail éducatif,” Pensee Plurielle, 2008.
“Engaging schools: fostering high school students’ motivation to learn,” Choice Rev. Online, 2004.
Suyatno, Jumintono, D. I. Pambudi, A. Mardati, and Wantini, “Strategy of values education in the Indonesian education system,” Int. J. Instr., 2019.
M. D. González-Zamar, E. Abad-Segura, E. López-Meneses, and J. Gómez-Galán, “Managing ICT for sustainable education: Research analysis in the context of higher education,” Sustain., 2020.
P. Pimthong and J. Williams, “Preservice teachers’ understanding of STEM education,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., 2020.
M. P. B. Francisco, M. Hartman, and Y. Wang, “Inclusion and special education,” Educ. Sci., 2020.
M. de S. Chaui, “Ideologia e educação,” Educ. e Pesqui., 2016. [8] National Research Council, “How Students Learn : Mathematics in the Classroom,” Natl. Acad. Press, 2005. [9] R. Carriero and L. Todesco, “Housework division and gender
ideology: When do attitudes really matter?,” Demogr. Res., 2018.
X. Rambla, R. S. Pereira, and L. M. Gallego, “Los mecanismos de la distorsión entre edades y cursos en brasil: Una fractura étnica y social, y un reto para la política educativa,” Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., 2013.
R. A. Moffit and M. Ver Ploeg, Evaluating welfare reform in an era of transition: A report of the National Research Council. 2001.
S. Bowles, H. Gintis, and P. Meyer, “The long shadow of work: Education, the family, and the reproduction of the social division of labor,” Crit. Sociol., 1975.
S. Bowles, H. Gintis, and P. Meyer, “The long shadow of work: Education, the family, and the reproduction of the social division of labor,” Crit. Sociol., 1999.
M. S. Khalid and M. J. L. Pedersen, “Digital Exclusion in Higher Education Contexts: A Systematic Literature Review,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2016.
S. D. Abdul Bujang, A. Selamat, O. Krejcar, P. Maresova, and N. T. Nguyen, “Digital learning demand for future education 4.0-case studies at Malaysia education institutions,” Informatics, 2020.
N. M. Ardoin, A. W. Bowers, and E. Gaillard, “Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review,” Biol. Conserv., 2020.
N. Iivari, S. Sharma, and L. Ventä-Olkkonen, “Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., 2020.
N. T. To Khuyen, N. Van Bien, P. L. Lin, J. Lin, and C. Y. Chang, “Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development,” Sustain., 2020.
G. D. Boca and S. Saraçli, “Environmental education and student’s perception, for sustainability,” Sustain., 2019. [20] H. Khalili, “Online interprofessional education during and post the COVID-19 pandemic: a commentary,” J. Interprof. Care, 2020.
F. Grivokostopoulou, K. Kovas, and I. Perikos, “Examining the impact of a gamified entrepreneurship education framework in higher education,” Sustain., 2019.
D. Black, C. Bissessar, and M. Boolaky, “Online Education as an Opportunity Equalizer: The Changing Canvas of Online Education,” Interchange, 2019.
Ó. Ní Bhroin and F. King, “Teacher education for inclusive education: a framework for developing collaboration for the inclusion of students with support plans,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., 2020.
M. E. Oswald-Egg and U. Renold, “No experience, no employment: The effect of vocational education and training work experience on labour market outcomes after higher education,” Econ. Educ. Rev., 2021.
H. Leung, D. T. L. Shek, E. Leung, and E. Y. W. Shek, “Development of contextually-relevant sexuality education: Lessons from a comprehensive review of adolescent sexuality education across cultures,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019.
S. K. Akran and S. Aşiroğlu, “Perceptions of teachers towards the stem education and the constructivist education approach: Is the constructivist education approach preparatory to the STEM education?,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., 2018.
